I understand that, and outside of length of time I didn't really compare the two situations.
Guitarsoup said:Sea Speed said:
You have gabby who it sounded like was mostly intact in the wide open after about a month. How long has laundries been missing? Since Sept 14th? I wonder how long the area was flooded, and if it was a significant amount of time I feel like that would delay the decomposition process.
Either way, its wild how fast we can become just a pile of bones.
One was in a swamp, one was in an arid mountain
Huh? It being flooded would expedite the decomposition process, not delay it..Sea Speed said:
You have gabby who it sounded like was mostly intact in the wide open after about a month. How long has laundries been missing? Since Sept 14th? I wonder how long the area was flooded, and if it was a significant amount of time I feel like that would delay the decomposition process.
Either way, its wild how fast we can become just a pile of bones.
That's probably a good thing or you might need to change your username to Dexter.Sea Speed said:
Well if nothing else, we now know that I dont know anything about human decomposition.
Her husband is Cricket from IASIPtandy miller said:Sea Speed said:
It seems extremely fast for his remains to now be bones. Smart ass gator comments aside, i really don't see how his body would only be bones this quickly.
Bones
Or you are trying to throw us off because you DO know a lot about human decomposition.Sea Speed said:
Well if nothing else, we now know that I dont know anything about human decomposition.
The Dirty Sock said:
Ok, now let's go after the parents
Yeah! Let's go camp out in their front yard with bullhorns, like perfectly well-adjusted, sane people who are simply interested in justice for the deceased!! Who's with me??? AAARGGHHThe Dirty Sock said:
Ok, now let's go after the parents
God forbid someone on TexAgs make assumptions on the crime they believe someone else committed!Sea Speed said:
You are assuming they did this. I have not seen any evidence showing that they hid anything or had knowledge of what happened and intentionally hid it from police.
Speaking of that...helloimustbegoing said:God forbid someone on TexAgs make assumptions on the crime they believe someone else committed!Sea Speed said:
You are assuming they did this. I have not seen any evidence showing that they hid anything or had knowledge of what happened and intentionally hid it from police.
Sea Speed said:
You are assuming they did this. I have not seen any evidence showing that they hid anything or had knowledge of what happened and intentionally hid it from police.
onceaggie3.0 said:
She dumped him and he couldn't handle knowing it was the best ass he would ever get..a blue pilled simp
Sea Speed said:
Iirc hadn't he already "skipped town" when she was reported missing, or about that time? Either way, I just can't get on board with fan fictioning their punishment when there is no real evidence of their wrongdoing.
Oh, how social media and message boards make the Salem Witch Hunts look ordinary.planoaggie123 said:Sea Speed said:
Iirc hadn't he already "skipped town" when she was reported missing, or about that time? Either way, I just can't get on board with fan fictioning their punishment when there is no real evidence of their wrongdoing.
I get not being guilty until proven otherwise....but they definitely interacted after he had murdered her and unless he is an amazing psychopath....greater than 75% chance he told them and they panicked and helped....
hopefully we find out but, at a minimum, even if they did nothing wrong, they are guilty in the court of public opinion and will likely need to explain more if they want to escape that reality (assuming innocent in first place).