quote:
quote:
quote:
Point is, you never heard Hogan, Nelson, Snead, Arnie, or Jack offering excuses when they played poorly. And they all did. But then, those asking the questions had different expectations as well.
This seems like a really valid comparison... Give me a break.
Straighten me out, good sir.
The main reason I don't think this is a good comparison is that Tiger plays in the Golf Channel era. Snead for example... First ever national broadcast of a golf tournament was in 1953, so at least 68 of his 82 wins happened before golf had ever been on TV at all. When Snead finished T-10 at the Wyndham Championship did he have a dozen reporters asking him questions? Did he have anyone asking him questions at all?
The amount of media that Tiger has to deal with now totally blows away what those guys you mentioned had to deal with. Those guys you mentioned played in a time where no media outlet had the resources or a reason to give a crap about whether they were limping or why they were limping. And if they did care they didn't have the resources to send someone over to interview a guy who didn't win the tournament to ask him about it. Had Jack Nicklaus fallen off a cliff and broken his leg, it would have been a blurb in the morning paper. Same thing happens to Fowler, Spieth, Bubba, Rose, Scott or probably a dozen other big names of the sport and it's front page news on ESPN, Morning Drive talks about it for an hour, every golf site has a blog post about it, and there is a national conversation about the safety of the course. If it's Tiger Woods, multiply that coverage by about ten and it's CNN's top story of the day as well.
Also, his comment about his hip being sore was in direct response to someone asking him "why were you limping?" He said several times in that interview that he had lots of opportunities and just didn't get it done. He never blamed anything about his round on a sore hip at all.