Time to Fire Earley

38,742 Views | 346 Replies | Last: 17 hrs ago by Texas_Ag11
HoustonAg2106
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FM 949 said:

TarponChaser said:

cevans_40 said:

cocacolaaggie68 said:

All waisted words. Nothing will happen or be reviewed till the end of the season. Agree this type conversation hurts recruiting as the season progresses.

You are correct about it hurting recruiting. But it's going to happen, everywhere, not just here, when you put a product on the field like we have done for the past 14 months. And that product does infinitely more harm to recruiting than any words.


In what way is our recruiting hurting? Whether you want Earley gone or not our recruiting has not remotely been hurting. Have you looked at the kids who have committed and/or signed?

You may want to talk to some folks in the high school baseball world. The word is out on this coaching staff.

Sure, but that's not because of conversations on texags.
TarponChaser
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FM 949 said:

TarponChaser said:

cevans_40 said:

cocacolaaggie68 said:

All waisted words. Nothing will happen or be reviewed till the end of the season. Agree this type conversation hurts recruiting as the season progresses.

You are correct about it hurting recruiting. But it's going to happen, everywhere, not just here, when you put a product on the field like we have done for the past 14 months. And that product does infinitely more harm to recruiting than any words.


In what way is our recruiting hurting? Whether you want Earley gone or not our recruiting has not remotely been hurting. Have you looked at the kids who have committed and/or signed?

You may want to talk to some folks in the high school baseball world. The word is out on this coaching staff.

Considering I'm in that world right now with a c/o 2028 son who's starting to get recruited and know people who have kids currently committed and/or signed I think I'm pretty well informed.
cevans_40
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TarponChaser said:

cevans_40 said:

cocacolaaggie68 said:

All waisted words. Nothing will happen or be reviewed till the end of the season. Agree this type conversation hurts recruiting as the season progresses.

You are correct about it hurting recruiting. But it's going to happen, everywhere, not just here, when you put a product on the field like we have done for the past 14 months. And that product does infinitely more harm to recruiting than any words.


In what way is our recruiting hurting? Whether you want Earley gone or not our recruiting has not remotely been hurting. Have you looked at the kids who have committed and/or signed?

Our 2026 class is ranked 9th in the SEC. I guess thats good.
TarponChaser
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cevans_40 said:

TarponChaser said:

cevans_40 said:

cocacolaaggie68 said:

All waisted words. Nothing will happen or be reviewed till the end of the season. Agree this type conversation hurts recruiting as the season progresses.

You are correct about it hurting recruiting. But it's going to happen, everywhere, not just here, when you put a product on the field like we have done for the past 14 months. And that product does infinitely more harm to recruiting than any words.


In what way is our recruiting hurting? Whether you want Earley gone or not our recruiting has not remotely been hurting. Have you looked at the kids who have committed and/or signed?

Our 2026 class is ranked 9th in the SEC. I guess thats good.


And 11th in the country. But unless you're being disingenuous you know that rankings in baseball are notoriously difficult due to guys going in the draft.

Besides, Earley & co. have actually brought in higher-rated players/classes than Dewshnagle did here.
FM 949
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TarponChaser said:

FM 949 said:

TarponChaser said:

cevans_40 said:

cocacolaaggie68 said:

All waisted words. Nothing will happen or be reviewed till the end of the season. Agree this type conversation hurts recruiting as the season progresses.

You are correct about it hurting recruiting. But it's going to happen, everywhere, not just here, when you put a product on the field like we have done for the past 14 months. And that product does infinitely more harm to recruiting than any words.


In what way is our recruiting hurting? Whether you want Earley gone or not our recruiting has not remotely been hurting. Have you looked at the kids who have committed and/or signed?

You may want to talk to some folks in the high school baseball world. The word is out on this coaching staff.

Considering I'm in that world right now with a c/o 2028 son who's starting to get recruited and know people who have kids currently committed and/or signed I think I'm pretty well informed.

based on your responses and questions, maybe not as informed as you should.
TarponChaser
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FM 949 said:

TarponChaser said:

FM 949 said:

TarponChaser said:

cevans_40 said:

cocacolaaggie68 said:

All waisted words. Nothing will happen or be reviewed till the end of the season. Agree this type conversation hurts recruiting as the season progresses.

You are correct about it hurting recruiting. But it's going to happen, everywhere, not just here, when you put a product on the field like we have done for the past 14 months. And that product does infinitely more harm to recruiting than any words.


In what way is our recruiting hurting? Whether you want Earley gone or not our recruiting has not remotely been hurting. Have you looked at the kids who have committed and/or signed?

You may want to talk to some folks in the high school baseball world. The word is out on this coaching staff.

Considering I'm in that world right now with a c/o 2028 son who's starting to get recruited and know people who have kids currently committed and/or signed I think I'm pretty well informed.

based on your responses and questions, maybe not as informed as you should.


Yeah, I'm guessing the HS coaches I know and kids in the '26 & '27 classes signed/committed, along with their coaches who rave about the staff are just lying to my face. Same for the HS directors of the summer showcase programs who have kids committed/signed.
cevans_40
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TarponChaser said:

cevans_40 said:

TarponChaser said:

cevans_40 said:

cocacolaaggie68 said:

All waisted words. Nothing will happen or be reviewed till the end of the season. Agree this type conversation hurts recruiting as the season progresses.

You are correct about it hurting recruiting. But it's going to happen, everywhere, not just here, when you put a product on the field like we have done for the past 14 months. And that product does infinitely more harm to recruiting than any words.


In what way is our recruiting hurting? Whether you want Earley gone or not our recruiting has not remotely been hurting. Have you looked at the kids who have committed and/or signed?

Our 2026 class is ranked 9th in the SEC. I guess thats good.


And 11th in the country. But unless you're being disingenuous you know that rankings in baseball are notoriously difficult due to guys going in the draft.

Besides, Earley & co. have actually brought in higher-rated players/classes than Dewshnagle did here.

Ok. Its all roses and sunshine. No worries about the product on the field.
TarponChaser
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cevans_40 said:

TarponChaser said:

cevans_40 said:

TarponChaser said:

cevans_40 said:

cocacolaaggie68 said:

All waisted words. Nothing will happen or be reviewed till the end of the season. Agree this type conversation hurts recruiting as the season progresses.

You are correct about it hurting recruiting. But it's going to happen, everywhere, not just here, when you put a product on the field like we have done for the past 14 months. And that product does infinitely more harm to recruiting than any words.


In what way is our recruiting hurting? Whether you want Earley gone or not our recruiting has not remotely been hurting. Have you looked at the kids who have committed and/or signed?

Our 2026 class is ranked 9th in the SEC. I guess thats good.


And 11th in the country. But unless you're being disingenuous you know that rankings in baseball are notoriously difficult due to guys going in the draft.

Besides, Earley & co. have actually brought in higher-rated players/classes than Dewshnagle did here.

Ok. Its all roses and sunshine. No worries about the product on the field.


Where have I ever said that?
Texas_Ag11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gyles Marrett said:

There's where your actual point of view is exposed. You are basing it off the preseason rankings.



We had 8 players drafted AFTER the season and none of them the injured guys. But, nothing will change your mind at this point.
It's pronounced thermometer
HoustonAg2106
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Texas_Ag11 said:

Gyles Marrett said:

There's where your actual point of view is exposed. You are basing it off the preseason rankings.



We had 8 players drafted AFTER the season and none of them the injured guys. But, nothing will change your mind at this point.

LOL
Gyles Marrett
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FM 949 said:

TarponChaser said:

cevans_40 said:

cocacolaaggie68 said:

All waisted words. Nothing will happen or be reviewed till the end of the season. Agree this type conversation hurts recruiting as the season progresses.

You are correct about it hurting recruiting. But it's going to happen, everywhere, not just here, when you put a product on the field like we have done for the past 14 months. And that product does infinitely more harm to recruiting than any words.


In what way is our recruiting hurting? Whether you want Earley gone or not our recruiting has not remotely been hurting. Have you looked at the kids who have committed and/or signed?

You may want to talk to some folks in the high school baseball world. The word is out on this coaching staff.

Are you in the high school baseball world? I sure am, and sure haven't heard anything like that. You think we are getting the commitments we are getting while they all think our staff sucks and is gone? Quite the hypothesis there...
austinag1997
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I am of the overwhelming opinion is you assess every coach at the end of the season.
AgRyan04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What if you made your assessment after last season?
twk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgRyan04 said:

What if you made your assessment after last season?
Then you don't have anything to contribute to the discussion because you've already made up your mind.
Lady Aravis
How long do you want to ignore this user?
twk said:

AgRyan04 said:

What if you made your assessment after last season?
Then you don't have anything to contribute to the discussion because you've already made up your mind.


And because this is an entirely new team, including new coaches and analytics staff.
AgRyan04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
twk said:

AgRyan04 said:

What if you made your assessment after last season?
Then you don't have anything to contribute to the discussion because you've already made up your mind.


I'm open to having my mind changed - I hope we end up doing so well we build a statue of Earley outside the stadium gates.....but I need to see it to believe it.
FM 949
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gyles Marrett said:

FM 949 said:

TarponChaser said:

cevans_40 said:

cocacolaaggie68 said:

All waisted words. Nothing will happen or be reviewed till the end of the season. Agree this type conversation hurts recruiting as the season progresses.

You are correct about it hurting recruiting. But it's going to happen, everywhere, not just here, when you put a product on the field like we have done for the past 14 months. And that product does infinitely more harm to recruiting than any words.


In what way is our recruiting hurting? Whether you want Earley gone or not our recruiting has not remotely been hurting. Have you looked at the kids who have committed and/or signed?

You may want to talk to some folks in the high school baseball world. The word is out on this coaching staff.

Are you in the high school baseball world? I sure am, and sure haven't heard anything like that. You think we are getting the commitments we are getting while they all think our staff sucks and is gone? Quite the hypothesis there...


I'm sure we'll see. Much like the rest of high school baseball and even worse select ball, every parent is an expert. That goes for myself, too.
Fairview20
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The injury excuse doesn't hold up when the result of the season was missing the tournament completely and being 8 games below .500 in SEC play.

The injuries would've been a great excuse as to why the preseason #1 team failed to host a regional. Missing the tournament completely was a colossal failure, and I'm sure the coaching staff would agree.

Trev was also kicking the tires around moving on from Earley last year. Reading the tea leaves from Kendall and others we reached out to Vitello and O'Connor again. There was that awkward week between the season ending and Trev announcing Earley was back. That wasn't just a coincidence, with the heat that was on Earley at the time, you make that announcement the day after the season is over if that was your intention from the jump.

This year's team looks much improved, but that bar was set very low. The last two weekends have been disappointing and feel like more of the same. These next two weekends are massive because they will be the two easiest series we have left. Can't afford to not win them both.
hillcountryag86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
austinag1997 said:

I am of the overwhelming opinion is you assess every coach at the end of the season.

South Carolina ....
Fairview20
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
hillcountryag86 said:

austinag1997 said:

I am of the overwhelming opinion is you assess every coach at the end of the season.

South Carolina ....


Mississippi State last year as well. Firing Lemonis a month early may not have helped them land O'Connor, but it definitely didn't hurt.

This isn't in relation to our situation as of today. I just think a set rule of not firing coaches until the season is completely over is outdated. When you know you know.
LB12Diamond
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pretty sure they had the new guy locked up prior to doing the firing.
Gig ‘Em Baby!
Fairview20
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He very well might have, and that goes even further in the direction of not giving the sitting coach the full season before making a decision. It's unfortunate for the party getting fired but that is the most efficient way to do it IMO. Eliminates the possibility of fan speculation running wild with pie in the sky candidates too.
LB12Diamond
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Every coach we fire is well compensated. No reason to lose any sleep on that one.
Gig ‘Em Baby!
Fairview20
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Agreed
hillcountryag86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Fairview20 said:

hillcountryag86 said:

austinag1997 said:

I am of the overwhelming opinion is you assess every coach at the end of the season.

South Carolina ....


Mississippi State last year as well. Firing Lemonis a month early may not have helped them land O'Connor, but it definitely didn't hurt.

This isn't in relation to our situation as of today. I just think a set rule of not firing coaches until the season is completely over is outdated. When you know you know.

This is logic. Austin Ag, I think it is generally best to let the season play out. So much chaos generated mid season. But sometimes a mid season change is warranted. Just don't think you can stick to a rule.

TarponChaser
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hillcountryag86 said:

Fairview20 said:

hillcountryag86 said:

austinag1997 said:

I am of the overwhelming opinion is you assess every coach at the end of the season.

South Carolina ....


Mississippi State last year as well. Firing Lemonis a month early may not have helped them land O'Connor, but it definitely didn't hurt.

This isn't in relation to our situation as of today. I just think a set rule of not firing coaches until the season is completely over is outdated. When you know you know.

This is logic. Austin Ag, I think it is generally best to let the season play out. So much chaos generated mid season. But sometimes a mid season change is warranted. Just don't think you can stick to a rule.




Midseason firings can certainly be justified but a top-20 ranking and our only losses being to top-10 teams isn't really justified. Even with last season.
aggiewilliford
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He screws up this Mizzu series I think it should be a serious discussion.
Gig Em Ags, God Bless Old Army and Marching in Behind the Band! Whooooopppp
AgSnacks16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I am ready for him to be gone
blake2003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm also ready.
Decay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Winning 10-1 really made you feel like we shook off some demons.

So this is pretty much the opposite of that
MROD92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fire Earley!!! Hire GW!!
aggiewilliford
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MROD92 said:

Fire Earley!!! Hire GW!!


WE CANT AFFORD HIM..
aggiewilliford
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MROD92 said:

Fire Earley!!! Hire GW!!

Have you seen this man...
MROD92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
All my heart
Leander - Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Decay said:

Winning 10-1 really made you feel like we shook off some demons.

So this is pretty much the opposite of that


Clear signal he can't manage a game
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.