Thats what I was thinking. Its a one run game in 7th.LB12Diamond said:AgEng06 said:
He actually may have been safe at 2nd.
Yes
No reason to not review that one with both your challenges this late in the game.
Thats what I was thinking. Its a one run game in 7th.LB12Diamond said:AgEng06 said:
He actually may have been safe at 2nd.
Yes
No reason to not review that one with both your challenges this late in the game.
I disagree. They have both challenges left. It's not like they get a bonus by not using their challenges. Who cares if you lose the challenge. It was a very close play.AggieBiker said:
I did not see it as enough evidence to confirm or overturn so probably a good no-challenge. I think they would have said the call stands.
So down by a run with only a couple innings left and you think there will be 2 more very close plays to challenge???AggieBiker said:
I feel like unless you can guarantee there will not be a need to use both of the challenges with at least two innings and maybe multiple more innings left, it is an even risk and neither dumb or smart. If your player insists he was safe then you probably use the challenge but I don't believe the runner exhibited a high level of conviction he was safe so why use it. And I still believe the replay would not have supported an overturn so how is it dumb not to use a challenge on a play that would not have been overturned? I don't get your logic unless you are confident the play would have been overturned.
That was the 8th inning.Captn_Ag05 said:
NC state down to their final strike
Only the 8th/ One more ABCaptn_Ag05 said:
NC state down to their final strike
Captn_Ag05 said:
jkk
Final strike...of the 8th. Obviously what I meant.AgEng06 said:That was the 8th inning.Captn_Ag05 said:
NC state down to their final strike
In corporate world for 35 years. "Important?" Made me laugh.Captn_Ag05 said:
What I get for trying to watch a game during an "important meeting"
StinkyPinky said:
He would have got there without the hesitation