Thats what I was thinking. Its a one run game in 7th.LB12Diamond said:AgEng06 said:
He actually may have been safe at 2nd.
Yes
No reason to not review that one with both your challenges this late in the game.
2024 Omaha Scoreboard (6/14 - 6/24)
121,765 Views |
1835 Replies |
Last: 4 mo ago by CapCityAg89
Wolfpack needs to take the lead in the 7th
I did not see it as enough evidence to confirm or overturn so probably a good no-challenge. I think they would have said the call stands.
I know he's a good pitcher, but Neely's windup annoys me so much.
that was not good by the pack nine
Really good pitch there. Nothing that hitter could do.
I disagree. They have both challenges left. It's not like they get a bonus by not using their challenges. Who cares if you lose the challenge. It was a very close play.AggieBiker said:
I did not see it as enough evidence to confirm or overturn so probably a good no-challenge. I think they would have said the call stands.
Dumb not to use a challenge there.
It's time NC. Send FL home.
I feel like unless you can guarantee there will not be a need to use both of the challenges with at least two innings and maybe multiple more innings left, it is an even risk and neither dumb or smart. If your player insists he was safe then you probably use the challenge but I don't believe the runner exhibited a high level of conviction he was safe so why use it. And I still believe the replay would not have supported an overturn so how is it dumb not to use a challenge on a play that would not have been overturned? I don't get your logic unless you are confident the play would have been overturned.
One swing.
Leadoff single. Let's goooo.
Matsui
Joined:
Dec 2, 2001
Posts:
29,632
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This has been an incredible CWS so far. So many good games.
It's going to be tough to get a run against Neely if he can stay on with his pitching. He is good like Asch and maybe better raw talent.
So down by a run with only a couple innings left and you think there will be 2 more very close plays to challenge???AggieBiker said:
I feel like unless you can guarantee there will not be a need to use both of the challenges with at least two innings and maybe multiple more innings left, it is an even risk and neither dumb or smart. If your player insists he was safe then you probably use the challenge but I don't believe the runner exhibited a high level of conviction he was safe so why use it. And I still believe the replay would not have supported an overturn so how is it dumb not to use a challenge on a play that would not have been overturned? I don't get your logic unless you are confident the play would have been overturned.
Just........One.......Swing.
So slow
That's why we run on strike 3, men.
94chem,
That, sir, was the greatest post in the history of TexAgs. I salute you. -- Dough
That, sir, was the greatest post in the history of TexAgs. I salute you. -- Dough
He would have got there without the hesitation
Ugh
Really needed to tie it up there.
Break out of the box faster! Damn lollygagging member of the pack!
That was the 8th inning.Captn_Ag05 said:
NC state down to their final strike
Only the 8th/ One more ABCaptn_Ag05 said:
NC state down to their final strike
Captn_Ag05 said:
jkk
First base played the outside of the bag and runner had to swerve inside because otherwise he's obstructing the throw? Do I have that right?
Awkward play all around.
Awkward play all around.
What I get for trying to watch a game during an "important meeting"
But yeah, they have had chances in the 7th and 8th to get a run and haven't. They're most likely going to regret that later.
Final strike...of the 8th. Obviously what I meant.AgEng06 said:That was the 8th inning.Captn_Ag05 said:
NC state down to their final strike
In corporate world for 35 years. "Important?" Made me laugh.Captn_Ag05 said:
What I get for trying to watch a game during an "important meeting"
Even though it would make our start time later, it would be great if this one goes 20 innings.
I have a greater conviction that the play would not have been overturned. It's a one run game and could easily go to extra innings so I won't assume there are only two to play. I will grant you that you are more likely to get an ump review in late in a tight game if you are out of challenges so you could more correct than me based on that but I just did not see enough objection from the player to use a challenge and I think it would have been wasted so that is no better than leaving in your pocket in a game you ultimately lose by one run. Just my opinion based on how I look at risks and the probability of success with the challenge. The main thing I disagree with you on is that it is inherently dumb. I think it doesn't have to be dumb or smart either way.
Whitaker has been huge, and really helps NC St if they can win this game.
Why oh why pitch to Cags......that one very dumb mistake may cost NC State their season.
StinkyPinky said:
He would have got there without the hesitation
I did not see his hesitation at first. And thought oh he's going to be safe. Next, how slow is that guy?
Featured Stories
See All
FINAL from Reed Arena: No. 23 Texas A&M 78, No. 21 Ohio State 64
by Luke Evangelist
19:50
10h ago
3.9k
Donors can now earn priority points by giving to Texas Aggies United
by Texas Aggies United
A&M's approach remains the same with NMSU coming to Aggieland
by Olin Buchanan
61:40
11h ago
2.1k
6:01
9h ago
988