Maybe Jason Kidd can fill in for Kyrie. Need a guy to handle the ball and he wouldn't raise the average age of the roster much at all
Going from 10-year championship window to fire sale in the span of a month is truly nasty workFriscoKid said:Quote:
That doesn't change the fact that it's still a good roster.
It sucks and it's a complete rebuild thanks to the GM. Sell off everything for draft picks at this point.
I wasnt meaning to call you out, but more just quotes and articles that have come out after the fact (including from Brunson himself)Zachary Klement said:I was off on the Brunson thing.PatAg said:Yea, Im not buying the revisionist history. Brunson clearly was gone, I dont care what he says after the fact.shack009 said:Zachary Klement said:If I recall correctly, they had a chance to sign Brunson midway through the 21-22 season as well and by that point, there was more data that pointed toward him being better than the guy we saw in the Clippers series, no?shack009 said:
The Brunson narrative has gotten out of control in the past month also.
He was borderline unplayable in the Clippers series in 21 and he was all but headed to his dad in NY by the middle of that offseason. It would have taken $20 million+ to get him to sign the extension and the Mavs would have been crazy to agree to that after how he played in the playoffs.
People have let their emotions completely get ahold of them.
No, he was all but gone before the season.
Never mind that it's hard to have a fire sale when all the goods are broken and held together with duct tape.Goldie Wilson said:Going from 10-year championship window to fire sale in the span of a month is truly nasty workFriscoKid said:Quote:
That doesn't change the fact that it's still a good roster.
It sucks and it's a complete rebuild thanks to the GM. Sell off everything for draft picks at this point.
All offense intended with the following.500,000ags said:
Fandom since 2000 (since I was 11) and these cretin outsiders just ripped this org to shreds.
Same, and every person I actually know feels the same as we do. They arent ready to just forever give up on the Mavs, but they are definitely done with actively following this season, and are very upset with the front office.zgolfz85 said:
I've still yet to see a single person I know whether on here or real life renewing season tix
agreed on all. I'll always root for Luka...sucks that it's LAL of all teams that he went to.PatAg said:Same, and every person I actually know feels the same as we do. They arent ready to just forever give up on the Mavs, but they are definitely done with actively following this season, and are very upset with the front office.zgolfz85 said:
I've still yet to see a single person I know whether on here or real life renewing season tix
I'm sure we all will keep tabs on the team, and if they manage to make the playoffs we will see if we all actually don't watch or not.
(I probably will, just due to the fact that I always watch the nba playoffs..and I DO like the guys on the team that are still there)
I'm watching highlights of Luka, and occassionally catching stretches of their games live, but definitely not becoming a Lakers fan. I think that would be weird for any adult to do....now for kids that are like 8 to 22-23 who Luka has been their guy, maybe couldnt blame them for swapping.
Yeah, I feel you. I did not pay as much attention to it after he left...he was gone and it seemed like we were still in fine shape. I was also super high on Hardy after the draft lolPatAg said:I wasnt meaning to call you out, but more just quotes and articles that have come out after the fact (including from Brunson himself)Zachary Klement said:I was off on the Brunson thing.PatAg said:Yea, Im not buying the revisionist history. Brunson clearly was gone, I dont care what he says after the fact.shack009 said:Zachary Klement said:If I recall correctly, they had a chance to sign Brunson midway through the 21-22 season as well and by that point, there was more data that pointed toward him being better than the guy we saw in the Clippers series, no?shack009 said:
The Brunson narrative has gotten out of control in the past month also.
He was borderline unplayable in the Clippers series in 21 and he was all but headed to his dad in NY by the middle of that offseason. It would have taken $20 million+ to get him to sign the extension and the Mavs would have been crazy to agree to that after how he played in the playoffs.
People have let their emotions completely get ahold of them.
No, he was all but gone before the season.
Yea, but you never change up and start rooting for your rival...500,000ags said:
The Mavs went from always being known for loyalty and the 2011 run, to now being known as the team that traded Luka. Luka was going to be an extension of what made the Mavs great, and now it's this bull***** For Christs sake, this team is owned and run by Sheldon Adelson's (who I already didn't care for) offshoots.
Plus, the Mavs & Spurs hate has morphed into mutual respect over the years. Tony Parker credited Dirk for being the best NBA Euro ever. These two teams gave me some of the best rivalry sports competition of my lifetime.
PatAg said:Same, and every person I actually know feels the same as we do. They arent ready to just forever give up on the Mavs, but they are definitely done with actively following this season, and are very upset with the front office.zgolfz85 said:
I've still yet to see a single person I know whether on here or real life renewing season tix
I'm sure we all will keep tabs on the team, and if they manage to make the playoffs we will see if we all actually don't watch or not.
(I probably will, just due to the fact that I always watch the nba playoffs..and I DO like the guys on the team that are still there)
Agree with this as well.
I also know noone that is renewing tickets. And I literally mean no one.
I'm watching highlights of Luka, and occassionally catching stretches of their games live, but definitely not becoming a Lakers fan. I think that would be weird for any adult to do....now for kids that are like 8 to 22-23 who Luka has been their guy, maybe couldnt blame them for swapping.
exactly. it's a classic tale. If he really loves the fans, the city and the baby he raised, he'd be looking for other suitors behind the scenes (VC, billionaires, etc.) that actually give a **** about having a competitive and city-embraced team again. He'd be the biggest hero of all time after falling into villain status by selling to a bottom line only pos ownership group.MW03 said:
Mom & Pop builds a company. They are loyal to their employees and customers, treat them like family. The company grows and becomes valuable, more complicated. Mom & Pop no longer have the time to manage everything. Life is changing; their interests are changing. The company is still growing. They need a new warehouse. The need new equipment. Do they really want to oversee the next 25 years like they did the last 25 years?
So they answer the call from a VC. They've been watching Mom & Pop, and they want to sit down and talk about what the future of the company looks like. "We share your vision!" the VC says. The pitch deck is convincing. They seem to understand what Mom & Pop built. And the numbers don't hurt, either.
They worry because the VC wants a controlling share of the company, but Mom & Pop have made every decision together, by themselves, the last 25 years. "Don't worry," the VC says. "We understand what you did to build this and how you made it so valuable. You will be in every decision. Your counsel is critical."
Mom & Pop are relieved. And the numbers still don't hurt. So they smile and sign on the dotted line, happy to set down the reigns. Convinced their 27% and decades of experience will help make sure the future of the company is secured.
A year later, the VC has sold off the most valuable assets. They've mistreated their employees, raised their prices, and alienated their customers. It's only been a year, but it feels like 25 to Mom & Pop.
And what can they do? Sit and smile, knowing they made a mistake. After all, they don't call them "sharks" for nothing.
Except Cuban isn't Mom & Pop and knows better than anyone that his 27% is worthless and that he would have no control whatsoever post-Closing. So he does not get a pass like Mom & Pop would. Mom & Pop didn't know how the process works with VC/Private Equity and truly believed everything would be the same after closing (because they took VC/Private Equity at their word). Cuban knows this isn't the case, and thus deserves a ton of blame for who he sold to.MW03 said:
Mom & Pop builds a company. They are loyal to their employees and customers, treat them like family. The company grows and becomes valuable, more complicated. Mom & Pop no longer have the time to manage everything. Life is changing; their interests are changing. The company is still growing. They need a new warehouse. The need new equipment. Do they really want to oversee the next 25 years like they did the last 25 years?
So they answer the call from a VC. They've been watching Mom & Pop, and they want to sit down and talk about what the future of the company looks like. "We share your vision!" the VC says. The pitch deck is convincing. They seem to understand what Mom & Pop built. And the numbers don't hurt, either.
They worry because the VC wants a controlling share of the company, but Mom & Pop have made every decision together, by themselves, the last 25 years. "Don't worry," the VC says. "We understand what you did to build this and how you made it so valuable. You will be in every decision. Your counsel is critical."
Mom & Pop are relieved. And the numbers still don't hurt. So they smile and sign on the dotted line, happy to set down the reigns. Convinced their 27% and decades of experience will help make sure the future of the company is secured.
A year later, the VC has sold off the most valuable assets. They've mistreated their employees, raised their prices, and alienated their customers. It's only been a year, but it feels like 25 to Mom & Pop.
And what can they do? Sit and smile, knowing they made a mistake. After all, they don't call them "sharks" for nothing.
mavsfan4ever said:Except Cuban isn't Mom & Pop and knows better than anyone that his 27% is worthless and that he would have no control whatsoever post-Closing. So he does not get a pass like Mom & Pop would. Mom & Pop didn't know how the process works with VC/Private Equity and truly believed everything would be the same after closing (because they took VC/Private Equity at their word). Cuban knows this isn't the case, and thus deserves a ton of blame for who he sold to.MW03 said:
Mom & Pop builds a company. They are loyal to their employees and customers, treat them like family. The company grows and becomes valuable, more complicated. Mom & Pop no longer have the time to manage everything. Life is changing; their interests are changing. The company is still growing. They need a new warehouse. The need new equipment. Do they really want to oversee the next 25 years like they did the last 25 years?
So they answer the call from a VC. They've been watching Mom & Pop, and they want to sit down and talk about what the future of the company looks like. "We share your vision!" the VC says. The pitch deck is convincing. They seem to understand what Mom & Pop built. And the numbers don't hurt, either.
They worry because the VC wants a controlling share of the company, but Mom & Pop have made every decision together, by themselves, the last 25 years. "Don't worry," the VC says. "We understand what you did to build this and how you made it so valuable. You will be in every decision. Your counsel is critical."
Mom & Pop are relieved. And the numbers still don't hurt. So they smile and sign on the dotted line, happy to set down the reigns. Convinced their 27% and decades of experience will help make sure the future of the company is secured.
A year later, the VC has sold off the most valuable assets. They've mistreated their employees, raised their prices, and alienated their customers. It's only been a year, but it feels like 25 to Mom & Pop.
And what can they do? Sit and smile, knowing they made a mistake. After all, they don't call them "sharks" for nothing.
If Cuban really cared about the franchise, he would have sold to someone vested in Dallas, etc. And certainly not Dumbass Dumont.
I don't blame Cuban as much as Nico or Dumont. But I definitely blame him. And to make matter worse, he didn't even get a good price from the Adelsons. So it seems like he was dead set on selling to them. He definitely would have received a higher price if he put the Mavs on the market.
**** Cuban.
DannyDuberstein said:
Yep. The basketball ops involvement after the sale was interesting. Sure seemed like he got pushed aside faster than we were led to believe would happen. But you sold 73%, so with minority interest comes a minority share of power. But he unquestionably F'd the franchise with 2 decisions
I'm guessing Nico undermined him with Dumont to make that happen. Nico saw an angle to full autonomy with Mark pushed out
500,000ags said:
I can literally find fault in Nico, Dumont, Cuban, Luka, Kidd, et al.
Us fans just have to watch these buffoons win sometimes, lose sometimes, and always cash big checks.
EastSideAg2002 said:
State of Mavs Fans
"It's in the realm of the worst month for an organization in the history of the sport." - @WindhorstESPN @espn_macmahon | @TimBontemps https://t.co/OtFpuqf0lG pic.twitter.com/8QaaOVwyrU
— ESPN Podcasts (@espnpodcasts) March 5, 2025