***Official 2024 - 2025 Dallas Mavericks Season Thread***

133,127 Views | 2014 Replies | Last: 20 min ago by Guitarsoup
marryanny
How long do you want to ignore this user?
zgolfz85 said:

shack009 said:

zgolfz85 said:

Guitarsoup said:

shack009 said:

Guitarsoup said:


But for it to really make sense long term, Luka needs to drink himself into Embiid-type of missed games. Embiid's contract is catastrophically the worst in the NBA by a long shot and no one else is even close. Making that bet that Luka turns into is wild from the outside looking in and without the insider knowledge that Kidd, etc would have.
Yep, this is the only thing that will give Mavs fans peace, long term. Have to be able to look back and say "Nico was right about Luka's lifestyle and commitment to basketball." We won't have the answer for another 10 years probably.

The weird thing is, we will have no way of knowing if Luka ever would have gotten his ass in gear while he was here. If he does it in LA, it will probably be because of his "F you" mentality that the trade created.
I think you can give the F You effort short term, but I am doubtful that a player can change their entire life around it for a decade. Luka may drop 100 on Feb 25th, but I don't think he will develop Mamba Mentality for the rest of his career to prove Nico wrong.


I don't think he needs to. The dude might not have the conditioning ethic we wanted, but the holding himself to legendary standards for wins and losses and the generational talent ego and hatred for losses is clearly there, fat boy or not. The dude is 25. I was a 3 night a week bar binge drinker at 25. My bet would be on playing good cop bad cop with him internally to make him revenge body for the Mavs and betting on his maturation. Losing makes people like Luka angry. There was too much meat on the bone and upside there to throw it away…and that's just the on court stuff. There's not a single justification for off court business stuff, unless you like devaluing a brand, especially in a football first town.
It isn't there enough to make him not gain weight from the final regular season game to the playoffs. It isn't there enough to get his body right in the offseason to the point where you don't get injured in a pickup game before training camp.

Like GS said above, he doesn't have that long term singular focus/discipline. He only has it when he's on the court.

It's possible he wins a championship and maybe multiple championships. I just disagree with most people's thoughts on the likelihood of it happening.
Many said the same about Jordan in the 80s....and some cocky kid from Philly in his early days in LA....and some nerdy/awkward looking white boy from Indiana.....and Giannis was never going to develop his body enough to be dominant....and Tatum didn't have the cutthroat mentality needed to lead a championship team....and same for Dirk and on and on we go. You just don't piss away generational talent DNA...they'll prove you wrong more often than not.
You wouldn't get rid of someone like Luka because they like food, would you? He's a guy who lives for the moment. When the lights are on, he's locked in. He might not be obsessed with his body like Kobe or LeBron, but he hates losing. That makes him dangerous.
People love rewriting history, and they said the same about loads of other all-time greats who weren't "serious enough" until they were.Shaq was out of shape every other summer, Jokic was "too lazy" and "didn't care enough," and Dirk "wasn't cutthroat."Guess what? Rings talk.Luka is still learning how to handle the long-term grind, but he's already an all-time playoff performer.
And as for the Mavs, you don't let go of one of the most marketable, box-office superstars in the league just because he spends the offseason eating steak and playing pick-up in Slovenia.You work with him, you play the long game, and you make sure he has the structure to reach his peak.If he gets that "revenge body" and locks in, we're looking at a guy who could be the face of the league. You can't just throw that away.
DannyDuberstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The thing with Luka is that while his conditioning needs work, he has the type of game that should age really well. His isn't a game of explosion. It's a game of body control, ball control, and creativity. He has such an ability to control where he wants a defender with that wide body and then react from there with the ball
M.C. Swag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
shack009 said:

Zachary Klement said:

dave94 said:

Zachary Klement said:


Phew! Good thing the Mavs dumped him for a 30 year old. AlIgNs WiTh OuR (injury) tImElInE.


Nico out here losing every trade
Shack or his buddy is gonna chime in and tell us why we're wrong and Caleb Martin is the secret missing key the way AD is now injury free and wayyyyy better for the Mavs than Luka.
It's called roster building. Martin is making very reasonable money for the next 4 years. Grimes was going to walk for nothing in the offseason.

Also Christie is just better than Grimes. Grimes would not have been in the Mavs closing lineup tonight.
But Grimes is better and younger than Caleb Martin. Like...paying more money for a better, younger player is reasonable. If the objective is to "win in the short term", why are the Mavs building a roster with worse talent? Why would they let Grimes walk for nothing? These are fears of an incompetent FO, not traits of savvy roster building.

Nico traded Luka for AD (an older, injured, less talented player)
Nico traded Grimes AND A VALUABLE 2ND RD PICK for Caleb Martin (an older, injured, less talented player)

The roster is older and less talented today than it was 2 weeks ago and we're going to try to justify those moves as something other than incompetent management with a cheap owner?
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
M.C. Swag said:

shack009 said:

Zachary Klement said:

dave94 said:

Zachary Klement said:


Phew! Good thing the Mavs dumped him for a 30 year old. AlIgNs WiTh OuR (injury) tImElInE.


Nico out here losing every trade
Shack or his buddy is gonna chime in and tell us why we're wrong and Caleb Martin is the secret missing key the way AD is now injury free and wayyyyy better for the Mavs than Luka.
It's called roster building. Martin is making very reasonable money for the next 4 years. Grimes was going to walk for nothing in the offseason.

Also Christie is just better than Grimes. Grimes would not have been in the Mavs closing lineup tonight.
But Grimes is better and younger than Caleb Martin. Like...paying more money for a better, younger player is reasonable. If the objective is to "win in the short term", why are the Mavs building a roster with worse talent? Why would they let Grimes walk for nothing? These are fears of an incompetent FO, not traits of savvy roster building.

Nico traded Luka for AD (an older, injured, less talented player)
Nico traded Grimes AND A VALUABLE 2ND RD PICK for Caleb Martin (an older, injured, less talented player)

The roster is older and less talented today than it was 2 weeks ago and we're going to try to justify those moves as something other than incompetent management with a cheap owner?
Grimes demanded out when the Mavs traded for Christie. Either keep Grimes the rest of the year then lose him in free agency or get a similar player on decent value contract (6.5% declining to 5%)
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DannyDuberstein said:

The thing with Luka is that while his conditioning needs work, he has the type of game that should age really well. His isn't a game of explosion. It's a game of body control, ball control, and creativity. He has such an ability to control where he wants a defender with that wide body and then react from there with the ball
But not if he doesn't shoot like he did last year. Everyone has been complaining about how he creates less rim pressure because he doesn't drive as much anymore because of his conditioning.

MC Swag complained about the lack of rim pressure Luka was creating last year and I posted the numbers a few days ago that it dropped even further now.

He is incredible at using his body and size to his advantage, but if he isn't creating rim pressure, he is way less valuable, especially if his shot isn't falling. He's at 46/35 this year and less than 1 of 10 shots he takes is at the rim now, when it had been more than 1 of 4 earlier in his career.

If he is not creating rim pressure and also shooting 35% or worse from three, then his game is going to age poorly overall. Especially with how bad his defense and his defensive effort is.
PatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So we're back to slandering Luka again? sick
DannyDuberstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gosh, yes. Instead of a 34/9/9 guy shooting 48%, he might be a 29/8/8 guy shooting 46%. So poor
M.C. Swag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guitarsoup said:

M.C. Swag said:

shack009 said:

Zachary Klement said:

dave94 said:

Zachary Klement said:


Phew! Good thing the Mavs dumped him for a 30 year old. AlIgNs WiTh OuR (injury) tImElInE.


Nico out here losing every trade
Shack or his buddy is gonna chime in and tell us why we're wrong and Caleb Martin is the secret missing key the way AD is now injury free and wayyyyy better for the Mavs than Luka.
It's called roster building. Martin is making very reasonable money for the next 4 years. Grimes was going to walk for nothing in the offseason.

Also Christie is just better than Grimes. Grimes would not have been in the Mavs closing lineup tonight.
But Grimes is better and younger than Caleb Martin. Like...paying more money for a better, younger player is reasonable. If the objective is to "win in the short term", why are the Mavs building a roster with worse talent? Why would they let Grimes walk for nothing? These are fears of an incompetent FO, not traits of savvy roster building.

Nico traded Luka for AD (an older, injured, less talented player)
Nico traded Grimes AND A VALUABLE 2ND RD PICK for Caleb Martin (an older, injured, less talented player)

The roster is older and less talented today than it was 2 weeks ago and we're going to try to justify those moves as something other than incompetent management with a cheap owner?
Grimes demanded out when the Mavs traded for Christie. Either keep Grimes the rest of the year then lose him in free agency or get a similar player on decent value contract (6.5% declining to 5%)
He's a RFA. The Mavs didn't have to lose him at all.
Zachary Klement
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
M.C. Swag said:

Guitarsoup said:

M.C. Swag said:

shack009 said:

Zachary Klement said:

dave94 said:

Zachary Klement said:


Phew! Good thing the Mavs dumped him for a 30 year old. AlIgNs WiTh OuR (injury) tImElInE.


Nico out here losing every trade
Shack or his buddy is gonna chime in and tell us why we're wrong and Caleb Martin is the secret missing key the way AD is now injury free and wayyyyy better for the Mavs than Luka.
It's called roster building. Martin is making very reasonable money for the next 4 years. Grimes was going to walk for nothing in the offseason.

Also Christie is just better than Grimes. Grimes would not have been in the Mavs closing lineup tonight.
But Grimes is better and younger than Caleb Martin. Like...paying more money for a better, younger player is reasonable. If the objective is to "win in the short term", why are the Mavs building a roster with worse talent? Why would they let Grimes walk for nothing? These are fears of an incompetent FO, not traits of savvy roster building.

Nico traded Luka for AD (an older, injured, less talented player)
Nico traded Grimes AND A VALUABLE 2ND RD PICK for Caleb Martin (an older, injured, less talented player)

The roster is older and less talented today than it was 2 weeks ago and we're going to try to justify those moves as something other than incompetent management with a cheap owner?
Grimes demanded out when the Mavs traded for Christie. Either keep Grimes the rest of the year then lose him in free agency or get a similar player on decent value contract (6.5% declining to 5%)
He's a RFA. The Mavs didn't have to lose him at all.
Dude, it's called roster building. Look it up!
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
M.C. Swag said:

Guitarsoup said:

M.C. Swag said:

shack009 said:

Zachary Klement said:

dave94 said:

Zachary Klement said:


Phew! Good thing the Mavs dumped him for a 30 year old. AlIgNs WiTh OuR (injury) tImElInE.


Nico out here losing every trade
Shack or his buddy is gonna chime in and tell us why we're wrong and Caleb Martin is the secret missing key the way AD is now injury free and wayyyyy better for the Mavs than Luka.
It's called roster building. Martin is making very reasonable money for the next 4 years. Grimes was going to walk for nothing in the offseason.

Also Christie is just better than Grimes. Grimes would not have been in the Mavs closing lineup tonight.
But Grimes is better and younger than Caleb Martin. Like...paying more money for a better, younger player is reasonable. If the objective is to "win in the short term", why are the Mavs building a roster with worse talent? Why would they let Grimes walk for nothing? These are fears of an incompetent FO, not traits of savvy roster building.

Nico traded Luka for AD (an older, injured, less talented player)
Nico traded Grimes AND A VALUABLE 2ND RD PICK for Caleb Martin (an older, injured, less talented player)

The roster is older and less talented today than it was 2 weeks ago and we're going to try to justify those moves as something other than incompetent management with a cheap owner?
Grimes demanded out when the Mavs traded for Christie. Either keep Grimes the rest of the year then lose him in free agency or get a similar player on decent value contract (6.5% declining to 5%)
He's a RFA. The Mavs didn't have to lose him at all.
Ahh yes, forcing players to stay that are demanding a trade then using RFA to keep them against their wishes always goes great.
MW03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Since we're on the topic, I have always thought the "Luka is a terrible defender" was overblown. I think Luka's defensive woes are tied to:

(1) Offensive load
(2) Complaining leading to fast breaks and too many 4 on 5s

From a defensive talent perspective, he seems pretty average. I'd guess his DR over the past 5 years is probably on par with the league average. Same with his defending shooting percentage. He struggles on the perimeter with quick defenders, so he's someone to target in isolation. Above average in the block with his size and hands for his position. Below average over all because of points 1 and 2 above.
M.C. Swag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guitarsoup said:

M.C. Swag said:

Guitarsoup said:

M.C. Swag said:

shack009 said:

Zachary Klement said:

dave94 said:

Zachary Klement said:


Phew! Good thing the Mavs dumped him for a 30 year old. AlIgNs WiTh OuR (injury) tImElInE.


Nico out here losing every trade
Shack or his buddy is gonna chime in and tell us why we're wrong and Caleb Martin is the secret missing key the way AD is now injury free and wayyyyy better for the Mavs than Luka.
It's called roster building. Martin is making very reasonable money for the next 4 years. Grimes was going to walk for nothing in the offseason.

Also Christie is just better than Grimes. Grimes would not have been in the Mavs closing lineup tonight.
But Grimes is better and younger than Caleb Martin. Like...paying more money for a better, younger player is reasonable. If the objective is to "win in the short term", why are the Mavs building a roster with worse talent? Why would they let Grimes walk for nothing? These are fears of an incompetent FO, not traits of savvy roster building.

Nico traded Luka for AD (an older, injured, less talented player)
Nico traded Grimes AND A VALUABLE 2ND RD PICK for Caleb Martin (an older, injured, less talented player)

The roster is older and less talented today than it was 2 weeks ago and we're going to try to justify those moves as something other than incompetent management with a cheap owner?
Grimes demanded out when the Mavs traded for Christie. Either keep Grimes the rest of the year then lose him in free agency or get a similar player on decent value contract (6.5% declining to 5%)
He's a RFA. The Mavs didn't have to lose him at all.
Ahh yes, forcing players to stay that are demanding a trade then using RFA to keep them against their wishes always goes great.
1. Only Kevin O'Connor reported that he wanted out.

2. Even if I grant you that reality, a RFA tag is leverage and buys you time to negotiate. You don't ship off a better player at the first hint of adversity when you still hold all the leverage.

3. it still doesn't account for why Dallas gave up the younger, better, healthier player, and was duped, yet again, into including additional draft compensation on top, in the deal as originally constructed.
shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
M.C. Swag said:

Guitarsoup said:

M.C. Swag said:

Guitarsoup said:

M.C. Swag said:

shack009 said:

Zachary Klement said:

dave94 said:

Zachary Klement said:


Phew! Good thing the Mavs dumped him for a 30 year old. AlIgNs WiTh OuR (injury) tImElInE.


Nico out here losing every trade
Shack or his buddy is gonna chime in and tell us why we're wrong and Caleb Martin is the secret missing key the way AD is now injury free and wayyyyy better for the Mavs than Luka.
It's called roster building. Martin is making very reasonable money for the next 4 years. Grimes was going to walk for nothing in the offseason.

Also Christie is just better than Grimes. Grimes would not have been in the Mavs closing lineup tonight.
But Grimes is better and younger than Caleb Martin. Like...paying more money for a better, younger player is reasonable. If the objective is to "win in the short term", why are the Mavs building a roster with worse talent? Why would they let Grimes walk for nothing? These are fears of an incompetent FO, not traits of savvy roster building.

Nico traded Luka for AD (an older, injured, less talented player)
Nico traded Grimes AND A VALUABLE 2ND RD PICK for Caleb Martin (an older, injured, less talented player)

The roster is older and less talented today than it was 2 weeks ago and we're going to try to justify those moves as something other than incompetent management with a cheap owner?
Grimes demanded out when the Mavs traded for Christie. Either keep Grimes the rest of the year then lose him in free agency or get a similar player on decent value contract (6.5% declining to 5%)
He's a RFA. The Mavs didn't have to lose him at all.
Ahh yes, forcing players to stay that are demanding a trade then using RFA to keep them against their wishes always goes great.
1. Only Kevin O'Connor reported that he wanted out.

2. Even if I grant you that reality, a RFA tag is leverage and buys you time to negotiate. You don't ship off a better player at the first hint of adversity when you still hold all the leverage.

3. it still doesn't account for why Dallas gave up the younger, better, healthier player, and was duped, yet again, into including additional draft compensation on top, in the deal as originally constructed.
1. One of the best NBA guys reported it. Cool.

2. Grimes was not going to come back with Christie here. He was buried. He was also going to get too much money for the Mavs to match. Somebody trying to reach the floor would pay him. He also didn't want to be here. You do the agent/player a favor and you hope that it comes back around for you later with another player with that agent.

3. "Better" is absolutely debatable. Grimes has some Josh Green to him. Grimes was conspicuously DNP-CD'd for a game in December because Kidd was tired of the YOLO ball. He's a better scorer than Martin, but he's probably not as good a defender and Martin can guard much bigger players than Grimes can. Martin has also had playoff success and Grimes has never been there. I do agree that I'm not sure why the Mavs had to throw in the pick. It probably wasn't going to lead to a solid rotational player, but still seems weird to have to give it up.

I think people just want to be mad and are avoiding the bigger picture to justify additional anger.
dave94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
M.C. Swag said:

Guitarsoup said:

M.C. Swag said:

Guitarsoup said:

M.C. Swag said:

shack009 said:

Zachary Klement said:

dave94 said:

Zachary Klement said:


Phew! Good thing the Mavs dumped him for a 30 year old. AlIgNs WiTh OuR (injury) tImElInE.


Nico out here losing every trade
Shack or his buddy is gonna chime in and tell us why we're wrong and Caleb Martin is the secret missing key the way AD is now injury free and wayyyyy better for the Mavs than Luka.
It's called roster building. Martin is making very reasonable money for the next 4 years. Grimes was going to walk for nothing in the offseason.

Also Christie is just better than Grimes. Grimes would not have been in the Mavs closing lineup tonight.
But Grimes is better and younger than Caleb Martin. Like...paying more money for a better, younger player is reasonable. If the objective is to "win in the short term", why are the Mavs building a roster with worse talent? Why would they let Grimes walk for nothing? These are fears of an incompetent FO, not traits of savvy roster building.

Nico traded Luka for AD (an older, injured, less talented player)
Nico traded Grimes AND A VALUABLE 2ND RD PICK for Caleb Martin (an older, injured, less talented player)

The roster is older and less talented today than it was 2 weeks ago and we're going to try to justify those moves as something other than incompetent management with a cheap owner?
Grimes demanded out when the Mavs traded for Christie. Either keep Grimes the rest of the year then lose him in free agency or get a similar player on decent value contract (6.5% declining to 5%)
He's a RFA. The Mavs didn't have to lose him at all.
Ahh yes, forcing players to stay that are demanding a trade then using RFA to keep them against their wishes always goes great.
1. Only Kevin O'Connor reported that he wanted out.

2. Even if I grant you that reality, a RFA tag is leverage and buys you time to negotiate. You don't ship off a better player at the first hint of adversity when you still hold all the leverage.

3. it still doesn't account for why Dallas gave up the younger, better, healthier player, and was duped, yet again, into including additional draft compensation on top, in the deal as originally constructed.
Not to mention the ONLY reason that Christie was here was because of the idiotic notion of trading away Luka.
mavsfan4ever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yep, so not only did we get nothing close to what we should have in the Luka trade and had to give up a 2nd in that trade...but that trade also forced us to trade a better/younger player for an older/injured player, PLUS give up a valuable 2nd in a later trade. And the better/younger player we gave up is a scorer, which is what we need with Luka gone. We don't need any more defenders that can defend larger guys.

So the Luka trade is even worse than it initially seemed.

NICO
zgolfz85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Well it doesn't help that the national pundits are still point blank saying you just don't do this. Every time I go to or from work on the commute, or hop in the truck for lunch, one of the national radio broadcasts is talking about this trade. They're still clowning on the Mavs and 2 weeks later and even after a subpar Luka Laker game (game 2 so lol), we're still headline news. I've even heard respected national media members go into various conspiracies, including wondering about possible internal organization infidelity issues. That's how insane this trade is to everyone on the outside.

And, now you've got various GMs around the league starting to make comments about what they would've given up from their rosters if asked. The nightmare just isn't going away anytime soon.

Last night was fun, but I hope we get clarity soon on the AD and Gaff health situations so we know whether winning or losing games is better for this season. I ****ing hate having to hope for losses, so I'll hold out some hope that AD and Gaff aren't gone long term and that we can somehow weather the storm and manage to stay in the 7-10 play-in grouping until we hear otherwise.
shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Such a strange way to look at it. It's worse than it seems because we gave up pick number 40 to get another decent player for a guy who was now redundant here?

The trade isn't better than we initially thought because Christie is much better than we thought?

I realize it's probably hard for people to hurdle "better" in regards to the Luka trade… But most people had no idea who Christie was and now you can see he is a starter-on-a-good-team caliber player.
shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
dave94 said:

M.C. Swag said:

Guitarsoup said:

M.C. Swag said:

Guitarsoup said:

M.C. Swag said:

shack009 said:

Zachary Klement said:

dave94 said:

Zachary Klement said:


Phew! Good thing the Mavs dumped him for a 30 year old. AlIgNs WiTh OuR (injury) tImElInE.


Nico out here losing every trade
Shack or his buddy is gonna chime in and tell us why we're wrong and Caleb Martin is the secret missing key the way AD is now injury free and wayyyyy better for the Mavs than Luka.
It's called roster building. Martin is making very reasonable money for the next 4 years. Grimes was going to walk for nothing in the offseason.

Also Christie is just better than Grimes. Grimes would not have been in the Mavs closing lineup tonight.
But Grimes is better and younger than Caleb Martin. Like...paying more money for a better, younger player is reasonable. If the objective is to "win in the short term", why are the Mavs building a roster with worse talent? Why would they let Grimes walk for nothing? These are fears of an incompetent FO, not traits of savvy roster building.

Nico traded Luka for AD (an older, injured, less talented player)
Nico traded Grimes AND A VALUABLE 2ND RD PICK for Caleb Martin (an older, injured, less talented player)

The roster is older and less talented today than it was 2 weeks ago and we're going to try to justify those moves as something other than incompetent management with a cheap owner?
Grimes demanded out when the Mavs traded for Christie. Either keep Grimes the rest of the year then lose him in free agency or get a similar player on decent value contract (6.5% declining to 5%)
He's a RFA. The Mavs didn't have to lose him at all.
Ahh yes, forcing players to stay that are demanding a trade then using RFA to keep them against their wishes always goes great.
1. Only Kevin O'Connor reported that he wanted out.

2. Even if I grant you that reality, a RFA tag is leverage and buys you time to negotiate. You don't ship off a better player at the first hint of adversity when you still hold all the leverage.

3. it still doesn't account for why Dallas gave up the younger, better, healthier player, and was duped, yet again, into including additional draft compensation on top, in the deal as originally constructed.
Not to mention the ONLY reason that Christie was here was because of the idiotic notion of trading away Luka.


Brilliant insight that nobody realized until you pointed it out.
Zachary Klement
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

I love Kai.
M.C. Swag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
shack009 said:

M.C. Swag said:

Guitarsoup said:

M.C. Swag said:

Guitarsoup said:

M.C. Swag said:

shack009 said:

Zachary Klement said:

dave94 said:

Zachary Klement said:


Phew! Good thing the Mavs dumped him for a 30 year old. AlIgNs WiTh OuR (injury) tImElInE.


Nico out here losing every trade
Shack or his buddy is gonna chime in and tell us why we're wrong and Caleb Martin is the secret missing key the way AD is now injury free and wayyyyy better for the Mavs than Luka.
It's called roster building. Martin is making very reasonable money for the next 4 years. Grimes was going to walk for nothing in the offseason.

Also Christie is just better than Grimes. Grimes would not have been in the Mavs closing lineup tonight.
But Grimes is better and younger than Caleb Martin. Like...paying more money for a better, younger player is reasonable. If the objective is to "win in the short term", why are the Mavs building a roster with worse talent? Why would they let Grimes walk for nothing? These are fears of an incompetent FO, not traits of savvy roster building.

Nico traded Luka for AD (an older, injured, less talented player)
Nico traded Grimes AND A VALUABLE 2ND RD PICK for Caleb Martin (an older, injured, less talented player)

The roster is older and less talented today than it was 2 weeks ago and we're going to try to justify those moves as something other than incompetent management with a cheap owner?
Grimes demanded out when the Mavs traded for Christie. Either keep Grimes the rest of the year then lose him in free agency or get a similar player on decent value contract (6.5% declining to 5%)
He's a RFA. The Mavs didn't have to lose him at all.
Ahh yes, forcing players to stay that are demanding a trade then using RFA to keep them against their wishes always goes great.
1. Only Kevin O'Connor reported that he wanted out.

2. Even if I grant you that reality, a RFA tag is leverage and buys you time to negotiate. You don't ship off a better player at the first hint of adversity when you still hold all the leverage.

3. it still doesn't account for why Dallas gave up the younger, better, healthier player, and was duped, yet again, into including additional draft compensation on top, in the deal as originally constructed.
1. One of the best NBA guys reported it. Cool.

2. Grimes was not going to come back with Christie here. He was buried. He was also going to get too much money for the Mavs to match. Somebody trying to reach the floor would pay him. He also didn't want to be here. You do the agent/player a favor and you hope that it comes back around for you later with another player with that agent.

3. "Better" is absolutely debatable. Grimes has some Josh Green to him. Grimes was conspicuously DNP-CD'd for a game in December because Kidd was tired of the YOLO ball. He's a better scorer than Martin, but he's probably not as good a defender and Martin can guard much bigger players than Grimes can. Martin has also had playoff success and Grimes has never been there. I do agree that I'm not sure why the Mavs had to throw in the pick. It probably wasn't going to lead to a solid rotational player, but still seems weird to have to give it up.

I think people just want to be mad and are avoiding the bigger picture to justify additional anger.
1. Idk how you power rank reporters, KOC is simply one of them and he has almost no ties to the Dallas organization. I haven't seen a single other local or national reporter back that claim. Additionally it was never a point you or anyone else used when evaluating the Grimes/Martin trade.

2. Buried? Even with Christie, this team is light in the backcourt. Hardy is playing his way off the team. Dinwiddie AND Exum are on expiring deals and at least 1 is definitely gone after this year (Exum hasn't been healthy at all either). And your only reliable backcourt players this season are Klay and Kyrie who are old with significant injury history. I think we've already established that Nico is great at doing other people favors. I think it's time he cash in a few for THIS TEAM.

3. Martin had 1 fluky playoff run 3(?) 4(?) years ago? Otherwise he's a 29 year old replacement level rotation player. Grimes is 24(!!!) and showing massive improvement this year and is already more productive than any season Martin has played thus far. But at least you agree that the mavs at WORST traded a player of equivalent value but were compelled to pay a heavier price for (reasons)? Glad we agree on that asset mismanagement.

The bigger picture? The WHOLE roster was constructed around Luka. The Mavs traded multiple FRPs to get players that accentuated Luka's strengths (rim rolling bigs with space shooting perimeter players) and limited his weaknesses (rim protection, versatile defenders). A WORSE VERSION OF THIS ROSTER WAS IN THE FINALS 8 MONTHS AGO. Replacing Green, THJ, and DJJ with Klay, Naji, and Grimes was a perfect tweak and WAS WORKING when healthy. Nico blew that up for 'win now' reasons that are so insane to comprehend that people find conspiracy theories more plausible. So ya, I'm mad because the entire thought process is MADDENING.
Zachary Klement
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Not great.
M.C. Swag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And if you think Mavs fans are unreasonably mad now, wait until the inevitable Kyrie injury. He's played 5 straight games of 40+ minutes on a compromised back. This isn't sustainable and everyone except Nico knows it. Trading Luka was bad enough but without Grimes, that's 1 less ballhandler. 1 less release valve for Kyrie and now he must be the primary ball handler not just every game, but for every minute.

His body will fail and then what?
shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Martin thing was less than 2 years ago in the 2023 playoffs.

I realize that whole thing was just you raging, but wanted to point out for others that the Caleb Martin thing was not all that long ago. I would absolutely rather have him than Grimes on my playoff team, if you made me choose in a vacuum.

I understand that people want to be mad and have forgotten everything about basketball or even how to look things up just so they can further justify their anger. We're all upset about the trade. There's no need to forget how the NBA works or forget basic facts just so you can be more angry than is necessary.
M.C. Swag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Zachary Klement said:


Not great.
Lol great timing to my post above. Right on cue.
M.C. Swag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
shack009 said:

The Martin thing was less than 2 years ago in the 2023 playoffs.

I realize that whole thing was just you raging, but wanted to point out for others that the Caleb Martin thing was not all that long ago. I would absolutely rather have him than Grimes on my playoff team, if you made me choose in a vacuum.

I understand that people want to be mad and have forgotten everything about basketball or even how to look things up just so they can further justify their anger. We're all upset about the trade. There's no need to forget how the NBA works or forget basic facts just so you can be more angry than is necessary.
Cool, he did something 1 time in his career, 2 years ago (not 3 like I was remembering). Sorry that doesn't negate any of my points.
shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
M.C. Swag said:

And if you think Mavs fans are unreasonably mad now, wait until the inevitable Kyrie injury. He's played 5 straight games of 40+ minutes on a compromised back. This isn't sustainable and everyone except Nico knows it. Trading Luka was bad enough but without Grimes, that's 1 less ballhandler. 1 less release valve for Kyrie and now he must be the primary ball handler not just every game, but for every minute.

His body will fail and then what?


Grimes is not a good ball handler. Come on man, don't just make stuff up to be more angry than you already are.

I agree with you on Kyrie. It's part of the reason why I would understand if they tank the season.
M.C. Swag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
shack009 said:

M.C. Swag said:

And if you think Mavs fans are unreasonably mad now, wait until the inevitable Kyrie injury. He's played 5 straight games of 40+ minutes on a compromised back. This isn't sustainable and everyone except Nico knows it. Trading Luka was bad enough but without Grimes, that's 1 less ballhandler. 1 less release valve for Kyrie and now he must be the primary ball handler not just every game, but for every minute.

His body will fail and then what?


Grimes is not a good ball handler. Come on man, don't just make stuff up to be more angry than you already are.

I agree with you on Kyrie. It's part of the reason why I would understand if they tank the season.
He's not a bad ball handler. Like what are you talking about? Talk about making stuff up. Our own clown GM even said so.

shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
*Spends a week insulting Nico's credibility*

"Look what Nico said about him."

Of course Nico is going to say that when we sign him. Is he going to say we signed a bad ball handler?

I know you watched the games and there is no way you think Grimes is a plus dribbler. He ran the offense at times out of necessity, but let's not act like he has a super tight handle.
M.C. Swag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
shack009 said:

*Spends a week insulting Nico's credibility*

"Look what Nico said about him."
Are you interested in a discussion? or just making quippy retorts?

I don't need Nico the clown's opinion because I have eyes and saw Grims play PG for this team a month ago. Ive seen him operate a PnR. I've seen him paint corners to open shooters after penetrating the lane. You have the audacity to say my "rage" is leading me to make stuff up instead of engaging in the actual substance of my argument. Grimes absolutely was a 'jack of all trades' type player that absolutely could competently run an offense in a pinch for a few minutes to get Kyrie much needed rest.

But instead of taking my point, because my memory of Caleb Martin's playoff performance was off by 1 year, you want to take that and use it brush any substantive criticism of Nico's moves as simply 'blind rage.'

zgolfz85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Listened to the latest rusillo pod on way back from lunch. Legs was spot on. The national talking heads are more aligned with the continual outrage portion of the fanbase. They get it.

When Tim Legler argues that us getting a couple titles without Luka likely wouldn't matter as much as keeping Luka…there ya go. At least there's plenty of affirming content out there. Makes me feel more sane to still be this pissed/stunned.
dave94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
shack009 said:

dave94 said:

M.C. Swag said:

Guitarsoup said:

M.C. Swag said:

Guitarsoup said:

M.C. Swag said:

shack009 said:

Zachary Klement said:

dave94 said:

Zachary Klement said:


Phew! Good thing the Mavs dumped him for a 30 year old. AlIgNs WiTh OuR (injury) tImElInE.


Nico out here losing every trade
Shack or his buddy is gonna chime in and tell us why we're wrong and Caleb Martin is the secret missing key the way AD is now injury free and wayyyyy better for the Mavs than Luka.
It's called roster building. Martin is making very reasonable money for the next 4 years. Grimes was going to walk for nothing in the offseason.

Also Christie is just better than Grimes. Grimes would not have been in the Mavs closing lineup tonight.
But Grimes is better and younger than Caleb Martin. Like...paying more money for a better, younger player is reasonable. If the objective is to "win in the short term", why are the Mavs building a roster with worse talent? Why would they let Grimes walk for nothing? These are fears of an incompetent FO, not traits of savvy roster building.

Nico traded Luka for AD (an older, injured, less talented player)
Nico traded Grimes AND A VALUABLE 2ND RD PICK for Caleb Martin (an older, injured, less talented player)

The roster is older and less talented today than it was 2 weeks ago and we're going to try to justify those moves as something other than incompetent management with a cheap owner?
Grimes demanded out when the Mavs traded for Christie. Either keep Grimes the rest of the year then lose him in free agency or get a similar player on decent value contract (6.5% declining to 5%)
He's a RFA. The Mavs didn't have to lose him at all.
Ahh yes, forcing players to stay that are demanding a trade then using RFA to keep them against their wishes always goes great.
1. Only Kevin O'Connor reported that he wanted out.

2. Even if I grant you that reality, a RFA tag is leverage and buys you time to negotiate. You don't ship off a better player at the first hint of adversity when you still hold all the leverage.

3. it still doesn't account for why Dallas gave up the younger, better, healthier player, and was duped, yet again, into including additional draft compensation on top, in the deal as originally constructed.
Not to mention the ONLY reason that Christie was here was because of the idiotic notion of trading away Luka.


Brilliant insight that nobody realized until you pointed it out.
Today was the first day most of us heard that Grimes allegedly wanted out because of the Christie acquisition, but okay!
PatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
dave94 said:

shack009 said:

dave94 said:

M.C. Swag said:

Guitarsoup said:

M.C. Swag said:

Guitarsoup said:

M.C. Swag said:

shack009 said:

Zachary Klement said:

dave94 said:

Zachary Klement said:


Phew! Good thing the Mavs dumped him for a 30 year old. AlIgNs WiTh OuR (injury) tImElInE.


Nico out here losing every trade
Shack or his buddy is gonna chime in and tell us why we're wrong and Caleb Martin is the secret missing key the way AD is now injury free and wayyyyy better for the Mavs than Luka.
It's called roster building. Martin is making very reasonable money for the next 4 years. Grimes was going to walk for nothing in the offseason.

Also Christie is just better than Grimes. Grimes would not have been in the Mavs closing lineup tonight.
But Grimes is better and younger than Caleb Martin. Like...paying more money for a better, younger player is reasonable. If the objective is to "win in the short term", why are the Mavs building a roster with worse talent? Why would they let Grimes walk for nothing? These are fears of an incompetent FO, not traits of savvy roster building.

Nico traded Luka for AD (an older, injured, less talented player)
Nico traded Grimes AND A VALUABLE 2ND RD PICK for Caleb Martin (an older, injured, less talented player)

The roster is older and less talented today than it was 2 weeks ago and we're going to try to justify those moves as something other than incompetent management with a cheap owner?
Grimes demanded out when the Mavs traded for Christie. Either keep Grimes the rest of the year then lose him in free agency or get a similar player on decent value contract (6.5% declining to 5%)
He's a RFA. The Mavs didn't have to lose him at all.
Ahh yes, forcing players to stay that are demanding a trade then using RFA to keep them against their wishes always goes great.
1. Only Kevin O'Connor reported that he wanted out.

2. Even if I grant you that reality, a RFA tag is leverage and buys you time to negotiate. You don't ship off a better player at the first hint of adversity when you still hold all the leverage.

3. it still doesn't account for why Dallas gave up the younger, better, healthier player, and was duped, yet again, into including additional draft compensation on top, in the deal as originally constructed.
Not to mention the ONLY reason that Christie was here was because of the idiotic notion of trading away Luka.


Brilliant insight that nobody realized until you pointed it out.
Today was the first day most of us heard that Grimes allegedly wanted out because of the Christie acquisition, but okay!
you just dont understand baskeball
Zachary Klement
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
shack009 said:

*Spends a week insulting Nico's credibility*

"Look what Nico said about him."

Of course Nico is going to say that when we sign him. Is he going to say we signed a bad ball handler?

I know you watched the games and there is no way you think Grimes is a plus dribbler. He ran the offense at times out of necessity, but let's not act like he has a super tight handle.
Does he just blindly say every player the Mavericks bring in is a good ball handler?
shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Zachary Klement said:

shack009 said:

*Spends a week insulting Nico's credibility*

"Look what Nico said about him."

Of course Nico is going to say that when we sign him. Is he going to say we signed a bad ball handler?

I know you watched the games and there is no way you think Grimes is a plus dribbler. He ran the offense at times out of necessity, but let's not act like he has a super tight handle.
Does he just blindly say every player the Mavericks bring in is a good ball handler?
It's boilerplate for any guard. He also didn't say "good," I believe the word was "versatile." That is definitely not the same as "good."
Zachary Klement
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
shack009 said:

Zachary Klement said:

shack009 said:

*Spends a week insulting Nico's credibility*

"Look what Nico said about him."

Of course Nico is going to say that when we sign him. Is he going to say we signed a bad ball handler?

I know you watched the games and there is no way you think Grimes is a plus dribbler. He ran the offense at times out of necessity, but let's not act like he has a super tight handle.
Does he just blindly say every player the Mavericks bring in is a good ball handler?
It's boilerplate for any guard. He also didn't say "good," I believe the word was "versatile." That is definitely not the same as "good."
Ah, I will consult you next time I need a Nico Harrison translator.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.