I'm a freebie freeloader. No ignore lol.
Manchester United 26-27 Thread
40,701 Views |
1018 Replies |
Last: 5 min ago by Furlock Bones
The way City is playing you would not know they were at 10 men.
Dalot determined to make this an even match. Having a complete stinker
If there's any team that's going to play worse when up a man, it's us.
His headed clearance back to the middle of the pitch 5 minutes ago was so bad.
Dalot is easily the worst one out there.
I would make a very creative change at HT and take him off for Sesko and go hard at them.
I would make a very creative change at HT and take him off for Sesko and go hard at them.
Someone would need to go off that doesn't really deserve a hook, but could kind of use a real striker like Sesko…
Well fair enough. Maybe if you subbed Dalot for Sesko lol
Never seen a team play so complacent after going up a player (or a goal). The lack of intensity and urgency we show when we have an advantage is mind blowing
Second time Donnarumma had been beaten and been saved by the post.
We need Sesko.
Cunha playing false 9 ain't it
MF is it close enough to 60 to put the striker on?
Now Dorgu heading back into the middle of the pitch nearly costs us a goal.
F
Ah, actually it does cost us a goal.
That's a goal
Pathetic
I'm going to need to see the line because that looks off.
Deflection off a United player
I guess I'm lacking the requisite knowledge because I thought that didn't matter unless the defender intentionally played the ball.
**** if I know these days. The more they try and "clear up the rules" the more it makes no sense.
Well according to VAR it's just that Dorgu's foot legitimately kept it on and now I have to reevaluate my perception of time and space because he still looks off.
Also city are cutting us up now.
deflections don't reset OS.Furlock Bones said:
Deflection off a United player
There is a legit case that Enzo made a legitimate try to play the ball from an OS position. Normally that means he had to touch it at this level.
Mathguy64 said:deflections don't reset OS.Furlock Bones said:
Deflection off a United player
We are talking about a league that claimed there was a 3 inch variance when giving a Liverpool goal last year.
Anyway, no chance we score 2 against a talented team that can defend properly.
City's backline is just light years better than ours
Carrick is certainly not looking up to the task at this point. Huge regression so far in league play
City are in United's heads. United players needlessly fouling. Enzo stirring **** and they taking the bait.
One of the criticism's of Carrick at Middlesborough was that everything looked fine until they got to the final third. Kind of seeing that now. United overperformed their xG under Carrick last season.
We'll see what happens but 4 points in 4 games and losing at home to City is way below acceptable especially when you can't really say any of it was unlucky.
We'll see what happens but 4 points in 4 games and losing at home to City is way below acceptable especially when you can't really say any of it was unlucky.
Out of the fight in 4 matches.
We won't win another league or CL with the Glazers.
Enzo wasn't trying to play the ball while diving to play the ball. Ok.
Featured Stories
See All
Lightning-quick Edwards provides a glimmer of light for the future
by Olin Buchanan
14:28
2h ago
936
5:30
2h ago
637
2:53
6h ago
881
Elko sees encouraging signs as A&M looks internally
by Olin Buchanan
Orlando Ayala Cant Read
Sumlin...Every A&M Football Coach Has Had An Issue
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
79
MigratingCoconuts
Elko On Hart - getting roasted in X/Twitter comments
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
48