Uni-party
No winky face required. Truth.P.H. Dexippus said:
The NRA saw their members flocking to the other 3 and decided they ought to put in the minimal effort necessary to feign caring.
These people are morons.Quote:
"Even though Congressional Republicans should take additional action to keep these and other dangerous weapons off our streets, they are instead pushing a resolution to reverse this rule and the progress we have made to enforce existing statutory requirements on these dangerous weapons," according to the White House's Statement of Administration Policy.
Thank you for your work and leadership on the this bill @Rep_Clyde!
— Gun Owners of America (@GunOwners) June 13, 2023
Without your efforts this vote would never have happened! https://t.co/1CLzFeC4pL
aggieforester05 said:These people are morons.Quote:
"Even though Congressional Republicans should take additional action to keep these and other dangerous weapons off our streets, they are instead pushing a resolution to reverse this rule and the progress we have made to enforce existing statutory requirements on these dangerous weapons," according to the White House's Statement of Administration Policy.
dodger02 said:
I know noncompliance is/was fashionable. But I just received my approval.
Submitted on 4/23.
Fingerprints mailed 4/24.
Approved 6/14.
52 days.
Quote:
Its tyranny.
Quote:
The Senate as early as next week is expected to vote to kill President Joe Biden's regulation on AR-15s fitted with pistol braces, a rule that overnight turned up to 29 million owners into felons.
Key sources following the issue said three Democratic senators are leaning toward joining a united GOP to repeal the rule that went into effect this month.
But even with the support of pro-gun Democratic Sens. Joe Manchin (WV), John Tester (MT) and Angus King (ME), it won't be enough to override a threatened Biden veto. The House passed the repeal in mid-June by a close 219-210 margin.
Still, rejection via the congressional review act process would be a major blow to Biden's liberal anti-gun agenda, a sharp rebuke to overzealous regulators at the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, and a signal to federal judges that there is support for rulings against the Biden gun control drive.
alvtimes said:
Yall are all the dummies…. didnt yall know that you can get a higher caliber bullet by adding a brace. Unanswered question to the chief tyrant tho…. what caliber is best to start with…. and after I add brace, what caliber does it become?????
Well we are waiting.gifP.H. Dexippus said:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/washington-secrets/senate-poised-to-slap-down-biden-pistol-brace-rule-in-major-defeatQuote:
The Senate as early as next week is expected to vote to kill President Joe Biden's regulation on AR-15s fitted with pistol braces, a rule that overnight turned up to 29 million owners into felons.
Key sources following the issue said three Democratic senators are leaning toward joining a united GOP to repeal the rule that went into effect this month.
But even with the support of pro-gun Democratic Sens. Joe Manchin (WV), John Tester (MT) and Angus King (ME), it won't be enough to override a threatened Biden veto. The House passed the repeal in mid-June by a close 219-210 margin.
Still, rejection via the congressional review act process would be a major blow to Biden's liberal anti-gun agenda, a sharp rebuke to overzealous regulators at the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, and a signal to federal judges that there is support for rulings against the Biden gun control drive.
And that fat **** jar headed Tester in MT. He runs around the state proclaiming to represent Montanans, but at the end of the day is no different than Schumer.2ndGen87 said:
shows what a real pos Manchin is. He isn't a moderate democrat, he is a complete loser.
Submitted 5/4, approved 7/4. MAGA irony.dodger02 said:
I know noncompliance is/was fashionable. But I just received my approval.
Submitted on 4/23.
Fingerprints mailed 4/24.
Approved 6/14.
52 days.
BSD said:
No. Only pistols with braces.
Quote:
The court ruled 2-1 that the ATF targeted stabilizing braces without giving the public the chance to weigh in on the regulation.
Under the Administrative Procedure Act, agencies are required to provide public notice of proposed decisions and allow people with an interest in those decisions to offer feedback.
Judge Jerry Smith noted that the ATF did provide a public comment period on the proposed rule in 2021, but that the final regulation was so different from the proposal that it amounted to "a rug-pull on the public."
Judge Don Willett agreed and added that the rule might violate Americans' Second Amendment right to bear arms.
🚨 FPC WINS 🚨
— Firearms Policy Coalition (@gunpolicy) October 3, 2023
In our Mock v. Garland ATF Pistol Brace Rule Lawsuit, the District Court has issued a Preliminary Injunction that is identical to the emergency injunction issued by the Fifth Circuit. pic.twitter.com/kWqky5QGFM