I would have gone over there 6 weeks ago and caught a subway at the brand new subway station in Tehran they just opened that is dedicated to the Blessed Virgin Mary. I've seen pictures online, it's beautiful! Would our government allow that here??
andrago94 said:
The head mullah issued a fatwa against the development of nuclear weapons and has consistently called for a nuclear free Middle East. The US just assasinated him. I support his views against the proliferation of nuclear weapons. The West is not concerned with nuclear weapons, they just need an enemy to distract from Israel's Palestinian problem. Hence, the stupid "Iran is weeks away from a nuclear weapon" schtick we have heard endlessly since Israel decided to make Iran a pariah in the 90's.
andrago94 said:
I would have gone over there 6 weeks ago and caught a subway at the brand new subway station in Tehran they just opened that is dedicated to the Blessed Virgin Mary. I've seen pictures online, it's beautiful! Would our government allow that here??
andrago94 said:
I would have gone over there 6 weeks ago and caught a subway at the brand new subway station in Tehran they just opened that is dedicated to the Blessed Virgin Mary. I've seen pictures online, it's beautiful! Would our government allow that here??
andrago94 said:
I care about all Iranians. That's why I oppose bombing and killing them. Do you?
andrago94 said:
I would have gone over there 6 weeks ago and caught a subway at the brand new subway station in Tehran they just opened that is dedicated to the Blessed Virgin Mary. I've seen pictures online, it's beautiful! Would our government allow that here??
Slicer97 said:andrago94 said:
I care about all Iranians. That's why I oppose bombing and killing them. Do you?
No. I don't care about them at all. I'm in favor of bombing and killing every last f'n one of them that wants to do the same to us. And no, I don't give 2 ****s about how that makes you feel.
Fatwa on developing a nuclear bomb isn't effective against the development of a nuclear bomb, nor was it intended to be. It doesn't stop progress towards one while instituted.andrago94 said:
The head mullah issued a fatwa against the development of nuclear weapons and has consistently called for a nuclear free Middle East. The US just assasinated him. I support his views against the proliferation of nuclear weapons. The West is not concerned with nuclear weapons, they just need an enemy to distract from Israel's Palestinian problem. Hence, the stupid "Iran is weeks away from a nuclear weapon" schtick we have heard endlessly since Israel decided to make Iran a pariah in the 90's.
andrago94 said:
I care about all Iranians. That's why I oppose bombing and killing them. Do you?

andrago94 said:
US foreign policy (Democrat and Republican) must have been written by a child. The US goes in wreaks havoc for years then leaves and accepts no responsibility for the consequences of its actions. Rinse and repeat.
andrago94 said:
I would have gone over there 6 weeks ago and caught a subway at the brand new subway station in Tehran they just opened that is dedicated to the Blessed Virgin Mary. I've seen pictures online, it's beautiful! Would our government allow that here??
FobTies said:
My apologies for posting a pic of Lindsey Graham with Bibi, holding a sign that reads "more for Israel". I now see that is provocative and a triggering micro aggression. I won't do it again.
But thats still really the core of the division and politcal fallout relevant to this thread. Israel is our best western ME ally, and they indirectly got attacked by Iran. Then Iran decided not to give in to US demands in negotiations. Thats the reason for Epic Fury. This is clear and undeniable, and the argument could be made its sufficient.
We should be debating the merits of this war. next steps, and future aid to rebuild Israel. But debate has been stifled bc its all been reduced to Iran is a existential nuke threat. Like how we need to accept any cost to prevent Climate Change extinction. Its a very effective narrative we see on both the left and right. Time and time again it ends up screwing over the taxpayer. Those of us who drop in to try to expose that dynamic, get labeled "isolationist/TDS".
I hope there are young ags in here who can ignore the hyper partisan noise, and demand transparency from gov on war expenditure. We arent toddlers that need to be spooked into compliance, whether its COVID or new wars.
deddog said:andrago94 said:
US foreign policy (Democrat and Republican) must have been written by a child. The US goes in wreaks havoc for years then leaves and accepts no responsibility for the consequences of its actions. Rinse and repeat.
Sure.
But nations have a choice.
Iran for example chose to kill thousands of its own citizens, Christian and Muslim.
That isn't Americas problem. That is an Islam problem. It is the religion of Satan, so I would expect no less.
Japan and West Germany both faced far greater devastation at US hands. I don't remember them killing their own citizens.
Islam and Socialism have killed more people in the last century than anybody else. And it isn't close.
ShaggySLC said:deddog said:andrago94 said:
US foreign policy (Democrat and Republican) must have been written by a child. The US goes in wreaks havoc for years then leaves and accepts no responsibility for the consequences of its actions. Rinse and repeat.
Sure.
But nations have a choice.
Iran for example chose to kill thousands of its own citizens, Christian and Muslim.
That isn't Americas problem. That is an Islam problem. It is the religion of Satan, so I would expect no less.
Japan and West Germany both faced far greater devastation at US hands. I don't remember them killing their own citizens.
Islam and Socialism have killed more people in the last century than anybody else. And it isn't close.
Not sure on Japan, but they'd kill themselves if they let down Japan. Germany definitely killed a lot of their own citizens. They'd hang dissenters in the public square.
AustinAg2K said:ShaggySLC said:deddog said:andrago94 said:
US foreign policy (Democrat and Republican) must have been written by a child. The US goes in wreaks havoc for years then leaves and accepts no responsibility for the consequences of its actions. Rinse and repeat.
Sure.
But nations have a choice.
Iran for example chose to kill thousands of its own citizens, Christian and Muslim.
That isn't Americas problem. That is an Islam problem. It is the religion of Satan, so I would expect no less.
Japan and West Germany both faced far greater devastation at US hands. I don't remember them killing their own citizens.
Islam and Socialism have killed more people in the last century than anybody else. And it isn't close.
Not sure on Japan, but they'd kill themselves if they let down Japan. Germany definitely killed a lot of their own citizens. They'd hang dissenters in the public square.
They also put their own citizens in gas chambers. Millions of them.
UPDATE: We stand corrected. There are two new tankers loading there right now according to this morning's satellite imagery.
— TankerTrackers.com, Inc. (@TankerTrackers) March 14, 2026
JUST IN: Hamas calls on Iran to stop attacking neighboring countries.
— Polymarket (@Polymarket) March 14, 2026
nortex97 said:UPDATE: We stand corrected. There are two new tankers loading there right now according to this morning's satellite imagery.
— TankerTrackers.com, Inc. (@TankerTrackers) March 14, 2026
Pathetic.
FobTies said:
My apologies for posting a pic of Lindsey Graham with Bibi, holding a sign that reads ....
.......
......
...... Those of us who drop in to try to expose that dynamic, get labeled "isolationist/TDS".
I hope there are young ags in here who can ignore the hyper partisan noise,
Bellard said:
Trump says all military targets all are obliterated but the Straits Hormuz are still closed and oil is $100/barrel
What is Trumps end game? Iran still has upper hand as long as they control the oil flow
Phatbob said:
Nukes? Who knows how close they were, I don't care. Dealing with Iran now while the repercussions are the lowest they can be is the right call.
Bellard said:
Trump says all military targets all are obliterated but the Straits Hormuz are still closed and oil is $100/barrel
What is Trumps end game? Iran still has upper hand as long as they control the oil flowthey deny everybody else
nortex97 said:
Sure, militarily. But we don't have to allow the Chicoms to access it and continue paying the IRGC, politically speaking.
BREAKING: The Shia cleric who was filmed at Pearson International Airport in Toronto, arriving from Iran together with his family, has been identified as Hojjatoleslam Morteza Tayyebi. He has recently obtained Canadian citizenship. Unfortunately, the government of Canada is… https://t.co/Ecu6nJjHnU pic.twitter.com/ViBhL8jQwQ
— Babak Taghvaee - The Crisis Watch (@BabakTaghvaee1) March 14, 2026
FobTies said:Phatbob said:
Nukes? Who knows how close they were, I don't care. Dealing with Iran now while the repercussions are the lowest they can be is the right call.
Ok, thats a legit argument. I have no problem with our gov saying Iran has been Fing Around for decades in US negotiations while sponsoring terror. Then we can debate how many 100s of billions in bombing Iran and rebuilding Israel is worth it. In fact thats what the rhetoric was in beginning. Rubio and others saying "Iran was playing games" and Hegseth saying "they FAFO with their negotiations".
You seem to be acknowledging that our gov is now fear mongering with existential nuke threat rhetoric to justify EpFury. You dont care about that when it comes to ME war, but probably do care when it comes to COVID or Climate Change. I care about our Gov lying to the American people, all the time, regardless of what its about...but care most of all when its to add major debt to our balance sheet.
deddog said:Bellard said:
Trump says all military targets all are obliterated but the Straits Hormuz are still closed and oil is $100/barrel
What is Trumps end game? Iran still has upper hand as long as they control the oil flowthey deny everybody else
Iran controls NOTHING,
We are just not denying shipping unlike the Iranians. But we absolutely can.
So initially, it was said that Risk/insurance companies weren;t covering these ships.
So who's covering the Indian and Chinese ships through?
FobTies said:Phatbob said:
Nukes? Who knows how close they were, I don't care. Dealing with Iran now while the repercussions are the lowest they can be is the right call.
Ok, thats a legit argument. I have no problem with our gov saying Iran has been Fing Around for decades in US negotiations while sponsoring terror. Then we can debate how many 100s of billions in bombing Iran and rebuilding Israel is worth it. In fact thats what the rhetoric was in beginning. Rubio and others saying "Iran was playing games" and Hegseth saying "they FAFO with their negotiations".
You seem to be acknowledging that our gov is now fear mongering with existential nuke threat rhetoric to justify EpFury. You dont care about that when it comes to ME war, but probably do care when it comes to COVID or Climate Change. I care about our Gov lying to the American people, all the time, regardless of what its about...but care most of all when its to add major debt to our balance sheet.