Political fallout and arguments regarding the US-Israeli action against Iran 022824

648,466 Views | 6608 Replies | Last: 9 min ago by YouBet
Aggie Dad Sip
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YouBet said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

YouBet said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

What is better in Iran today from an America First perspective than it was when we started this thing five months ago?


Destroyed their Navy and Air Force, reduced their ICBMs 50-65%, made them much poorer than they were which limits terrorism funding abroad, delayed their nuclear ambitions by X.

Softball question.

Yet, we're still in the same position we were before.


You asked what was better and I gave you receipts.

There are also things that are worse - Hormuz.

And the things you said that are better are based solely on what our current administration tells us. I've been hearing that Iran's military has been destroyed for over a year. However, my lying eyes tell me that's not the case.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggie Dad Sip said:

YouBet said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

YouBet said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

What is better in Iran today from an America First perspective than it was when we started this thing five months ago?


Destroyed their Navy and Air Force, reduced their ICBMs 50-65%, made them much poorer than they were which limits terrorism funding abroad, delayed their nuclear ambitions by X.

Softball question.

Yet, we're still in the same position we were before.


You asked what was better and I gave you receipts.

There are also things that are worse - Hormuz.

And the things you said that are better are based solely on what our current administration tells us. I've been hearing that Iran's military has been destroyed for over a year. However, my lying eyes tell me that's not the case.


I don't think that you have heard that other than their nuke capability. This fun hasn't been going on for over a year.

It's been reported by media as well as the government from all sides what I've shared. I'm quite sure all of MSM would be saying something different if it wasn't accurate.
Aggie Dad Sip
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YouBet said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

YouBet said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

YouBet said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

What is better in Iran today from an America First perspective than it was when we started this thing five months ago?


Destroyed their Navy and Air Force, reduced their ICBMs 50-65%, made them much poorer than they were which limits terrorism funding abroad, delayed their nuclear ambitions by X.

Softball question.

Yet, we're still in the same position we were before.


You asked what was better and I gave you receipts.

There are also things that are worse - Hormuz.

And the things you said that are better are based solely on what our current administration tells us. I've been hearing that Iran's military has been destroyed for over a year. However, my lying eyes tell me that's not the case.


I don't think that you have heard that other than their nuke capability. This fun hasn't been going on for over a year.

It's been reported by media as well as the government from all sides what I've shared. I'm quite sure all of MSM would be saying something different if it wasn't accurate.

Ok, let's say that the Trump Administration never claimed we destroyed Iran's military capability until…what the heck…June of this year. June 7th to be precise. That was almost eight weeks ago. Is it true or not?
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggie Dad Sip said:

YouBet said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

YouBet said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

YouBet said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

What is better in Iran today from an America First perspective than it was when we started this thing five months ago?


Destroyed their Navy and Air Force, reduced their ICBMs 50-65%, made them much poorer than they were which limits terrorism funding abroad, delayed their nuclear ambitions by X.

Softball question.

Yet, we're still in the same position we were before.


You asked what was better and I gave you receipts.

There are also things that are worse - Hormuz.

And the things you said that are better are based solely on what our current administration tells us. I've been hearing that Iran's military has been destroyed for over a year. However, my lying eyes tell me that's not the case.


I don't think that you have heard that other than their nuke capability. This fun hasn't been going on for over a year.

It's been reported by media as well as the government from all sides what I've shared. I'm quite sure all of MSM would be saying something different if it wasn't accurate.

Ok, let's say that the Trump Administration never claimed we destroyed Iran's military capability until…what the heck…June of this year. June 7th to be precise. That was almost eight weeks ago. Is it true or not?


8 weeks <> over 1 year ago. That is incredible goal post moving.
Keyno
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YouBet said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

YouBet said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

YouBet said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

What is better in Iran today from an America First perspective than it was when we started this thing five months ago?


Destroyed their Navy and Air Force, reduced their ICBMs 50-65%, made them much poorer than they were which limits terrorism funding abroad, delayed their nuclear ambitions by X.

Softball question.

Yet, we're still in the same position we were before.


You asked what was better and I gave you receipts.

There are also things that are worse - Hormuz.

And the things you said that are better are based solely on what our current administration tells us. I've been hearing that Iran's military has been destroyed for over a year. However, my lying eyes tell me that's not the case.


I don't think that you have heard that other than their nuke capability. This fun hasn't been going on for over a year.

It's been reported by media as well as the government from all sides what I've shared. I'm quite sure all of MSM would be saying something different if it wasn't accurate.

Trump sometimes erroneously claims that "Iran's military has been destroyed". I am not sure if he does that because he is conflating army with navy, is lying, or is just confused because he is 80. Regardless, he is incorrect.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Keyno said:

YouBet said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

YouBet said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

YouBet said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

What is better in Iran today from an America First perspective than it was when we started this thing five months ago?


Destroyed their Navy and Air Force, reduced their ICBMs 50-65%, made them much poorer than they were which limits terrorism funding abroad, delayed their nuclear ambitions by X.

Softball question.

Yet, we're still in the same position we were before.


You asked what was better and I gave you receipts.

There are also things that are worse - Hormuz.

And the things you said that are better are based solely on what our current administration tells us. I've been hearing that Iran's military has been destroyed for over a year. However, my lying eyes tell me that's not the case.


I don't think that you have heard that other than their nuke capability. This fun hasn't been going on for over a year.

It's been reported by media as well as the government from all sides what I've shared. I'm quite sure all of MSM would be saying something different if it wasn't accurate.

Trump sometimes erroneously claims that "Iran's military has been destroyed". I am not sure if he does that because he is conflating army with navy, is lying, or is just confused because he is 80. Regardless, he is incorrect.


Yeah, I've heard him say the same thing. It's bluster.
Aggie Dad Sip
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YouBet said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

YouBet said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

YouBet said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

YouBet said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

What is better in Iran today from an America First perspective than it was when we started this thing five months ago?


Destroyed their Navy and Air Force, reduced their ICBMs 50-65%, made them much poorer than they were which limits terrorism funding abroad, delayed their nuclear ambitions by X.

Softball question.

Yet, we're still in the same position we were before.


You asked what was better and I gave you receipts.

There are also things that are worse - Hormuz.

And the things you said that are better are based solely on what our current administration tells us. I've been hearing that Iran's military has been destroyed for over a year. However, my lying eyes tell me that's not the case.


I don't think that you have heard that other than their nuke capability. This fun hasn't been going on for over a year.

It's been reported by media as well as the government from all sides what I've shared. I'm quite sure all of MSM would be saying something different if it wasn't accurate.

Ok, let's say that the Trump Administration never claimed we destroyed Iran's military capability until…what the heck…June of this year. June 7th to be precise. That was almost eight weeks ago. Is it true or not?


8 weeks <> over 1 year ago. That is incredible goal post moving.

Yeah. I moved them up from when we said we destroyed their nuclear capability to eight weeks ago when we said we destroyed their military capability. Yet we still claim we're doing whatever the heck we're doing so they can't have the nuclear capability we destroyed over a year ago.
Keyno
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OldArmy71 said:

I wonder how much being in Trump's administration is going to be a millstone for people who want to seek other offices, including the presidency.

Do Trump's antics make Vance and Rubio look so bad that they are tarnished by being part of it all?

I have grown to admire Rubio a great deal and would hate to see his chances nationwide spoiled by being part of Trump's ****show (and I voted for Trump three times).

NVMD
HaroldShipmanAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Keyno said:

OldArmy71 said:

I wonder how much being in Trump's administration is going to be a millstone for people who want to seek other offices, including the presidency.

Do Trump's antics make Vance and Rubio look so bad that they are tarnished by being part of it all?

I have grown to admire Rubio a great deal and would hate to see his chances nationwide spoiled by being part of Trump's ****show (and I voted for Trump three times).

NVMD

lol same nonsense was said during his first term and yet here we are.
Haleyscomet50
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rubio is Israel first. That's if you believe Trump that Rubio was bought and paid for by Addlesons.. It's also if you believe the leaked emails from Israel Americans that said Rubio was bought and paid for and had been vetted by Israel. Wont be enough fox news boomers left for him to get the nomination. Same goes for Desantis. The blowback from this war will change the party.

Some may not want to believe it but Vance believes it. He will do anything to win not sure what he stands for but you can bet he will go with the position that gives him the best chance of winning. Watch his actions if you want to see where the party is heading Vance is a smart guy a old school politian with no real views just whatever gives him the best chance of winning. He knows America first Israel last is going to sale in 28.
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Rubio is Israel first.

this is very fake news.




as for 2028, the GOP nomination will be whichever person Trump endorses.
Keyno
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BMX Bandit said:

Quote:

Rubio is Israel first.

this is very fake news.




as for 2028, the GOP nomination will be whichever person Trump endorses.

Trump famously called it in 2015.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Haleyscomet50 said:

Rubio is Israel first. That's if you believe Trump that Rubio was bought and paid for by Addlesons.. It's also if you believe the leaked emails from Israel Americans that said Rubio was bought and paid for and had been vetted by Israel. Wont be enough fox news boomers left for him to get the nomination. Same goes for Desantis. The blowback from this war will change the party.

Some may not want to believe it but Vance believes it. He will do anything to win not sure what he stands for but you can bet he will go with the position that gives him the best chance of winning. Watch his actions if you want to see where the party is heading Vance is a smart guy a old school politian with no real views just whatever gives him the best chance of winning. He knows America first Israel last is going to sale in 28.


I don't believe this and will require more proof.
sts7049
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Phatbob
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YouBet said:

Haleyscomet50 said:

Rubio is Israel first. That's if you believe Trump that Rubio was bought and paid for by Addlesons.. It's also if you believe the leaked emails from Israel Americans that said Rubio was bought and paid for and had been vetted by Israel. Wont be enough fox news boomers left for him to get the nomination. Same goes for Desantis. The blowback from this war will change the party.

Some may not want to believe it but Vance believes it. He will do anything to win not sure what he stands for but you can bet he will go with the position that gives him the best chance of winning. Watch his actions if you want to see where the party is heading Vance is a smart guy a old school politian with no real views just whatever gives him the best chance of winning. He knows America first Israel last is going to sale in 28.


I don't believe this and will require more proof.

You must be under the mistaken notion that we aren't dealing with the wandering ghosts of the Qanon thread.
Texaguser17
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The irony is leftist should love Trump and the right oppose him.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
sts7049 said:




That is clown world stuff right there.
BQ78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hope he has better luck threatening the oil companies than he does with Iran.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BQ78 said:

Hope he has better luck threatening the oil companies than he does with Iran.


Hope he doesn't. Let the markets work as designed.
TxAG#2011
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sts7049 said:



Massive Biden energy from this guy
The Fall Guy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Trump getting schooled by Iran. Mad that the US is out of talks with Iran and Oman on the SOH. Just went on another rant
The Fall Guy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The world has had enough of the back and forth including Israel who basically told the US to pound sand. We had our chance
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Fall Guy said:

Trump getting schooled by Iran. Mad that the US is out of talks with Iran and Oman on the SOH. Just went on another rant


Live rant or on truth social?

Link or post by chance?
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
The Fall Guy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No Spin Ag said:

The Fall Guy said:

Trump getting schooled by Iran. Mad that the US is out of talks with Iran and Oman on the SOH. Just went on another rant


Live rant or on truth social?

Link or post by chance?


https://aje.news/mcmsi9?update=4826526
The Fall Guy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No Spin Ag said:

The Fall Guy said:

Trump getting schooled by Iran. Mad that the US is out of talks with Iran and Oman on the SOH. Just went on another rant


Live rant or on truth social?

Link or post by chance?


Trump has been on multiple media platforms telling his frustration with Iran and saying they wont come back to the table. Yes above is from Iran but they are gleefully enjoying seeing Trump get upset. They know this gets his goat
The Fall Guy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Last chance Iran. For the umpteenth time.

https://aje.news/mcmsi9?update=4826746
Agador Spartacus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Fall Guy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Oh now Iran has a new deadline of tomorrow to open the SOH. Lol. This is out of hand.

https://aje.news/mcmsi9?update=4826743
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Crowdsourcing ideas is a funny idea. I would put down that wacky "tie incendiary bombs to bats" scheme we tested in WW2.

HaroldShipmanAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PaulsBunions said:

Crowdsourcing ideas is a funny idea. I would put down that wacky "tie incendiary bombs to bats" scheme we tested in WW2.



thats totally legitimate.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Considering the sources (Hormuz Letter and CNN), you have to assume this is fake until someone legitimate corroborates.
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Source is CNN, Jerusalem Post also reported it. At this point I wouldn't be shocked if it was true.

CNN link:

https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/03/politics/us-military-iran-war-troops-punish

"We are looking for new creative and unconventional ways to pressure and punish Iran," an officer in US Central Command's intelligence branch wrote in a message sent Wednesday to a broad group of military analysts, according to a source familiar with the message. A second source also said that a senior US military officer sent the message last week soliciting new ideas for how to deal with Iran.

The crowdsourcing-style query, which military officials said was unusual over email, is one sign of the limited and potentially unpalatable options available to Trump to force Iran into a deal on his terms. Hoping to find an alternative, the official at CENTCOM kicked off the brainstorming session via email to see if anyone had a better idea. The second source said CENTCOM is looking at everything, acknowledging it needs to reevaluate the strategy.

"U.S. Central Command has a long history of thinking and working in innovative ways," Capt. Timothy Hawkins, a spokesperson for CENTCOM, said in a statement. "Admiral Cooper, in particular, reaches out to members of our great team, regardless of rank, to achieve the highest levels of operational performance possible."

The email preceded Trump's threat to launch new strikes against Iran, only to call them off over the weekend after regional officials namely Saudi Arabia's crown prince intervened by calling the president and urging him to de-escalate."
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Seems like a spokesman for CENTCOM confirmed it in a statement.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PaulsBunions said:

Seems like a spokesman for CENTCOM confirmed it in a statement.


If so, I actually have no issue with them doing this. They should exhaust all avenues. I asked my team all the way down to interns for ideas all of the time

However, I do think for this particular issue they aren't going to find any new ideas that will work. My idea for them would be to leave.

I am, of course, no expert in such matters.
First Page Refresh
Page 189 of 189
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.