Infection_Ag11 said:Texas 8&4 said:
The lecturer in question wasn't tenured
The dean was
Yet, dean wasn't fired.
Relieved of administrative duties, yes...
ETA by ur boy...
Infection_Ag11 said:Texas 8&4 said:
The lecturer in question wasn't tenured
The dean was
Tex100 said:
Predict he was given two choices
Texas 8&4 said:Infection_Ag11 said:Texas 8&4 said:
The lecturer in question wasn't tenured
The dean was
Point? If he handled the situation with the student respectfully and got rid of the lecturer, and did so transparently...no one would care
My guess is there is more to this story than what we know. I keep asking the same question, how does a student get a one on one meeting with the president of a university the size of A&M? Further, let us not forget the little bribery situation that took place. Yes he is a very upstanding individual.
Gator92 said:Infection_Ag11 said:Texas 8&4 said:
The lecturer in question wasn't tenured
The dean was
Yet, dean wasn't fired.
W said:
no Obama era generals
it's very simple
Quote:
Again, it's clear many of you have never dealt with the frustrations of a meaningful leadership hierarchy.

TAMUallen said:
Just now back from ban camp.
You have no idea how hard it has been to not be able to celebrate on TexAgs!
Jbob04 said:Texas 8&4 said:Jbob04 said:
So premium is upset because welsh was a NIL guy and was going to take us to the promise land?
This is a joke right?
I guess they think this is going to set us back in our quest for winning a championship
Infection_Ag11 said:Gator92 said:Infection_Ag11 said:Texas 8&4 said:
The lecturer in question wasn't tenured
The dean was
Yet, dean wasn't fired.
University presidents can't fire tenured department deans
The world just isn't as simple as you want it to be
agent-maroon said:Quote:
Again, it's clear many of you have never dealt with the frustrations of a meaningful leadership hierarchy.
Or maybe we have and simply disagree with your assertions.
Ellis Wyatt said:
I'm guessing the dean will be looking for a job in short order, no matter how hard you think that is.
Infection_Ag11 said:agent-maroon said:Quote:
Again, it's clear many of you have never dealt with the frustrations of a meaningful leadership hierarchy.
Or maybe we have and simply disagree with your assertions.
Which would be fine, but many of the responses I'm getting is "well he should have just done this thing he has little to no power to actually do".
Again, you don't get to run Texas A&M like your household. That's just not how any of this works. I'm not defending this reality but it is reality, and we need to all live in reality.
Texas 8&4 said:
You are correct, all of us poor non doctor types have never worked for any decent size corporation. It's this type of condescending **** you do that rubs people the wrong way. Smartest guy in the room...
Get off your high horse and look in the mirror. Plenty of us have executive experience. We just disagree with your take.Infection_Ag11 said:Texas 8&4 said:Infection_Ag11 said:Texas 8&4 said:
The lecturer in question wasn't tenured
The dean was
Point? If he handled the situation with the student respectfully and got rid of the lecturer, and did so transparently...no one would care
My guess is there is more to this story than what we know. I keep asking the same question, how does a student get a one on one meeting with the president of a university the size of A&M? Further, let us not forget the little bribery situation that took place. Yes he is a very upstanding individual.
Our president can't fire a professor unilaterally if the dean of their department isn't on board. They have to take it to the board. You can thank Sharp for that.
Is that stupid? Yeah. But it's just the way it is.
Again, it's clear many of you have never dealt with the frustrations of a meaningful leadership hierarchy.
Texas 8&4 said:Infection_Ag11 said:agent-maroon said:Quote:
Again, it's clear many of you have never dealt with the frustrations of a meaningful leadership hierarchy.
Or maybe we have and simply disagree with your assertions.
Which would be fine, but many of the responses I'm getting is "well he should have just done this thing he has little to no power to actually do".
Again, you don't get to run Texas A&M like your household. That's just not how any of this works. I'm not defending this reality but it is reality, and we need to all live in reality.
Reality is he needed to go...and now he is gone
Infection_Ag11 said:Texas 8&4 said:Infection_Ag11 said:agent-maroon said:Quote:
Again, it's clear many of you have never dealt with the frustrations of a meaningful leadership hierarchy.
Or maybe we have and simply disagree with your assertions.
Which would be fine, but many of the responses I'm getting is "well he should have just done this thing he has little to no power to actually do".
Again, you don't get to run Texas A&M like your household. That's just not how any of this works. I'm not defending this reality but it is reality, and we need to all live in reality.
Reality is he needed to go...and now he is gone
And the next guy will probably be worse, because we have an horrible history of hiring presidents annd almost every university president is a far more entrenched career academic than Welsh.
Ag87H2O said:Get off your high horse and look in the mirror. Plenty of us have executive experience. We just disagree with your take.Infection_Ag11 said:Texas 8&4 said:Infection_Ag11 said:Texas 8&4 said:
The lecturer in question wasn't tenured
The dean was
Point? If he handled the situation with the student respectfully and got rid of the lecturer, and did so transparently...no one would care
My guess is there is more to this story than what we know. I keep asking the same question, how does a student get a one on one meeting with the president of a university the size of A&M? Further, let us not forget the little bribery situation that took place. Yes he is a very upstanding individual.
Our president can't fire a professor unilaterally if the dean of their department isn't on board. They have to take it to the board. You can thank Sharp for that.
Is that stupid? Yeah. But it's just the way it is.
Again, it's clear many of you have never dealt with the frustrations of a meaningful leadership hierarchy.
Regardless of the other facts surrounding the terminations, Welsh lied about it in a very public fashion. Period.
He broke the honor code and it was right for him to go. No need for all the drama. It's not the end of the world.
Texas 8&4 said:
Don't forget bribing the student
Infection_Ag11 said:Texas 8&4 said:Infection_Ag11 said:Texas 8&4 said:
The lecturer in question wasn't tenured
The dean was
Point? If he handled the situation with the student respectfully and got rid of the lecturer, and did so transparently...no one would care
My guess is there is more to this story than what we know. I keep asking the same question, how does a student get a one on one meeting with the president of a university the size of A&M? Further, let us not forget the little bribery situation that took place. Yes he is a very upstanding individual.
Our president can't fire a professor unilaterally if the dean of their department isn't on board. They have to take it to the board. You can thank Sharp for that.
Is that stupid? Yeah. But it's just the way it is.
Again, it's clear many of you have never dealt with the frustrations of a meaningful leadership hierarchy.
Infection_Ag11 said:Ag87H2O said:Infection_Ag11 said:Texas 8&4 said:Infection_Ag11 said:Texas 8&4 said:
The lecturer in question wasn't tenured
The dean was
Point? If he handled the situation with the student respectfully and got rid of the lecturer, and did so transparently...no one would care
My guess is there is more to this story than what we know. I keep asking the same question, how does a student get a one on one meeting with the president of a university the size of A&M? Further, let us not forget the little bribery situation that took place. Yes he is a very upstanding individual.
Our president can't fire a professor unilaterally if the dean of their department isn't on board. They have to take it to the board. You can thank Sharp for that.
Is that stupid? Yeah. But it's just the way it is.
Again, it's clear many of you have never dealt with the frustrations of a meaningful leadership hierarchy.
Get off your high horse and look in the mirror. Plenty of us have executive experience. We just disagree with your take.
Regardless of the other facts surrounding the terminations, Welsh lied about it in a very public fashion. Period.
He broke the honor code and it was right for him to go. No need for all the drama. It's not the end of the world.
He didn't lie, this board apparently just didn't understand the concept of past tense. Now did he end up looking bad aesthetically? Sure, because he was caught up in a political entrapment designed to do that by people seeking political clout.
Again, this was literally schemed up to crate this result. I'm not persuaded by the emotional claim that a plan to make administrators looked bad succeeded. ANYONE in his position would be in the same spot today. Anyone.
Texas 8&4 said:
We won't know the entire story....Again how does one student get an in person meeting with the university president...there is more