ShaggySLC said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

He has not been indicted yet. Why not?

Murder one is a little harder to prove, in my opinion. Manslaughter (hear me out) is more appropriate with additional charges over having the knife, also having the knife on school property. (Which still seems weird to me because of my age with every PU having a loaded gun rack in the rear view window was common) but my concern here is overcharging.

That is not a defense for Anthony on my part, it is looking at what we know thus far. Intent and premeditation hard to prove with we know now. Not a self defense claim, per se. It is not.

So, I'm just warning posters here not to flip out if the indictment is less than what they expect.

---

The charge will be murder. Intent can be formed in an instant. When you stab someone intentionally in the chest ... it is a murder. This was not recklessly done. Manslaughter is not the appropriate charge.

And this would be lightning fast for a murder indictment. I doubt they even have the full autopsy yet. There is zero rush. He is already on bond so the prosecution is not up against the 90 day clock for indictment to avoid a pr bond.

---

Hear me out here. Self defense is not really at play as a legal defense as much as it will be a jury play. Voir dire.

Now, that having been said, do I think Anthony has that caliber of defense attorneys? Don't know.

But for prosecutors stick to what you have nailed down. Not a jury expert by far but my belief is the simpler a prosecutor makes it for the jury to understand and follow, the better for your case.

It is all about the jury.

---

Jury selection is paramount in this case.

But how do they have manslaughter "nailed down" but not murder. How did he recklessly kill Metcalf? He did it intentionally and we know that because he asked about self defense. I'm sure there is an interview with the defendant where he says he was afraid and that is why he stabbed Metcalf. That is not reckless conduct.

His self defense claim will fail because his use of deadly force was not a proportion response.

This is murder. He will be charged with murder. I cannot even conceive of a reason why he would not charge murder. I was a Texas state felony prosecutor for years and am now a defense attorney.

---

I think everyone knows the answer to that but no one is really allowed say it out loud

---

Tom Fox said:

---

ShaggySLC said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

He has not been indicted yet. Why not?

Murder one is a little harder to prove, in my opinion. Manslaughter (hear me out) is more appropriate with additional charges over having the knife, also having the knife on school property. (Which still seems weird to me because of my age with every PU having a loaded gun rack in the rear view window was common) but my concern here is overcharging.

That is not a defense for Anthony on my part, it is looking at what we know thus far. Intent and premeditation hard to prove with we know now. Not a self defense claim, per se. It is not.

So, I'm just warning posters here not to flip out if the indictment is less than what they expect.

---

The charge will be murder. Intent can be formed in an instant. When you stab someone intentionally in the chest ... it is a murder. This was not recklessly done. Manslaughter is not the appropriate charge.

And this would be lightning fast for a murder indictment. I doubt they even have the full autopsy yet. There is zero rush. He is already on bond so the prosecution is not up against the 90 day clock for indictment to avoid a pr bond.

---

Hear me out here. Self defense is not really at play as a legal defense as much as it will be a jury play. Voir dire.

Now, that having been said, do I think Anthony has that caliber of defense attorneys? Don't know.

But for prosecutors stick to what you have nailed down. Not a jury expert by far but my belief is the simpler a prosecutor makes it for the jury to understand and follow, the better for your case.

It is all about the jury.

---

Jury selection is paramount in this case.

But how do they have manslaughter "nailed down" but not murder. How did he recklessly kill Metcalf? He did it intentionally and we know that because he asked about self defense. I'm sure there is an interview with the defendant where he says he was afraid and that is why he stabbed Metcalf. That is not reckless conduct.

His self defense claim will fail because his use of deadly force was not a proportion response.

This is murder. He will be charged with murder. I cannot even conceive of a reason why he would not charge murder. I was a Texas state felony prosecutor for years and am now a defense attorney.

---

I think everyone knows the answer to that but no one is really allowed say it out loud

---

I represent black clients for murder on the regular. They have zero issue charging them.

Hell, they should get me and my guys in as special prosecutors. We are all former felony state prosecutors. For $1.5 million, we will shut down the office for a few months and get this fool 30+ years on murder.

It will be an all white male (no white females) and hispanic petit jury.

This is an easy case for the state.

---

ShaggySLC said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

ShaggySLC said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

He has not been indicted yet. Why not?

Murder one is a little harder to prove, in my opinion. Manslaughter (hear me out) is more appropriate with additional charges over having the knife, also having the knife on school property. (Which still seems weird to me because of my age with every PU having a loaded gun rack in the rear view window was common) but my concern here is overcharging.

That is not a defense for Anthony on my part, it is looking at what we know thus far. Intent and premeditation hard to prove with we know now. Not a self defense claim, per se. It is not.

So, I'm just warning posters here not to flip out if the indictment is less than what they expect.

---

The charge will be murder. Intent can be formed in an instant. When you stab someone intentionally in the chest ... it is a murder. This was not recklessly done. Manslaughter is not the appropriate charge.

And this would be lightning fast for a murder indictment. I doubt they even have the full autopsy yet. There is zero rush. He is already on bond so the prosecution is not up against the 90 day clock for indictment to avoid a pr bond.

---

Hear me out here. Self defense is not really at play as a legal defense as much as it will be a jury play. Voir dire.

Now, that having been said, do I think Anthony has that caliber of defense attorneys? Don't know.

But for prosecutors stick to what you have nailed down. Not a jury expert by far but my belief is the simpler a prosecutor makes it for the jury to understand and follow, the better for your case.

It is all about the jury.

---

Jury selection is paramount in this case.

But how do they have manslaughter "nailed down" but not murder. How did he recklessly kill Metcalf? He did it intentionally and we know that because he asked about self defense. I'm sure there is an interview with the defendant where he says he was afraid and that is why he stabbed Metcalf. That is not reckless conduct.

His self defense claim will fail because his use of deadly force was not a proportion response.

This is murder. He will be charged with murder. I cannot even conceive of a reason why he would not charge murder. I was a Texas state felony prosecutor for years and am now a defense attorney.

---

I think everyone knows the answer to that but no one is really allowed say it out loud

---

I represent black clients for murder on the regular. They have zero issue charging them.

Hell, they should get me and my guys in as special prosecutors. We are all former felony state prosecutors. For $1.5 million, we will shut down the office for a few months and get this fool 30+ years on murder.

It will be an all white male (no white females) and hispanic petit jury.

This is an easy case for the state.

---

That's good to hear. How would you handle the gofundme, press conference, and now protest accusing calling for the brothers arrest in court? Honest question.

---

Tom Fox said:

---

ShaggySLC said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

ShaggySLC said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

He has not been indicted yet. Why not?

Murder one is a little harder to prove, in my opinion. Manslaughter (hear me out) is more appropriate with additional charges over having the knife, also having the knife on school property. (Which still seems weird to me because of my age with every PU having a loaded gun rack in the rear view window was common) but my concern here is overcharging.

That is not a defense for Anthony on my part, it is looking at what we know thus far. Intent and premeditation hard to prove with we know now. Not a self defense claim, per se. It is not.

So, I'm just warning posters here not to flip out if the indictment is less than what they expect.

---

The charge will be murder. Intent can be formed in an instant. When you stab someone intentionally in the chest ... it is a murder. This was not recklessly done. Manslaughter is not the appropriate charge.

And this would be lightning fast for a murder indictment. I doubt they even have the full autopsy yet. There is zero rush. He is already on bond so the prosecution is not up against the 90 day clock for indictment to avoid a pr bond.

---

Hear me out here. Self defense is not really at play as a legal defense as much as it will be a jury play. Voir dire.

Now, that having been said, do I think Anthony has that caliber of defense attorneys? Don't know.

But for prosecutors stick to what you have nailed down. Not a jury expert by far but my belief is the simpler a prosecutor makes it for the jury to understand and follow, the better for your case.

It is all about the jury.

---

Jury selection is paramount in this case.

But how do they have manslaughter "nailed down" but not murder. How did he recklessly kill Metcalf? He did it intentionally and we know that because he asked about self defense. I'm sure there is an interview with the defendant where he says he was afraid and that is why he stabbed Metcalf. That is not reckless conduct.

His self defense claim will fail because his use of deadly force was not a proportion response.

This is murder. He will be charged with murder. I cannot even conceive of a reason why he would not charge murder. I was a Texas state felony prosecutor for years and am now a defense attorney.

---

I think everyone knows the answer to that but no one is really allowed say it out loud

---

I represent black clients for murder on the regular. They have zero issue charging them.

Hell, they should get me and my guys in as special prosecutors. We are all former felony state prosecutors. For $1.5 million, we will shut down the office for a few months and get this fool 30+ years on murder.

It will be an all white male (no white females) and hispanic petit jury.

This is an easy case for the state.

---

That's good to hear. How would you handle the gofundme, press conference, and now protest accusing calling for the brothers arrest in court? Honest question.

---

Awesome punishment evidence.

When the other side is making a mistake, you let them. They would be making my job that much simplier.

---

ShaggySLC said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

ShaggySLC said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

ShaggySLC said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

He has not been indicted yet. Why not?

Murder one is a little harder to prove, in my opinion. Manslaughter (hear me out) is more appropriate with additional charges over having the knife, also having the knife on school property. (Which still seems weird to me because of my age with every PU having a loaded gun rack in the rear view window was common) but my concern here is overcharging.

That is not a defense for Anthony on my part, it is looking at what we know thus far. Intent and premeditation hard to prove with we know now. Not a self defense claim, per se. It is not.

So, I'm just warning posters here not to flip out if the indictment is less than what they expect.

---

The charge will be murder. Intent can be formed in an instant. When you stab someone intentionally in the chest ... it is a murder. This was not recklessly done. Manslaughter is not the appropriate charge.

And this would be lightning fast for a murder indictment. I doubt they even have the full autopsy yet. There is zero rush. He is already on bond so the prosecution is not up against the 90 day clock for indictment to avoid a pr bond.

---

Hear me out here. Self defense is not really at play as a legal defense as much as it will be a jury play. Voir dire.

Now, that having been said, do I think Anthony has that caliber of defense attorneys? Don't know.

But for prosecutors stick to what you have nailed down. Not a jury expert by far but my belief is the simpler a prosecutor makes it for the jury to understand and follow, the better for your case.

It is all about the jury.

---

Jury selection is paramount in this case.

But how do they have manslaughter "nailed down" but not murder. How did he recklessly kill Metcalf? He did it intentionally and we know that because he asked about self defense. I'm sure there is an interview with the defendant where he says he was afraid and that is why he stabbed Metcalf. That is not reckless conduct.

His self defense claim will fail because his use of deadly force was not a proportion response.

This is murder. He will be charged with murder. I cannot even conceive of a reason why he would not charge murder. I was a Texas state felony prosecutor for years and am now a defense attorney.

---

I think everyone knows the answer to that but no one is really allowed say it out loud

---

I represent black clients for murder on the regular. They have zero issue charging them.

Hell, they should get me and my guys in as special prosecutors. We are all former felony state prosecutors. For $1.5 million, we will shut down the office for a few months and get this fool 30+ years on murder.

It will be an all white male (no white females) and hispanic petit jury.

This is an easy case for the state.

---

That's good to hear. How would you handle the gofundme, press conference, and now protest accusing calling for the brothers arrest in court? Honest question.

---

Awesome punishment evidence.

When the other side is making a mistake, you let them. They would be making my job that much simplier.

---

No doubt, but in your experience, you don't see that carrying any weight at all, they're just making asses out of themselves and money begging?

---

DannyDuberstein said:

---

In Collin, decent chance of Indians.

---

Owlagdad said:

---

zb008 said:

---

Every white person should do themselves a favor and never live around blacks. They can rob you, destroy your property, and even kill you and not be held accountable for any of it.

---

So you are saying that despite climbing financial ladder, even higher than most whites, and live in upper middle class community like Frisco, and have good schools and not as much crime as Dallas, that black folks can't act right?

---

Owlagdad said:

---

zb008 said:

---

Every white person should do themselves a favor and never live around blacks. They can rob you, destroy your property, and even kill you and not be held accountable for any of it.

---

So you are saying that despite climbing financial ladder, even higher than most whites, and live in upper middle class community like Frisco, and have good schools and not as much crime as Dallas, that black folks can't act right?

---

Owlagdad said:

---

zb008 said:

---

Every white person should do themselves a favor and never live around blacks. They can rob you, destroy your property, and even kill you and not be held accountable for any of it.

---

So you are saying that despite climbing financial ladder, even higher than most whites, and live in upper middle class community like Frisco, and have good schools and not as much crime as Dallas, that black folks can't act right?

---

Tom Fox said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

He has not been indicted yet. Why not?

Murder one is a little harder to prove, in my opinion. Manslaughter (hear me out) is more appropriate with additional charges over having the knife, also having the knife on school property. (Which still seems weird to me because of my age with every PU having a loaded gun rack in the rear view window was common) but my concern here is overcharging.

That is not a defense for Anthony on my part, it is looking at what we know thus far. Intent and premeditation hard to prove with we know now. Not a self defense claim, per se. It is not.

So, I'm just warning posters here not to flip out if the indictment is less than what they expect.

---

The charge will be murder. Intent can be formed in an instant. When you stab someone intentionally in the chest ... it is a murder. This was not recklessly done. Manslaughter is not the appropriate charge.

And this would be lightning fast for a murder indictment. I doubt they even have the full autopsy yet. There is zero rush. He is already on bond so the prosecution is not up against the 90 day clock for indictment to avoid a pr bond.

---

normalhorn said:

---

DannyDuberstein said:

---

In Collin, decent chance of Indians.

---

Valid point. The Indian community on the north side of the metroplex absolutely HATES the AA community, in large part. Where did I come up with this conclusion? A business associate that lives in Frisco said those words verbatim last week when talking with me about this madness

---

Tom Fox said:

---

ShaggySLC said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

He has not been indicted yet. Why not?

Murder one is a little harder to prove, in my opinion. Manslaughter (hear me out) is more appropriate with additional charges over having the knife, also having the knife on school property. (Which still seems weird to me because of my age with every PU having a loaded gun rack in the rear view window was common) but my concern here is overcharging.

That is not a defense for Anthony on my part, it is looking at what we know thus far. Intent and premeditation hard to prove with we know now. Not a self defense claim, per se. It is not.

So, I'm just warning posters here not to flip out if the indictment is less than what they expect.

---

The charge will be murder. Intent can be formed in an instant. When you stab someone intentionally in the chest ... it is a murder. This was not recklessly done. Manslaughter is not the appropriate charge.

And this would be lightning fast for a murder indictment. I doubt they even have the full autopsy yet. There is zero rush. He is already on bond so the prosecution is not up against the 90 day clock for indictment to avoid a pr bond.

---

Hear me out here. Self defense is not really at play as a legal defense as much as it will be a jury play. Voir dire.

Now, that having been said, do I think Anthony has that caliber of defense attorneys? Don't know.

But for prosecutors stick to what you have nailed down. Not a jury expert by far but my belief is the simpler a prosecutor makes it for the jury to understand and follow, the better for your case.

It is all about the jury.

---

Jury selection is paramount in this case.

But how do they have manslaughter "nailed down" but not murder. How did he recklessly kill Metcalf? He did it intentionally and we know that because he asked about self defense. I'm sure there is an interview with the defendant where he says he was afraid and that is why he stabbed Metcalf. That is not reckless conduct.

His self defense claim will fail because his use of deadly force was not a proportion response.

This is murder. He will be charged with murder. I cannot even conceive of a reason why he would not charge murder. I was a Texas state felony prosecutor for years and am now a defense attorney.

---

I think everyone knows the answer to that but no one is really allowed say it out loud

---

I represent black clients for murder on the regular. They have zero issue charging them.

Hell, they should get me and my guys in as special prosecutors. We are all former felony state prosecutors. For $1.5 million, we will shut down the office for a few months and get this fool 30+ years on murder.

It will be an all white male (no white females) and hispanic petit jury.

This is an easy case for the state.

---

Ag with kids said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

ShaggySLC said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

He has not been indicted yet. Why not?

Murder one is a little harder to prove, in my opinion. Manslaughter (hear me out) is more appropriate with additional charges over having the knife, also having the knife on school property. (Which still seems weird to me because of my age with every PU having a loaded gun rack in the rear view window was common) but my concern here is overcharging.

That is not a defense for Anthony on my part, it is looking at what we know thus far. Intent and premeditation hard to prove with we know now. Not a self defense claim, per se. It is not.

So, I'm just warning posters here not to flip out if the indictment is less than what they expect.

---

The charge will be murder. Intent can be formed in an instant. When you stab someone intentionally in the chest ... it is a murder. This was not recklessly done. Manslaughter is not the appropriate charge.

And this would be lightning fast for a murder indictment. I doubt they even have the full autopsy yet. There is zero rush. He is already on bond so the prosecution is not up against the 90 day clock for indictment to avoid a pr bond.

---

Hear me out here. Self defense is not really at play as a legal defense as much as it will be a jury play. Voir dire.

Now, that having been said, do I think Anthony has that caliber of defense attorneys? Don't know.

But for prosecutors stick to what you have nailed down. Not a jury expert by far but my belief is the simpler a prosecutor makes it for the jury to understand and follow, the better for your case.

It is all about the jury.

---

Jury selection is paramount in this case.

But how do they have manslaughter "nailed down" but not murder. How did he recklessly kill Metcalf? He did it intentionally and we know that because he asked about self defense. I'm sure there is an interview with the defendant where he says he was afraid and that is why he stabbed Metcalf. That is not reckless conduct.

His self defense claim will fail because his use of deadly force was not a proportion response.

This is murder. He will be charged with murder. I cannot even conceive of a reason why he would not charge murder. I was a Texas state felony prosecutor for years and am now a defense attorney.

---

I think everyone knows the answer to that but no one is really allowed say it out loud

---

I represent black clients for murder on the regular. They have zero issue charging them.

Hell, they should get me and my guys in as special prosecutors. We are all former felony state prosecutors. For $1.5 million, we will shut down the office for a few months and get this fool 30+ years on murder.

It will be an all white male (no white females) and hispanic petit jury.

This is an easy case for the state.

---

There are black people in west Texas????

---

Tom Fox said:

---

Ag with kids said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

ShaggySLC said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

He has not been indicted yet. Why not?

Murder one is a little harder to prove, in my opinion. Manslaughter (hear me out) is more appropriate with additional charges over having the knife, also having the knife on school property. (Which still seems weird to me because of my age with every PU having a loaded gun rack in the rear view window was common) but my concern here is overcharging.

That is not a defense for Anthony on my part, it is looking at what we know thus far. Intent and premeditation hard to prove with we know now. Not a self defense claim, per se. It is not.

So, I'm just warning posters here not to flip out if the indictment is less than what they expect.

---

The charge will be murder. Intent can be formed in an instant. When you stab someone intentionally in the chest ... it is a murder. This was not recklessly done. Manslaughter is not the appropriate charge.

And this would be lightning fast for a murder indictment. I doubt they even have the full autopsy yet. There is zero rush. He is already on bond so the prosecution is not up against the 90 day clock for indictment to avoid a pr bond.

---

Hear me out here. Self defense is not really at play as a legal defense as much as it will be a jury play. Voir dire.

Now, that having been said, do I think Anthony has that caliber of defense attorneys? Don't know.

But for prosecutors stick to what you have nailed down. Not a jury expert by far but my belief is the simpler a prosecutor makes it for the jury to understand and follow, the better for your case.

It is all about the jury.

---

Jury selection is paramount in this case.

But how do they have manslaughter "nailed down" but not murder. How did he recklessly kill Metcalf? He did it intentionally and we know that because he asked about self defense. I'm sure there is an interview with the defendant where he says he was afraid and that is why he stabbed Metcalf. That is not reckless conduct.

His self defense claim will fail because his use of deadly force was not a proportion response.

This is murder. He will be charged with murder. I cannot even conceive of a reason why he would not charge murder. I was a Texas state felony prosecutor for years and am now a defense attorney.

---

I think everyone knows the answer to that but no one is really allowed say it out loud

---

I represent black clients for murder on the regular. They have zero issue charging them.

Hell, they should get me and my guys in as special prosecutors. We are all former felony state prosecutors. For $1.5 million, we will shut down the office for a few months and get this fool 30+ years on murder.

It will be an all white male (no white females) and hispanic petit jury.

This is an easy case for the state.

---

There are black people in west Texas????

---

Not many but no surprise, they are over represented in the criminal justice system.

---

Bluto said:

---

Backyard Gator said:

---

Dominique Alexander, a felon who beat a baby to the point of brain injury and is acting as an advocate for Karmelo Anthony’s family, is angry that I exposed him for who he is: a grifting, racist pot-stirrer running a fraudulent organization.

He called me out by name during his… pic.twitter.com/zqAVfgTBLw

— Sarah Fields (@SarahisCensored) April 17, 2025

---

Has this been confirmed? Is Alexander a convicted felon and other things Sarah Fields claimed?anski

---

Birds of a feather. pic.twitter.com/mOFNRaP8bk

— Tactical Dandelions (@TacticalDLions) April 17, 2025

aggiehawg said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

He has not been indicted yet. Why not?

Murder one is a little harder to prove, in my opinion. Manslaughter (hear me out) is more appropriate with additional charges over having the knife, also having the knife on school property. (Which still seems weird to me because of my age with every PU having a loaded gun rack in the rear view window was common) but my concern here is overcharging.

That is not a defense for Anthony on my part, it is looking at what we know thus far. Intent and premeditation hard to prove with we know now. Not a self defense claim, per se. It is not.

So, I'm just warning posters here not to flip out if the indictment is less than what they expect.

---

The charge will be murder. Intent can be formed in an instant. When you stab someone intentionally in the chest ... it is a murder. This was not recklessly done. Manslaughter is not the appropriate charge.

And this would be lightning fast for a murder indictment. I doubt they even have the full autopsy yet. There is zero rush. He is already on bond so the prosecution is not up against the 90 day clock for indictment to avoid a pr bond.

---

Not so sure, yet. Waiting for indictment and how that reads. I fully respect you and your experience.

I'm just not there yet.

---

jja79 said:

---

If Anthony did in fact say touch me and find out…

---

A Net Full of Jello said:

---

Has anyone confirmed the death threats the Anthony family is claiming to have received? .

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Has there been an indictment yet and I just missed it? Or if not, why not?

---

Quote:

---

And this would be lightning fast for a murder indictment. I doubt they even have the full autopsy yet. There is zero rush. He is already on bond so the prosecution is not up against the 90 day clock for indictment to avoid a pr bond.

---