Muh Polls

370,085 Views | 3384 Replies | Last: 24 min ago by 2023NCAggies
agsalaska
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Barnyard96 said:

Trump was ahead in betting odds when I went to bed election night.


That's not at all true, at least not the day before the election It was very clear that Biden was well ahead and barring any major miss in the polling he was going to win. I'm fact the polling slightly undercounted Trumps support and it was a little bit closer than expected.

Have no idea what the betting websites were doing. But anyone following the data knew Biden was almost certainly going to win.
Joes
How long do you want to ignore this user?
agsalaska said:

Barnyard96 said:

Trump was ahead in betting odds when I went to bed election night.


That's not at all true, at least not the day before the election It was very clear that Biden was well ahead and barring any major miss in the polling he was going to win. I'm fact the polling slightly undercounted Trumps support and it was a little bit closer than expected.

Have no idea what the betting websites were doing. But anyone following the data knew Biden was almost certainly going to win.
Yep. Anybody who wasn't delusional knew Trump was going to lose heading into that election. Biden led all the polls from about May to the end, peaking with a ten-point lead in the middle of that summer. This whole idea that it was a shock that he lost was made up afterwards.
SwigAg11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Joes said:

agsalaska said:

Barnyard96 said:

Trump was ahead in betting odds when I went to bed election night.


That's not at all true, at least not the day before the election It was very clear that Biden was well ahead and barring any major miss in the polling he was going to win. I'm fact the polling slightly undercounted Trumps support and it was a little bit closer than expected.

Have no idea what the betting websites were doing. But anyone following the data knew Biden was almost certainly going to win.
Yep. Anybody who wasn't delusional knew Trump was going to lose heading into that election. Biden led all the polls from about May to the end, peaking with a ten-point lead in the middle of that summer. This whole idea that it was a shock that he lost was made up afterwards.

I think the "delusion" was the known underreporting of Trump's support in 2016 and the difference between Trump's large rallies versus Biden's basement campaign.
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Do Trump supporters who are nearly cocky of victory at this point realize the election will come down to Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania?

even if Trump is able to actually do better than 2020 and win Arizona and Georgia.

he still needs to win of the Michigan/Wisconsin/Pennsylvania.

how have those state elections been going for Republicans the last 8 years?
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LMCane said:


he still needs to win of the Michigan/Wisconsin/Pennsylvania.

how have those state elections been going for Republicans the last 8 years?



Well, here's how the "most secure election ever" went in Michigan last time:



will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Country seems to be trending right... At least for the states that report.

will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
2023NCAggies
How long do you want to ignore this user?

[Any more disrespectful posts like this and you'll earn a ban. You can make your point without it -- Staff]
Mr President Elect
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
agsalaska said:

Rockdoc said:

One of the things most troubling to me is that the FBI desperately wants Trump to lose. They are scared to death of him and we all know what they're capable of. In my opinion they're gonna pull something before long.


Yea man that's pretty far fetched. Makes about as much sense as the 'muh fraud' people.

Stop reading that stuff man. It's a bunch of nonsense.
I mean, they did go to all the social media companies right before the laptop came out last election and warned them of some kind of misinformation that was about to drop. Then looked the other way when the CIA signed off on allowing a bunch of retired agents to claim it was Russian msinfo, all while knowing it was legit. It doesn't have to be something major, but they have already shown they don't mind running interference.
Mr President Elect
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
agsalaska said:

To be clear, these are two of the worst candidates of all time.
I feel like this is something spewed by the left and the "Romney Republicans", but Trump is nowhere near the worst republican candidate of all time. Yeah, he has baggage, mainly that he is so hated so much by the left and a sect of the right.
2023NCAggies
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:




He has probably spent more than that. And it's not improving his numbers much at all

Plus all the gaslighting. Media cover. Huge ground game. Twice the money.

RNC needs to get their ground game implemented asap. Spend more money on that than tv.

Trump and RNC have raised over 400 million in 3 weeks. I fully expect that number to be over 600 million by end of June. His sentencing date is July 11th. I fully expect Trump and RNC to quickly have another huge cash influx

Number could top a billion by end of August.

Hope they're using over half of it on ground game, get out to vote effort, ballot harvesting etc

oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Should be worrisome that, without campaigning and with zero enthusiasm and no show "rallies", Biden won so many fewer counties than Obama or Hillary or any winner ever did yet still shattered vote records. Certain captured / controlled major cities in key states can just keep finding and counting mailed in ballots that can't be audited or traced to voters until desired results are achieved.

Regime justices can throw out challenges on standing. Regime media can say it was the most secure election ever without basis and the low iq useful idiots brainwashed into supporting the regime simply believe it without question because their team "won".

Our country cannot last much longer with this system we have here.

No one should believe these polls.

Lastly, no matter what polls say, the trick up the regime's sleeve is a candidate swap. Once they pay off the Biden family for Joe to step aside to the nursing home, they'll have carte blanche to cheat as much as needed again because they already know they can and the new excuse is enthusiasm without evidence for the new candidate.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
2023NCAggies said:

will25u said:




He has probably spent more than that. And it's not improving his numbers much at all

Plus all the gaslighting. Media cover. Huge ground game. Twice the money.

RNC needs to get their ground game implemented asap. Spend more money on that than tv.

Trump and RNC have raised over 400 million in 3 weeks. I fully expect that number to be over 600 million by end of June. His sentencing date is July 11th. I fully expect Trump and RNC to quickly have another huge cash influx

Number could top a billion by end of August.

Hope they're using over half of it on ground game, get out to vote effort, ballot harvesting etc


Nobody watches traditional TV anymore. It's all streaming.
I think that, to be very honest with you, I do believe that we should have rightly believed, but we certainly believe that certain issues are just settled.

- Kamala Harris

Vote for Trump.
He took a bullet for America.

FJB24
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump leading with young voters? Seriously?
Breitbart:
Quote:

Trump is within two points of Biden among young voters between the ages 18-29, a recent New York Times/Siena Poll found. The vote has not been that close since George W. Bush defeated global warming activist Al Gore in 2000.

Another poll, conducted by Quinnipiac, found Trump leading with registered voters between 18-34 by one point. In 2016, two-time failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton won that demographic by 19 percentage points. President Joe Biden won the demographic in 2020 by 24 percentage points, according to CNN exit polling.

Trump's inroads with young voters appear to turn on a couple of factors:
[ol]
  • Biden's economy crushed young voters with high housing costs and overall price spikes by about 20 percent just as they graduated college, intended to buy their first home, or wanted to start a family.
  • Trump is an advocate of cryptocurrency, an area to which the Biden administration has been hostile. Trump boosted NFTs, promised to end regulatory hostility, and endorsed U.S.-mined Bitcoin.
  • Healthcare, Biden's number one issue, is of less concern for young voters than the oldest voting bloc, which appears more sympathetic to his political pitches than younger voters. In eight sets of data encompassing the nexus of "cross-pressures," Trump's immigration policy sabotages and undermines the attraction of Biden's most popular issue and thus essentially diminishes Biden's political appeal, according to Ruy Teixera, a nonresident senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.
  • [/ol]
    ts5641
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    FJB24 said:

    Trump leading with young voters? Seriously?
    Breitbart:
    Quote:

    Trump is within two points of Biden among young voters between the ages 18-29, a recent New York Times/Siena Poll found. The vote has not been that close since George W. Bush defeated global warming activist Al Gore in 2000.

    Another poll, conducted by Quinnipiac, found Trump leading with registered voters between 18-34 by one point. In 2016, two-time failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton won that demographic by 19 percentage points. President Joe Biden won the demographic in 2020 by 24 percentage points, according to CNN exit polling.

    Trump's inroads with young voters appear to turn on a couple of factors:
    [ol]
  • Biden's economy crushed young voters with high housing costs and overall price spikes by about 20 percent just as they graduated college, intended to buy their first home, or wanted to start a family.
  • Trump is an advocate of cryptocurrency, an area to which the Biden administration has been hostile. Trump boosted NFTs, promised to end regulatory hostility, and endorsed U.S.-mined Bitcoin.
  • Healthcare, Biden's number one issue, is of less concern for young voters than the oldest voting bloc, which appears more sympathetic to his political pitches than younger voters. In eight sets of data encompassing the nexus of "cross-pressures," Trump's immigration policy sabotages and undermines the attraction of Biden's most popular issue and thus essentially diminishes Biden's political appeal, according to Ruy Teixera, a nonresident senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.
  • [/ol]

    The numbers in poll after poll have been stunning. Still feel like we're being set up for something.
    FireAg
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    oh no said:

    the trick up the regime's sleeve is a candidate swap. .
    This is the one thing that I think can still beat Trump...a candidate swap...

    But those thinking it will be Newsom are dead wrong...the shine is off that turd...

    Although she continues to say she's not interested, I still think Michelle O would be hard to beat...and I think Hakeem Jefferies could also be in the mix... Could they make a deal to have Dr. Jill replace her invalid spouse? That wouldn't shock me either...she'd get the sympathy vote and be very hard for Trump to attack...
    agsalaska
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    ts5641 said:

    FJB24 said:

    Trump leading with young voters? Seriously?
    Breitbart:
    Quote:

    Trump is within two points of Biden among young voters between the ages 18-29, a recent New York Times/Siena Poll found. The vote has not been that close since George W. Bush defeated global warming activist Al Gore in 2000.

    Another poll, conducted by Quinnipiac, found Trump leading with registered voters between 18-34 by one point. In 2016, two-time failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton won that demographic by 19 percentage points. President Joe Biden won the demographic in 2020 by 24 percentage points, according to CNN exit polling.

    Trump's inroads with young voters appear to turn on a couple of factors:
    [ol]
  • Biden's economy crushed young voters with high housing costs and overall price spikes by about 20 percent just as they graduated college, intended to buy their first home, or wanted to start a family.
  • Trump is an advocate of cryptocurrency, an area to which the Biden administration has been hostile. Trump boosted NFTs, promised to end regulatory hostility, and endorsed U.S.-mined Bitcoin.
  • Healthcare, Biden's number one issue, is of less concern for young voters than the oldest voting bloc, which appears more sympathetic to his political pitches than younger voters. In eight sets of data encompassing the nexus of "cross-pressures," Trump's immigration policy sabotages and undermines the attraction of Biden's most popular issue and thus essentially diminishes Biden's political appeal, according to Ruy Teixera, a nonresident senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.
  • [/ol]

    The numbers in poll after poll have been stunning. Still feel like we're being set up for something.
    Couple of thoughts on that.

    First the young vote flipping R or being halved is not new. It happened in 2000. We have just been conditioned to believe that every 21 year old is some palestinian supporting LBGQ... flag waiving beta boy socialist Dem and thats just not the case. Most are trying to make it on their own.

    That being said, inflation annoys me. It crushes them. It is so much harder to get ahead of your paycheck than it was even five years ago that someone, anyone, is going to pay politically for that. And Biden, being the idiot that he is, decided to actually name it after himself, Bidenomics(another one of the dumbest things I have ever seen)

    There have always been things that never made any sense yet they still happen over and over again. Jews voting for Dems would be the most obvious current example. But the young vote flipping makes more sense to me than anything else.

    e=mc2
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    ts5641 said:

    FJB24 said:

    Trump leading with young voters? Seriously?
    Breitbart:
    Quote:

    Trump is within two points of Biden among young voters between the ages 18-29, a recent New York Times/Siena Poll found. The vote has not been that close since George W. Bush defeated global warming activist Al Gore in 2000.

    Another poll, conducted by Quinnipiac, found Trump leading with registered voters between 18-34 by one point. In 2016, two-time failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton won that demographic by 19 percentage points. President Joe Biden won the demographic in 2020 by 24 percentage points, according to CNN exit polling.

    Trump's inroads with young voters appear to turn on a couple of factors:
    [ol]
  • Biden's economy crushed young voters with high housing costs and overall price spikes by about 20 percent just as they graduated college, intended to buy their first home, or wanted to start a family.
  • Trump is an advocate of cryptocurrency, an area to which the Biden administration has been hostile. Trump boosted NFTs, promised to end regulatory hostility, and endorsed U.S.-mined Bitcoin.
  • Healthcare, Biden's number one issue, is of less concern for young voters than the oldest voting bloc, which appears more sympathetic to his political pitches than younger voters. In eight sets of data encompassing the nexus of "cross-pressures," Trump's immigration policy sabotages and undermines the attraction of Biden's most popular issue and thus essentially diminishes Biden's political appeal, according to Ruy Teixera, a nonresident senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.
  • [/ol]

    The numbers in poll after poll have been stunning. Still feel like we're being set up for something.


    Democrats are the freak show party. Normal people aren't down with their sickness.
    notex
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG


    All time high is a good thing, right?
    Rockdoc
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    All I know is these polling companies are in the business to make money. I've learned my lesson about trusting any of them.
    LMCane
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    FAKE NEWS unless you went to bed at 2200 EST
    LMCane
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    You didn't even review the actual electoral college map you posted- did you?

    because IT SHOWS TRUMP LOSING THE ELECTION.

    click on the link you provided, and the actual state by state electoral college has Biden winning the election!
    dreyOO
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Any polling yet on the idiotic Karen's in the suburbs that couldn't stand Trump and helped **** our country the last four years?

    I'd bet that if Trump is flipping young voters, it's a very heavy split favoring the men vs women.

    We need the guys to start influencing their girlfriends or wives to think long term and practically. Not with emotions. Is that possible?
    Barnyard96
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    LMCane said:

    FAKE NEWS unless you went to bed at 2200 EST

    Plumbers in Atlanta on call.
    agsalaska
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    notex said:



    All time high is a good thing, right?


    To be clear that is a betting market, not a polling aggregator. Not saying it is more or less worth looking at. Just for clarity.
    BigRobSA
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    ts5641 said:

    The numbers in poll after poll have been stunning. Still feel like we're being set up for something.

    One of the many issues with polling, other than it being unscientific bull**** devoid of actual value, is that it's easy and convenient to poll someone. They don't have to do anything, just answer questions.

    As to actually voting, that takes at least a modicum of effort.
    FireAg
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    LMCane said:

    You didn't even review the actual electoral college map you posted- did you?

    because IT SHOWS TRUMP LOSING THE ELECTION.

    click on the link you provided, and the actual state by state electoral college has Biden winning the election!
    The most popular outcome on that site is GOP winning the EC by 65-104 EVs...

    https://polymarket.com/event/electoral-college-margin-of-victory-in-the-2024-presidential-election?tid=1718372250862

    Not sure what you are referring to...
    FireAg
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    The RCP EC map with toss ups has Trump up 219-202:

    https://www.realclearpolling.com/maps/president/2024/toss-up/electoral-college

    The RCP EC "no toss up" map has Trump Winning 312-226:

    https://www.realclearpolling.com/maps/president/2024/no-toss-up/electoral-college

    policywonk98
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    Another thing to note is that nobody is polling New Mexico yet. Or at least nobody is releasing polls for them. The last poll done in New Mexico was around Sept last year. Biden was also up in Nevada in Sept of last year. New Mexico has GOP candidates winning statewide offices not that long ago in New Mexico. Pete Domenicis very wealthy daughter is also running for the Senate in New Mexico on law, order, and immigration. The money she spends to try and win a state the size of NM as a GOP candidate might end up helping Trump there.

    New Mexico has the highest percentage of Latinos of any state in the country. If Trumps message is resonating with Latinos in Nevada it might resonate in New Mexico. If trump can produce turnout there and win NM and NV(long shots sure) and take back AZ and GA. He does not need PA, MI, or WI. That would be a game changer for the GOP and the Dems.

    The way these maps are shaping up on President and Senate side, the Dems are going to absolutely need all the extra money they have raised vs the GOP. It's a lot more expensive to be trying to turn markets your direction than to defend a positive position.

    Will be interesting to see how this develops as we get to Labor Day.
    texagbeliever
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    When looking at national polls: I find the region breakdown a critical stat. Here is that breakdown from Civiqs (funded by daily Kos) link to details

    Trump & Biden were tied at 45%.
    Here are the region breakdowns

    ________South____West___MidWest___NorthEast
    Trump: ___49%____46%____48%______33%
    Biden:____41%____44%____45%______54%

    Regions for those who don't know:
    NorthEast = PA, NJ & everything to the north east. So PA is the only swing state in that bunch.
    South: MD, DC and then everything south of KY, WV & OK.
    West: NM, WY, MT, & CO (and everything west).
    MidWest: Everything else.

    So Trump is ahead in every region but the NorthEast. When you consider California, Oregon & Washington and their relative population size the West being +2% Trump is very interesting for NV, NM & AZ.
    South: doesn't really tell much about the swing states like GA or perhaps VA. Too much deep red blood to dominate.
    MidWest: Harder to tell. IL will lean democrat but the eastern states are deep red. Ohio is probably not really a swing state anymore either.
    LMCane
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    policywonk98 said:

    Another thing to note is that nobody is polling New Mexico yet. Or at least nobody is releasing polls for them. The last poll done in New Mexico was around Sept last year. Biden was also up in Nevada in Sept of last year. New Mexico has GOP candidates winning statewide offices not that long ago in New Mexico. Pete Domenicis very wealthy daughter is also running for the Senate in New Mexico on law, order, and immigration. The money she spends to try and win a state the size of NM as a GOP candidate might end up helping Trump there.

    New Mexico has the highest percentage of Latinos of any state in the country. If Trumps message is resonating with Latinos in Nevada it might resonate in New Mexico. If trump can produce turnout there and win NM and NV(long shots sure) and take back AZ and GA. He does not need PA, MI, or WI. That would be a game changer for the GOP and the Dems.

    The way these maps are shaping up on President and Senate side, the Dems are going to absolutely need all the extra money they have raised vs the GOP. It's a lot more expensive to be trying to turn markets your direction than to defend a positive position.

    Will be interesting to see how this develops as we get to Labor Day.

    this may be why Burgum is the VP candidate as he has a ton of money to flood into the RNC

    I think Youngkin is also wealthy and major players in Wall Street would back him, and it would put Virginia into play for real.

    I would actually be excited if Youngkin is the pick

    but likely it will be boring as Pence - Tim Scott.
    GenericAggie
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    Tagging to follow
    2023NCAggies
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    LMCane said:

    policywonk98 said:

    Another thing to note is that nobody is polling New Mexico yet. Or at least nobody is releasing polls for them. The last poll done in New Mexico was around Sept last year. Biden was also up in Nevada in Sept of last year. New Mexico has GOP candidates winning statewide offices not that long ago in New Mexico. Pete Domenicis very wealthy daughter is also running for the Senate in New Mexico on law, order, and immigration. The money she spends to try and win a state the size of NM as a GOP candidate might end up helping Trump there.

    New Mexico has the highest percentage of Latinos of any state in the country. If Trumps message is resonating with Latinos in Nevada it might resonate in New Mexico. If trump can produce turnout there and win NM and NV(long shots sure) and take back AZ and GA. He does not need PA, MI, or WI. That would be a game changer for the GOP and the Dems.

    The way these maps are shaping up on President and Senate side, the Dems are going to absolutely need all the extra money they have raised vs the GOP. It's a lot more expensive to be trying to turn markets your direction than to defend a positive position.

    Will be interesting to see how this develops as we get to Labor Day.

    this may be why Burgum is the VP candidate as he has a ton of money to flood into the RNC

    I think Youngkin is also wealthy and major players in Wall Street would back him, and it would put Virginia into play for real.

    I would actually be excited if Youngkin is the pick

    but likely it will be boring as Pence - Tim Scott.


    Burgum is not who Trump needs. He needs someone with experience with policy and knows Washington. Cotton and Rubio both bring that. Both would be good picks. Vance is also another that's a finalist.

    I'd like Rubio the most of those four then cotton. Both younger. Vast experience. Can be trusted. Both fighters. Rubio would bring some youth and woman votes. Probably some Hispanics.

    Oh and Vance is not a safe senate seat, we need him in the senate. Want Younkin to stay governor of Virginia for awhile, try to pull a DeSantis
    FJB24
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    No to Vance. Rubio had his opportunity window close on becoming a conservative presidential candidate down the road already. Trump will do better, hopefully, than anyone on the Senate Foreign Affairs or Intelligence committee's, all of whom are controlled by the intelligence agencies.

    Lake within 1?

    ts5641
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    2023NCAggies said:

    LMCane said:

    policywonk98 said:

    Another thing to note is that nobody is polling New Mexico yet. Or at least nobody is releasing polls for them. The last poll done in New Mexico was around Sept last year. Biden was also up in Nevada in Sept of last year. New Mexico has GOP candidates winning statewide offices not that long ago in New Mexico. Pete Domenicis very wealthy daughter is also running for the Senate in New Mexico on law, order, and immigration. The money she spends to try and win a state the size of NM as a GOP candidate might end up helping Trump there.

    New Mexico has the highest percentage of Latinos of any state in the country. If Trumps message is resonating with Latinos in Nevada it might resonate in New Mexico. If trump can produce turnout there and win NM and NV(long shots sure) and take back AZ and GA. He does not need PA, MI, or WI. That would be a game changer for the GOP and the Dems.

    The way these maps are shaping up on President and Senate side, the Dems are going to absolutely need all the extra money they have raised vs the GOP. It's a lot more expensive to be trying to turn markets your direction than to defend a positive position.

    Will be interesting to see how this develops as we get to Labor Day.

    this may be why Burgum is the VP candidate as he has a ton of money to flood into the RNC

    I think Youngkin is also wealthy and major players in Wall Street would back him, and it would put Virginia into play for real.

    I would actually be excited if Youngkin is the pick

    but likely it will be boring as Pence - Tim Scott.


    Burgum is not who Trump needs. He needs someone with experience with policy and knows Washington. Cotton and Rubio both bring that. Both would be good picks. Vance is also another that's a finalist.

    I'd like Rubio the most of those four then cotton. Both younger. Vast experience. Can be trusted. Both fighters. Rubio would bring some youth and woman votes. Probably some Hispanics.

    Oh and Vance is not a safe senate seat, we need him in the senate. Want Younkin to stay governor of Virginia for awhile, try to pull a DeSantis
    Agree with all of this. Keep GOP senators in place, Virginia and ND governors are not needle-movers. Rubio? please.
    Go with Vivek.
     
    ×
    subscribe Verify your student status
    See Subscription Benefits
    Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.