Farmer @ Johnsongrass, TX said:
TAMU1990 said:
Farmer @ Johnsongrass, TX said:
92_Ag said:
Farmer @ Johnsongrass, TX said:
92_Ag said:
trouble said:
He told at least one of them that he'd make them the fall guy for any recruiting violations if it came out. I think that was Earley.
If A&M does re-hire him, expect those "violation investigations" to be demanded by tu shortly thereafter.
We've seen this script already.
Violation investigations demanded by tu? You think tu wants to out themselves? Maybe there's an angle here that I am missing, why are you thinking tu would demand investigations?
I expect if they had any intent on following through on the threat tying the "recruiting violations" around Earley's neck, they'd attempt to do so after he's head coach.
That action would implicate tu. Then tu has institutional violations as a result. I don't think CDC would take the threat that far because then that action is proving A&M employees working for tu and that's a whole different can of worms.
Show CDC the screenshots and tell him to **** off. We'll bury you.
Yep. If CDC threatens. Show him the shots. ... I like your style....very similar to mine!
I agree with you and we're on the same side, I'm just also considering that quote by George Bernard Shaw - "Never wrestle with pigs. You both get dirty and the pig likes it". While we want to the keep the circus in their town, I am not convinced they wouldn't just try to drag A&M into the big top even if it has potential to harm themselves.
This whole miscalculated set of antics is proof enough that they don't worry about ramifications much. Perhaps the beating they're taking from talking heads will change that? I'm not convinced is all.