spherical said:i'm not sure what you mean by overly concerned, but i didn't really follow the rest of your post either.T264 said:You seem overly concerned for and ready to defend these few player's "rights to call the all Sully supporters, donors, and Corps members racists". That is painting with a broad brush.spherical said:
ok the bad behavior is one thing but if the AD tries to tell players they can't protest, you're asking them to infringe on many of their basic rights... i'm assuming you don't really want your money to be used to infringe on someone's rights?
Although I definitely do not oppose protesting , Protesting is not always going to produce the desired response (loss of donor monies). But hey- its only a few that are inflicting harm on our University so its ok, especially if they are good athletes! Wrong
listen, anyone can do anything they want with their money. i was just surprised to see someone say that "protests must be disallowed" in order for them to donate so i was curious if they really meant they wanted the AD stop players from exercise their rights.
and just for the record: the "few" have zero power to hurt the university off the field. as many have pointed out, the folks with all the power are the doners so... who can cause the harm?
If what the athletes are saying are not in holding with the standards of the organization, then by all means they should be disavowed. If what the athletes are saying is the belief system espoused by the organization, then be prepared for the consequences.