Define "face value", in this context?Macarthur said:strbrst777 said:
Bottom lines: Since anyone could have written it, it's very unfair to in any way implicate A&M, any Aggie, any Aggie fan or any other person or university.
Well, this all depends on someone's def of 'fair', but are you implying that the default shouldn't be to take the situation at face value until proven otherwise?
Because? Statistically speaking, the lack of a cancelled stamp makes it likely that someone with access to their mailbox who wasn't a mailman put it in there.strbrst777 said:
2. It's wrong to in any way hint or infer that Mrs. Sumlin was the writer or that she had any knowledge of the the writer's identity.
Macarthur said:why?AGGies0311 said:
This letter is very damaging to our university. Any information on who wrote it would result in a coming together against hatred from the Aggie family and more of us would come together and show the world how un-Aggie this is... the longer we wait and the less we hear the more I believe it was created by his wife.
BoerneGator said:Define "face value", in this context?Macarthur said:strbrst777 said:
Bottom lines: Since anyone could have written it, it's very unfair to in any way implicate A&M, any Aggie, any Aggie fan or any other person or university.
Well, this all depends on someone's def of 'fair', but are you implying that the default shouldn't be to take the situation at face value until proven otherwise?
Btw, are you an Aggie? Something makes me doubt you are.
