You posted a preprint. I believe the final "peer reviewed" version was published in September.Zobel said:
This is the author of the same bad paper that's was posted on the other thread yesterday. Doshi, a co author on the paper is an antivaxxer of the "traditional" pre-vaccine stripe.
You actually responded to me about it here
https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3353507/replies/64026933
Stop being so believing of everything you see on twitter.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X22010283
That said, are you familiar with any of the studies that followed up vaccinations with ECG, MRI, or troponin testing? That seems a better methodology to detect subclinical myo/peri carditis than the studies you post which all admittedly underreport heart vaccine-related injuries.
I wonder what those studies indicate.
Cardiovascular effects were found in 29.24% of patients, ranging from tachycardia, palpitation, and myopericarditis.
In total, 763 students (17.1%) had at least one cardiac symptom after the second vaccine dose. Abnormal ECGs were obtained in 51 (1.0%) of the students.
From the previous passive observation of severe cases, it had been concluded that around 35 out of 1,000,000 vaccinated individuals would develop myocarditis. In our study, we found evidence of temporary mild damage to cardiac cells in 22 of the 777 participants 2.8% instead of the anticipated 0.0035%