Zobel said:
There have been some pretty heavy hitters writing papers and making statements that the bivalent vaccines aren't worth it, and that boosters for kids have diminishing returns for increased risks. I don't believe that there's a pariah issue. There's a pariah issue for junk science, and then those people cry censorship.
This is where it begins to get malicious. You put the stats out there yourself… 50 cases of myocarditis for every 1M doses, correct? Covid risks for serious illness and death are near 0 for those under 18 and even more so for those under 12. It's far less than influenza in this age groups. Plenty of rigorous data there.
So 50 chances in a million for a vaccine that is protecting them from a virtually 0 percent chance of becoming seriously ill or dying from Covid. That is 100% diminishing return with increased risk. No question. That's not my statement, it's simply fact. It's not junk science either.
And if you won't admit that there is censorship in regards to Covid data that goes against the liberal media and science narrative, you're simply lying. Period.
Class of '00
Gig 'em!