cone said:
I remember when saying we'd be over 100k in the calendar year got you called a doomer
goalposts got moved tremendously in 60 days
I remember when we weren't trying to overwhelm the hospitals.
cone said:
I remember when saying we'd be over 100k in the calendar year got you called a doomer
goalposts got moved tremendously in 60 days
RGLAG85 said:Here's the illogical problem with the whole"overshoot" narrative that is just one more thing these super genius experts seem to miss when they see these talking points and say, "hey, that makes sense" without any common sense examining. You won't over shoot 70% unless people actively seek vulnerable people to intentionally infect. Why you ask and they never do? We can rush to herd immunity but there are safety catches that start to automatically slow this thing down dramatically. Between 30-50%, the infection rate drops dramatically because host begin to lose receptors to spread to. You may overshoot 50% but at that point natural infection reduction starts to put a hard break on the spread. You want to say you can overshoot 50%, ok, but at that point the susceptible will be so spread out that it naturally begins to flame out. You'll then, short of actively seeking receptors, gradually get to the 70% that likely kills it. I can't keep you in shackles if I give you a logical prediction of how to reach herd immunity quickly because it would blow my desire of scaring the **** out of you. Now I'm not saying K2 has that narrative, he's just regurgitating. Hence the "stay calm, all is well" you didn't understand.dBoy99 said:
k2 is not a virus hugger. He's just a super hi-level intelligence guy who breaks down complex subjects like epidemiology, virology, statistics, genetics, and immunology (just to name a few) for us rubes on forum 16. He's a self-taught, super genius expert. He doesn't pick sides - he's above all that. He is an uninvolved 3rd party, just compiling knowledge and sharing it with us. He doesn't care if we all live or die or crash the economy - his purpose is to share information and try to enlighten us.
Think of him as an unbiased, without ulterior motives Dr. Tony Fauci.
Actual deaths from covid, or deaths from other things but had contracted covid, or deaths of people who could spell covid? Several different numbers.BoydCrowder13 said:RGLAG85 said:Here's the illogical problem with the whole"overshoot" narrative that is just one more thing these super genius experts seem to miss when they see these talking points and say, "hey, that makes sense" without any common sense examining. You won't over shoot 70% unless people actively seek vulnerable people to intentionally infect. Why you ask and they never do? We can rush to herd immunity but there are safety catches that start to automatically slow this thing down dramatically. Between 30-50%, the infection rate drops dramatically because host begin to lose receptors to spread to. You may overshoot 50% but at that point natural infection reduction starts to put a hard break on the spread. You want to say you can overshoot 50%, ok, but at that point the susceptible will be so spread out that it naturally begins to flame out. You'll then, short of actively seeking receptors, gradually get to the 70% that likely kills it. I can't keep you in shackles if I give you a logical prediction of how to reach herd immunity quickly because it would blow my desire of scaring the **** out of you. Now I'm not saying K2 has that narrative, he's just regurgitating. Hence the "stay calm, all is well" you didn't understand.dBoy99 said:
k2 is not a virus hugger. He's just a super hi-level intelligence guy who breaks down complex subjects like epidemiology, virology, statistics, genetics, and immunology (just to name a few) for us rubes on forum 16. He's a self-taught, super genius expert. He doesn't pick sides - he's above all that. He is an uninvolved 3rd party, just compiling knowledge and sharing it with us. He doesn't care if we all live or die or crash the economy - his purpose is to share information and try to enlighten us.
Think of him as an unbiased, without ulterior motives Dr. Tony Fauci.
Still wanting to stick with the 75,000 - 90,000 death projection? As we hit 72,000 today.
BoydCrowder13 said:RGLAG85 said:Here's the illogical problem with the whole"overshoot" narrative that is just one more thing these super genius experts seem to miss when they see these talking points and say, "hey, that makes sense" without any common sense examining. You won't over shoot 70% unless people actively seek vulnerable people to intentionally infect. Why you ask and they never do? We can rush to herd immunity but there are safety catches that start to automatically slow this thing down dramatically. Between 30-50%, the infection rate drops dramatically because host begin to lose receptors to spread to. You may overshoot 50% but at that point natural infection reduction starts to put a hard break on the spread. You want to say you can overshoot 50%, ok, but at that point the susceptible will be so spread out that it naturally begins to flame out. You'll then, short of actively seeking receptors, gradually get to the 70% that likely kills it. I can't keep you in shackles if I give you a logical prediction of how to reach herd immunity quickly because it would blow my desire of scaring the **** out of you. Now I'm not saying K2 has that narrative, he's just regurgitating. Hence the "stay calm, all is well" you didn't understand.dBoy99 said:
k2 is not a virus hugger. He's just a super hi-level intelligence guy who breaks down complex subjects like epidemiology, virology, statistics, genetics, and immunology (just to name a few) for us rubes on forum 16. He's a self-taught, super genius expert. He doesn't pick sides - he's above all that. He is an uninvolved 3rd party, just compiling knowledge and sharing it with us. He doesn't care if we all live or die or crash the economy - his purpose is to share information and try to enlighten us.
Think of him as an unbiased, without ulterior motives Dr. Tony Fauci.
Still wanting to stick with the 75,000 - 90,000 death projection? As we hit 72,000 today.
Now do heart disease and abortions! You don't bat an eye about either of those, which happen every year without fail, so don't act like you give a **** about this. We've already established you're a hoar!cone said:
so 640k in a year is what would get your attention? a 25% rise in annual deaths? leading cause of death in the nation, more than heart disease?
what a badass
RGLAG85 said:Now do heart disease and abortions! You don't bat an eye about either of those, which happen every year without fail, so don't act like you give a **** about this. We've already established you're a hoar!cone said:
so 640k in a year is what would get your attention? a 25% rise in annual deaths? leading cause of death in the nation, more than heart disease?
what a badass
RGLAG85 said:Now do heart disease and abortions! You don't bat an eye about either of those, which happen every year without fail, so don't act like you give a **** about this. We've already established you're a hoar!cone said:
so 640k in a year is what would get your attention? a 25% rise in annual deaths? leading cause of death in the nation, more than heart disease?
what a badass
Do you TexAgs bro? How do you feel about the 30,000,000 that have lost their jobs or the business that have already gone into foreclosure or bankruptcies? Yeah, you're the real badass!cone said:
a hoar? lolwut
We all are. It's just some of us aren't trying to negotiate a new price for a virus.BMX Bandit said:RGLAG85 said:Now do heart disease and abortions! You don't bat an eye about either of those, which happen every year without fail, so don't act like you give a **** about this. We've already established you're a hoar!cone said:
so 640k in a year is what would get your attention? a 25% rise in annual deaths? leading cause of death in the nation, more than heart disease?
what a badass
My word. That escalated quickly.
cone said:
oh everything sucks, you don't have to tell me
don't worry, I'm definitely more worried now about the coming depression
Charlie Kelley said:cone said:
oh everything sucks, you don't have to tell me
don't worry, I'm definitely more worried now about the coming depression
Oh now you are? Weren't you one of the main Karen's from a month ago?
Dude, I get the overshoot theory. But at 70% it's simply a stupid, illogical theory and I explained clearly why. It comes from all the studies you love to link that talk about it but you're now on to a new one but never stop to question the logic when these others have given you enough information to at least question this one. But you don't and never have. You just read it and say, hey, that sounds cool. I get it, you mocked me for expecting honesty and accuracy in these models, numbers and projections. Kinda like you still can't see your own contradiction of your .66% IFR.k2aggie07 said:
Forgive me, but the overshoot dynamic is exactly the result of what you're describing. The herd immunity number and the number of people left uninfected aren't the same. The difference is overshoot... all of the overshoot is the number of infections that happen after that inflection point. But that's all theory for an unmitigated outbreak, which we don't have, which isn't going to happen, so it doesn't matter.
The reason I brought up overshoot was because there's a thought that the area under the curve is the same regardless of how fast the outbreak happens. It's not. Herd immunity is fixed, but overshoot isn't.
Why move it?annie88 said:
Staff. Please Move this to covid forum
[CAN'T MERGE THREADS, ONLY LOCK, DELETE, OR MOVE FORUMS. -STAFF]
BMX Bandit said:RGLAG85 said:Now do heart disease and abortions! You don't bat an eye about either of those, which happen every year without fail, so don't act like you give a **** about this. We've already established you're a hoar!cone said:
so 640k in a year is what would get your attention? a 25% rise in annual deaths? leading cause of death in the nation, more than heart disease?
what a badass
My word. That escalated quickly.
swimmerbabe11 said:
aggie doc
Actual covid-19 death toll probably closer to 20,000 than 72,000....BoydCrowder13 said:
Still wanting to stick with the 75,000 - 90,000 death projection? As we hit 72,000 today.
dBoy99 said:Actual covid-19 death toll probably closer to 20,000 than 72,000....BoydCrowder13 said:
Still wanting to stick with the 75,000 - 90,000 death projection? As we hit 72,000 today.
Hospitals don't get jack from Uncle Sam when 92 year old mee-maw dies with pancreatic cancer. But if she happens to test positive for SARS-CoV-2? JACKPOT!!!!
TacosaurusRex said:
Is this the right place for this?
This is a discussion about covid-19, so like the experts, I am just making **** up. But even my wild ass guess of 20,000 is probably closer to being correct than the 72,000 covid-19 deaths listed by WHO, Johns Hopkins, worldmeters, etc, etc, etc.BoydCrowder13 said:dBoy99 said:Actual covid-19 death toll probably closer to 20,000 than 72,000....BoydCrowder13 said:
Still wanting to stick with the 75,000 - 90,000 death projection? As we hit 72,000 today.
Hospitals don't get jack from Uncle Sam when 92 year old mee-maw dies with pancreatic cancer. But if she happens to test positive for SARS-CoV-2? JACKPOT!!!!
Got an numbers behind that 20,000 figure? Or are we just making it up?
I don't believe the unemployment rate is 17%. The liberals will do anything to make Trump look bad. All my friends still have their jobs. Based on that anecdotal evidence, I think the unemployment rate is around 5%.