What Silky said.
Flip phones, not smart phones.
Flip phones, not smart phones.
Plus they didn't have spell check at the Gotham Times yet.Brian Earl Spilner said:It's weird to think that in The Dark Knight, smartphones weren't a thing yet.Duncan Idaho said:
There are iPhones. So I guess present day
It feels like such a modern / recent movie, but this one thing dates it for kids today.
He loses all credibility for saying the Court of Owls is from The Long Halloween. The CoO wasn't even created until 15 years after TLH was publishedTCTTS said:
Phenomenal breakdown of the trailer, with so much insight into the plot, from just a couple minutes of footage...
Looked rather like a rectangular device much like an iPhone, not some flip phone.Brian Earl Spilner said:
What Silky said.
Flip phones, not smart phones.
Funny how that can be both a compliment and a problem. That was my problem with Leto's Joker, it looked like what someone would have thought was edgy in 1998.Bruce Almighty said:
That trailer is just awesome. It looks like it could have been made in 1995. It has that very dark neo noir video that the 90s was obsessed with. Very Seven / Crow like.
Cinco Ranch Aggie said:Looked rather like a rectangular device much like an iPhone, not some flip phone.Brian Earl Spilner said:
What Silky said.
Flip phones, not smart phones.
Does not look like a flip phone. Not necessarily an iPhone, but not a damned flip phone.Brian Earl Spilner said:Cinco Ranch Aggie said:Looked rather like a rectangular device much like an iPhone, not some flip phone.Brian Earl Spilner said:
What Silky said.
Flip phones, not smart phones.
Cinco Ranch Aggie said:Does not look like a flip phone. Not necessarily an iPhone, but not a damned flip phone.Brian Earl Spilner said:Cinco Ranch Aggie said:Looked rather like a rectangular device much like an iPhone, not some flip phone.Brian Earl Spilner said:
What Silky said.
Flip phones, not smart phones.
Looks like an iPod Classic.Cinco Ranch Aggie said:Does not look like a flip phone. Not necessarily an iPhone, but not a damned flip phone.Brian Earl Spilner said:Cinco Ranch Aggie said:Looked rather like a rectangular device much like an iPhone, not some flip phone.Brian Earl Spilner said:
What Silky said.
Flip phones, not smart phones.
TCTTS said:
Batman Begins and The Dark Knight are damn near flawless. But, IMO, The Dark Knight Rises is the blemish that opens up the *possibility* that this iteration could potentially overtake the Nolan trilogy one day. Granted, I recently rewatched TDKR, and it's better on the fifth or so go around, as its flaws can be more easily forgiven all these years later, but it definitely tainted the sheen of Nolan's efforts a bit. I don't know that anything will ever top TDK, or Ledger's performance, but as a whole, the Reeves films at least have a shot at overcoming the Nolan films, if only because of TKDR.
worst death scene:Living Legend said:TCTTS said:
Batman Begins and The Dark Knight are damn near flawless. But, IMO, The Dark Knight Rises is the blemish that opens up the *possibility* that this iteration could potentially overtake the Nolan trilogy one day. Granted, I recently rewatched TDKR, and it's better on the fifth or so go around, as its flaws can be more easily forgiven all these years later, but it definitely tainted the sheen of Nolan's efforts a bit. I don't know that anything will ever top TDK, or Ledger's performance, but as a whole, the Reeves films at least have a shot at overcoming the Nolan films, if only because of TKDR.
Can you expand on your issues with DKR? I KNOW I'm in the minority, but that was my favorite of the Nolan trilogy.
I'm still mad about that portrayal of Talia.Flashdiaz said:worst death scene:Living Legend said:TCTTS said:
Batman Begins and The Dark Knight are damn near flawless. But, IMO, The Dark Knight Rises is the blemish that opens up the *possibility* that this iteration could potentially overtake the Nolan trilogy one day. Granted, I recently rewatched TDKR, and it's better on the fifth or so go around, as its flaws can be more easily forgiven all these years later, but it definitely tainted the sheen of Nolan's efforts a bit. I don't know that anything will ever top TDK, or Ledger's performance, but as a whole, the Reeves films at least have a shot at overcoming the Nolan films, if only because of TKDR.
Can you expand on your issues with DKR? I KNOW I'm in the minority, but that was my favorite of the Nolan trilogy.
TCTTS said:
TDKR was the rare blockbuster that *should* have been split into two parts. So many of the movie's issues could have been addressed with more time. Part one should have ended with Bane breaking Batman's back, blowing up the stadium, and locking down Gotham. Leave it on a dark cliffhanger,
Quote:
He loses all credibility for saying the Court of Owls is from The Long Halloween. The CoO wasn't even created until 15 years after TLH was published
Quote:
Paul Dano's version of the Riddler appears to draw more from the Zodiac Killer (R-T.X.)
Not a huge fan of Anne Hathaway but I think she's been the best portrayal of Catwoman.TCTTS said:
Basically, what hedge said. It felt like two movies stuffed into one.
I love Wayne-as-Howard-Hughes, and the whole thing with him having to get back in the game after such a long absence.
I love Anne Hathaway's Catwoman.
I love Tom Hardy's Bane.
I love a lot of the broad ideas, action sequences, and imagery.
But Wayne suddenly falling for Miranda Tate like he does, after inexplicably losing all his money in a plot contrivance that makes no sense, is all pretty bad and incredibly forced. Jospeh Gordon-Levitt's character guessing that Wayne is Batman because of a facial expression is dumb. Nearly every single police officer in Gotham being trapped underground for months was eye-rolling. And Bane's prison having cable still gives me a good chuckle. Then the last scene with Alfred seeing Bruce at the cafe is so telegraphed, and such a straight rip-off of Good Will Hunting, that I couldn't not see it coming from a mile away.
TDKR was the rare blockbuster that *should* have been split into two parts. So many of the movie's issues could have been addressed with more time. Part one should have ended with Bane breaking Batman's back, blowing up the stadium, and locking down Gotham. Leave it on a dark cliffhanger, and spend more time in the lead-up believably developing Bruce's and Miranda's relationship, ruining Wayne financially, etc. Then part two would be all about Wayne escaping Bane's prison, and then showing how, exactly, he got back into Gotham, etc. Apparently that entire plot line was written but never shot due to obvious time constraints. But making a big chunk of the second act of a part two about Wayne actually infiltrating Gotham again could have been awesome, and wouldn't have led to such a disjointed, weirdly paced movie as-is.
Flashdiaz said:worst death scene:Living Legend said:TCTTS said:
Batman Begins and The Dark Knight are damn near flawless. But, IMO, The Dark Knight Rises is the blemish that opens up the *possibility* that this iteration could potentially overtake the Nolan trilogy one day. Granted, I recently rewatched TDKR, and it's better on the fifth or so go around, as its flaws can be more easily forgiven all these years later, but it definitely tainted the sheen of Nolan's efforts a bit. I don't know that anything will ever top TDK, or Ledger's performance, but as a whole, the Reeves films at least have a shot at overcoming the Nolan films, if only because of TKDR.
Can you expand on your issues with DKR? I KNOW I'm in the minority, but that was my favorite of the Nolan trilogy.
TCTTS said:
https://slate.com/culture/2020/08/batman-fandome-trailer-riddler-riddle-liar-do-when-dead.html
First paragraph of the article.TCTTS said:
https://slate.com/culture/2020/08/batman-fandome-trailer-riddler-riddle-liar-do-when-dead.html
Quote:
On Saturday, Warner Bros. released a new trailer for The Batman, the upcoming action film from director Matt Reeves exploring the never-before-told story of an orphaned plutocrat who dresses up in a rubber suit and beats the **** out of street criminals.