Please tell me I'm not the only one that laughed when the kid bonked his head on the caution sign in the beginning of the trailer.
'It' Remake
59,674 Views |
443 Replies |
Last: 4 yr ago by Proposition Joe
A movie about a clown has to have some slapstick, no?NICU Dad said:
Please tell me I'm not the only one that laughed when the kid bonked his head on the caution sign in the beginning of the trailer.
And, yes, I did.
For what it's worth, King has been very positive about this version.
Because it will make him millions.Macarthur said:
For what it's worth, King has been very positive about this version.
dromo07 said:There is a "Good Pennywise"?Ol Jock 99 said:
Have to assume they are intentionally only showing "Bad Pennywise" in that.
And what's up with sound editing? Could hardly hear the dialog.
The entire world should be thankful for King writing this book so that we have all been formally warned about the evils of clowns. There are no good clowns, except dead clowns. It's also why it isn't illegal to kill clowns. Clowns are not afforded the same protection under the law as people, and you should never leave a child or an adult alone with one.
Max Power said:
The entire world should be thankful for King writing this book so that we have all been formally warned about the evils of clowns. There are no good clowns, except dead clowns. It's also why it isn't illegal to kill clowns. Clowns are not afforded the same protection under the law as people, and you should never leave a child or an adult alone with one.
I feel the same about ventriloquist dummies.
That trailer felt like an R rated Goonies.
Or is The Goonies a PG rated It?powerbelly51 said:
That trailer felt like an R rated Goonies.
Either way. I know nothing about IT, but watched the hell out of the Goonies as a kid.Ol Jock 99 said:Or is The Goonies as PG rated It?powerbelly51 said:
That trailer felt like an R rated Goonies.
zap said:Max Power said:
The entire world should be thankful for King writing this book so that we have all been formally warned about the evils of clowns. There are no good clowns, except dead clowns. It's also why it isn't illegal to kill clowns. Clowns are not afforded the same protection under the law as people, and you should never leave a child or an adult alone with one.
I feel the same about ventriloquist dummies.
Right there with you zap.
That's sort of the vibe in the book. Plus a preteen sex party...powerbelly51 said:
That trailer felt like an R rated Goonies.
powerbelly51 said:
That trailer felt like an R rated Goonies.
That pretty well describes the book, except a true full motion picture version of the book would be a hard NC-17 Goonies with the exception of one scene, otherwise it would be a dark web, Eastern European underground Goonies.
I hope the feminists demand their own version with a female clown. Aptly name it "She-It"
A lot of people concerned that it will be true to the book, etc... While I'd love that, I just want a good movie. One of the greatest King stories adapted to film strayed from the book significantly... but Jack Torrance still worked.
amercer said:
As long as they include the underage gangbang scene I'm sure it will be great....
free_mhayden said:
A lot of people concerned that it will be true to the book, etc... While I'd love that, I just want a good movie. One of the greatest King stories adapted to film strayed from the book significantly... but Jack Torrance still worked.
Some things just won't translate, and that's ok. Sort of like the ending to Watchmen.
Max Power said:
The entire world should be thankful for King writing this book so that we have all been formally warned about the evils of clowns. There are no good clowns, except dead clowns. It's also why it isn't illegal to kill clowns. Clowns are not afforded the same protection under the law as people, and you should never leave a child or an adult alone with one.
Did you ever see the CSI Miami episode about the wife that cheated on her husband with the clown hired for their kids birthday party? Great episode and another red flag on clowns.
I have an unhealthy fear of clowns and forced myself to watch the trailer because I LOVE scary movies and am desperate for a good one.
Only way I can describe my reaction after watching it ... "Nope."
Only way I can describe my reaction after watching it ... "Nope."
Don't you want to float away?MASAXET said:
I have an unhealthy fear of clowns and forced myself to watch the trailer because I LOVE scary movies and am desperate for a good one.
Only way I can describe my reaction after watching it ... "Nope."
Chipotlemonger said:Don't you want to float away?MASAXET said:
I have an unhealthy fear of clowns and forced myself to watch the trailer because I LOVE scary movies and am desperate for a good one.
Only way I can describe my reaction after watching it ... "Nope."
You're a bad person and you should feel bad
free_mhayden said:
A lot of people concerned that it will be true to the book, etc... While I'd love that, I just want a good movie. One of the greatest King stories adapted to film strayed from the book significantly... but Jack Torrance still worked.
The Patrick Hockstetter missing flyer is an entire chapter of the book that was not mentioned in the TV series. Also, the house on 29 Niebolt St scene looks like it will be more true to the book than just the mummy sighting from the TV series. Also noticed what could be a vision of the fire at "The Black Spot."
Definitely looks more true to form just from this teaser.
I guess I didn't enjoy that trailer. Too much Insidius, Conjuring, modern shock and awe horror movies. That looked like cheap scares and jump tricks.
I'll still watch it but wasn't too excited after that trailer
I'll still watch it but wasn't too excited after that trailer
I guess I like Insidious / Conjuring type films, though I would guess this film won't be quite like those two.
RadAg14 said:amercer said:
As long as they include the underage gangbang scene I'm sure it will be great....
I'm not sure it is even the weirdest sexual scenario in his books either... dude has a strange mind, no doubt.
The guy has more money than his grandkids will be able to spend. At this point, I bet he just wants good movies based on his works more than anything.The Debt said:Because it will make him millions.Macarthur said:
For what it's worth, King has been very positive about this version.
Me after the trailer...
True. I feel "Misery" was adapted pretty well. She seemed more cruel and heinous in the book though.free_mhayden said:
A lot of people concerned that it will be true to the book, etc... While I'd love that, I just want a good movie. One of the greatest King stories adapted to film strayed from the book significantly... but Jack Torrance still worked.
GiveEmHellBill said:The guy has more money than his grandkids will be able to spend. At this point, I bet he just wants good movies based on his works more than anything.The Debt said:Because it will make him millions.Macarthur said:
For what it's worth, King has been very positive about this version.
Your way of thinking is why you'll never be 8-digits successful.
Once the Stephen King universe starts, he will likely be a billionaire.The Debt said:GiveEmHellBill said:The guy has more money than his grandkids will be able to spend. At this point, I bet he just wants good movies based on his works more than anything.The Debt said:Because it will make him millions.Macarthur said:
For what it's worth, King has been very positive about this version.
Your way of thinking is why you'll never be 8-digits successful.
This is the first, of what will likely be many, remakes of his stories. Each with very large - even tent pole release - budgets!
You know Stephen King was watching Deadpool and thinking to himself "Stan Lee has surpassed me in wealth, and he's filming with strippers. Are you kidding me?"
I would be fine with the movie straying from the book in one particular instance. The endingfree_mhayden said:
A lot of people concerned that it will be true to the book, etc... While I'd love that, I just want a good movie. One of the greatest King stories adapted to film strayed from the book significantly... but Jack Torrance still worked.
That book was one of the biggest letdowns I have ever had in a novel. After all my friends were going on how great it was, I suffered through 70% psycho-babble, 25% story line and 5% gotta-wrap-this-book-up-cause-its-too-long crappy ending.
Please, movie writers, feel free to completely redo the ending.
Terrible endings are King's specialty.
Stan Lee doesn't own the Marvel Characters or the source material. King does.
King will go from a net worth of 300 - 400 million to George Lucas types of rich. He owns all the source material and therefore retains his publishing and royalty rights.
King will go from a net worth of 300 - 400 million to George Lucas types of rich. He owns all the source material and therefore retains his publishing and royalty rights.
Good Poster
Josh Pate: Texas A&M Will Be 'Top 10 CFB Program' Over Next 3 Years
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
162
Juicy
Josh Pate: Texas A&M Will Be 'Top 10 CFB Program' Over Next 3 Years
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
89
beerad12man
Josh Pate: Texas A&M Will Be 'Top 10 CFB Program' Over Next 3 Years
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
83
Dave Grohl
Lt. Governor Dan Patrick displaying state's most important university's flag
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
75
TommyBrady
Lt. Governor Dan Patrick displaying state's most important university's flag
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
57