Brian Earl Spilner said:
I feel like anyone 40+ just won't connect with it in the same way.
I'd say 50+. 40+ was born in the 70s and came of age in the 80s. Unless they go more 90s with the nostalgia stuff
Brian Earl Spilner said:
I feel like anyone 40+ just won't connect with it in the same way.
Do you mean 40 and younger? This seems to be aimed directly at the 40+ nerds (like me!)Brian Earl Spilner said:
I feel like anyone 40+ just won't connect with it in the same way.
TCTTS said:
Heck, I was born in 1980 and half the references I've seen in the trailers are going right over my head. This looks way more '90s than I was expecting. That, and it's feeling more and more directed at the gaming community, of which I haven't been a part of since junior high. In other words, the more I've seen of this movie, the more narrow it's audience has seemingly become. For instance, I have absolutely no idea what the big bald soldier character is from, the one that seems to be good friends with the two main characters. Granted, the story itself should be universally relatable, and it sounds like a great movie, I'm just saying that I'm surprised at how relatively specific some of the references seem to be.
You mean the made up character that like the other two main characters is completely made up and not a reference to something?Quote:
For instance, I have absolutely no idea what the big bald soldier character is from, the one that seems to be good friends with the two main characters.
It's clear at this point that the movie will be very different from the book. As someone who is a huge fan of the book, I'm ok with that. I trust Spielberg has taken the heart of the book and turned it into something that will work on the big screen for 140 minutes.TCTTS said:
I'm just saying that in terms of references, this doesn't look at all like what was being hyped from book readers, and I think the lack of recognition in that department is going to turn a lot of people away.
This is a good point. The exposition in the book is all narrowly related to the hunt. But the OASIS is branded as this huge, ever evolving universe. It gives Spielberg some leeway to expand his setting and still maintain the feel of the OASIS.MW03 said:
I think it was kind of smart to broaden the scope of the references a bit. The book is from the standpoint of Wade, who is an 80s-o-phile because the guy who started the Oasis is an 80s-o-phile. But if you think about the world at large, it's set in the future, so people would be hooked on all pop culture, not just the pop culture our protagonist is hooked on.
Cstrickland05 said:Brian Earl Spilner said:
I feel like anyone 40+ just won't connect with it in the same way.
I'd say 50+. 40+ was born in the 70s and came of age in the 80s. Unless they go more 90s with the nostalgia stuff
I am. Bought to tickets at the exact same time at two separate theaters in two different part of the city. If I'm running late because of work, I'll do the ArcLight in Hollywood close by, but if it looks like I can get away early, I'll be hitting the new-ish recliner theater at the Westfield Mall in Century City. Will return whichever ticket I don't use.Brian Earl Spilner said:
So who all is going tomorrow night?