quote:
Competition spurs progress, right? We slid into a strong athletic, weaker engineering conference like a bull into water in July. Our athletics are moving up, and I doubt the rest of the conference is going to let Dwight Look stay at the top forever.
This is silly. It's like suggesting our athletic department move to a weaker conference to bring up the level of competition of the other schools.
quote:You obviously shouldn't count A&M in the SEC total if we're considering which conference A&M is a better fit for. And the Big 10 has 3, not 2.
it seems Purdue is leading us at the moment, but the SEC and BIG 10 each have 2 of the top 10 in Agriculture.
Ag Schools in Top 10:
Big 10 - 3 (Purdue, Illinois, Nebraska)
ACC - 2 (NC State, VA Tech)
Big 12 -1 (Iowa State)
Ivy League - 1 (Cornell)
SEC -1 (Florida)
quote:1) We can't have a serious discussion about this if you're not willing to accept facts.
Texas is not urbanizing... the urbans are migrating this way and they'll starve when they pave it over.
2) It sounds like you're unable to be objective about the urbanization of Texas. Maybe it's a personal bias from having grown up in an area that's been negatively affected by it, but regardless, it's happening. Google it and accept it.
In summary, I'm still not sure how you could objectively conclude with facts that the college of engineering and ag are better fits in the SEC. If anything, the engineering program would benefit from being in the Pac 12 and the ag program in the Big 10.