dave94 said:
I've tried to not get pulled into this whole discussion because I have only minor knowledge of law having known lawyers who have worked for the DA and also some as independent defense attorneys.
But I have to ask what your connection to this case is. Do you know the defendant? Or just have experience in this realm?
You seem to have connections to either law enforcement or the county DA in some way.
So where is your perspective coming from? Because you haven't ever said, "the jury decided, and that's how it's supposed to work."
Quote:
"
Yep. Didn't think the DA would attack Amber's character since they refuse to do it in every other case. They did not disprove mistake of fact but it did not matter.
Talked to one of Guyger's attorneys today. To quote him, "the case was lost when they refused to change the venue "
I'm in the same boat.
Its now the juries fault that Gugyer was convicted of murder?
Its not the fault of the convicted murderer that walked into the wrong apartment and shot a man dead?
What does it say about our justice system when you have an obvious Gugyger defender seemingly wishing that the case should have been moved to a different county to have a whiter jury pool?
I called Bocephus out because (forget all the legal mumbo, jumbo)
COMMON SENSE would tell you that intruding into other persons home and killing them is a crime that deserves punishment.
This case was clearly NOT manslaughter because she admitted on the stand she intended to kill him.