The link. Look, I know! but even a broken clock is occasionally right, at least if it is analog.

https://www.aclu.org/news/privacy-technology/tracking-alpr-cameras/flock-ceo-goes-ballistic

DeFlock, a group led by Will Freeman, identifies and maps the location of Flock cameras. Turns out Garrett Langley, the CEO of Flock, is a bit upset :-). There have been a couple of incidents where Flock cameras have been vandalized, which Langley attributes to the location of these cameras being "public knowledge".

Langley is trying to make publicizing this information criminal. "Flock and its police partners were under a coordinated attack" to "normalize lawlessness." And the mapping of cameras is "terroristic."

Sounds like a true liberal - privacy for me, but not for thee. Terrorism? Please. :-)

Every so often karma aligns and someone gets a taste of their own medicine. Bitter for him, but so sweet for others. I love it.

Flock doesn't like being tracked?

I live in a pretty rural town in NW Colorado and we now have 3 of these things. Nothing happens here of significance, yet we now have 3 of these for some reason with no vote cast, no ballot measure, nothing. Some shady **** going on with our local leaders and a pretty well funded group in our county is going after them. Can't wait to see how it turns out.

On another note, in the last few months, our cameras have had to be replaced several times due to 'things' happening to them by the local vigilantes.

Destroy them all

Always funny how both sides of the political spectrum are okay with destruction of property, as long as that destruction aligns with their beliefs.

Don't like the cameras, get local and state lawmakers to ban or heavily restrict them.

Hugely opposed to these. A BMW went blasting down our very small residential street blowing all five stop signs at probably 70 mph. Miraculously not a kid in sight (nice neighborhood with kids everywhere). Even then - to catch that guy - I'm opposed to these cameras.

Rapier108 said:

---

Always funny how both sides of the political spectrum are okay with destruction of property, as long as that destruction aligns with their beliefs.

Don't like the cameras, get local and state lawmakers to ban or heavily restrict them.

---

I get what you're saying but some private company wrapping itself in the flag of "back the blue!" is weak. They're selling surveillance that would be illegal if the government did it. If it's your neighbor with a camera over the fence looking at your pool you can ask him to take it down; when he puts it up in the public square, you can't do that. But you are right that lawmakers need to deal with this ASAP.

Why can't you just start installing them at the entrance of neighborhoods where public officials live?

https://deflock.org/

We're flocked!

https://abc13.com/post/pasadena-police-officer-accused-misusing-flock-camera-councilmember-says/19501287/

Quote:

---

"So there are laws that protect public trust. And then the second allegation was the stalking and following of a female police officer. And the stalking or following of any officer is a felony. So, there are two felonies at once," Guerrero said.

---

Sounds like the officer was using flock cameras to track the movements of the women he was stalking.

javajaws said:

---

https://deflock.org/

We're flocked!

---

https://deflock.org/report

They dont even have most of the ones I was talking about. Guess I'll need to submit them

Much like the Biden administration outsourcing censorship and stifling of First Amendment rights via manipulation and influence over social media companies, nor should they be allowed to outsource clear 4th amendment violations.

I dont care if there were no evidence of officials abusing them. A surveillance state is not what the founding fathers would have wanted. Its unconstitutional and should be stopped.

Hopefully by the courts. Vigilantes? I wont do it, but I understand, too. I call them Patriots.

Rapier108 said:

---

Always funny how both sides of the political spectrum are okay with destruction of property, as long as that destruction aligns with their beliefs.

Don't like the cameras, get local and state lawmakers to ban or heavily restrict them.

---

I'm sorry, where did the public get to have a say in Flok cameras watching their every move? Did the local and state lawmakers provide a transparent process to let the public know about this?

#Flock #DeFlock #Surveillance #Privacy #Tech #AI pic.twitter.com/bsH2HmnkWf

— DeFlock (@therealDeFlock) July 16, 2026

Welcome aboard to all the new faces!

It is amazing to hit 50k!

We will keep you informed and help you connect with others in your area.

Make sure you sign up on https://t.co/cu4BkoBuH9 to find an event near you during the National Week of Action.

They are getting nervous!😁

— DeFlock (@therealDeFlock) July 16, 2026

what do you think all these "data centers" are for?

we are becoming a surveillance state. they will have profiles on your movement, spending habits, social group, your ideals...there will be no secrets.

the "nothing to hide folks" should consider what you would be willing to hide if our country became a mix of London demographics and the UK's laws against free speech. and add the chinese social credit score.

would you have something to hide in these circumstances?

This is one of the rare issues where I'd donate to the GoFundMe for anyone who gets arrested for taking these orwell devices down.

AmarilloBQ02 said:

---

Anyone can film you in a public space. It wouldn't be illegal for the government to directly own these cameras.

---

They'd be open records though and not concealed from the public.