Ag87H2O said:
All this AI generated diatribe proves is that the Democrats and their media allies did a good job of smearing Paxton in the public domain.
I watched a lot of the trial, and it was a joke. The House impeachment managers were thoroughly humiliated by Paxton's team. You can bet if there was one shred of real evidence, Paxton would have been found guilty on at least one of the multiple charges. The impeachment was a RINO led distraction/witch hunt/retribution that should never have been brought forward.
Everything in that AI-senerated burb is sourced and true. Not as many Texans agree that Paxton was innocent. Not even some of the senators who voted to acquit.
I watched all of the Paxton trial. I was impressed in particular with Mitch Little (Buzbee's #2). However, after watching it closely I came to the conclusion that:
1. Paxton was using the color of his office to punish Nate Paul's business competitors
2. Paxton was a philandering fool
3. He should have been impeached for #1, not 2. But 2 was bad politically, especially when running against so-called choir boys like Talarico.
I recall talking to a state senator after the defense rested, He was thinking he'd vote to impeach. Suddenly all of that changed by the next morning because Lt Gov Dan Patrick gave marching orders to his posse that night, powered by a $3 million campaign donation from Paxton's buddy Tim Dunn.
San Angelo LIVE!
https://sanangelolive.com/