***** OFFICIAL PURGING OF THE DEEP STATE *****

67,388 Views | 531 Replies | Last: 35 sec ago by Owlagdad
LMCane
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to textar4404 • 7:58a, 1/28/25
It is impossible to immediately fire GS Feds without creating a case against them.
Reply Quote
1
nortex97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:08a, 1/28/25
AG
Abolish the CFPB? Yes, please.

Quote:
The CFPB isn't just unaccountableit's practically untouchable. Because it receives its funding directly from the Federal Reserve rather than from Congress, it operates outside the normal checks and balances that keep most government entities in line. The agency isn't even required to comply with Office of Management and Budget guidelines. Even the agency's leadership structure was designed to concentrate power: Until the Supreme Court stepped in, it was headed by a single director with sweeping authority and little oversight.
What was the CFPB given all this power to do? In theory, it is to protect and empower consumers, promote fair and competitive markets, and stabilize the financial system. In practice, it has reduced access to credit cards for lower-income consumers and jacked up bank fees and mortgage costs. CFPB bureaucrats also love price controls and excessive regulations, and they despise financial arrangements that they view as unconventional.
At the heart of the CFPB's misguided decisions is its leaders' apparent belief that consumers are helpless, irrational beings incapable of making good financial decisions without bureaucratic intervention. Armed with this condescending mindset, the CFPB justifies heavy-handed regulations based on what George Mason University professor Todd Zywicki calls "trendy behavioral-economics theories to 'nudge' consumers toward decisions central planners favor." The CFPB dreams up consumer biases and creates rules to fix problems that often don't even exist. Instead of relying on empirical evidence of actual harm, the CFPB crafts policies based on theoretical assumptions.
Quote:
Take the bureau's mortgage regulations. Designed to protect borrowers, these rules ended up making it harder to qualify for loans if you are self-employed or have non-traditional sources of income, ultimately pushing these borrowers toward non-qualified mortgage loans and higher rates. Then there's the agency's crackdown on credit card fees. Paying less in fees may have sounded good, but it led to higher interest rates and fewer card options for lower-income consumers. And in the payday lending industry, the CFPB's meddling has pushed vulnerable consumers toward predatory alternatives.
The CFPB isn't just it's brokenit's often redundant. Existing agencies like the Federal Trade Commission and state regulators already police fraud and try to ensure transparency. What does the CFPB's heavy hand add?
Rather than pouring more resources into this bureaucratic black hole, especially one that duplicates the work of other agencies and programs, officials should cut their losses and abolish the CFPB. Let's return to a system based on clear disclosure requirements, competitive markets, and the enforcement of fraud laws. Consumers should be empowered, not infantilized.
The CFPB remains, other than the ATF, the singular most 'un-American' federal organization in our history, imho.
Reply Quote
14
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:25a, 1/28/25
Reply Quote
18
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:27a, 1/28/25
Reply Quote
14
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to fullback44 • 9:33a, 1/28/25
Quote:
This is very interesting that this topic is being looked into.. I think the Ukraine money is probably gone regardless of what happened to it. Also, why would they just now be looking into this? maybe because the prior administration didn't allow it?
Of course. Biden laundered money through Ukraine for over a decade. The democrats impeached Trump because of it. Damned right they wouldn't allow anyone looking around.

**** those traitors.Turn over every rock and put a lot of them in prison.
Reply Quote
27
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to nortex97 • 9:35a, 1/28/25
Quote:
Quote:

"Much of the humanitarian assistance goes to relief organizations. Purchases of military supplies for Ukraine go to the contractor," he said.
Cancian said it's "not impossible" that money could be illegally diverted. However, he knew of no reports substantiating anything illicit had happened, and he was skeptical of the Instagram post's claim. He said only a fraction of the U.S. aid has been spent so far, and that there are safeguards in place. "There's no evidence that this has, in fact, happened," he said.
This sounds remarkably similar to what the same lying *******s say about voter fraud and voter ID. He's lying.
Reply Quote
13
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 9:36a, 1/28/25
will25u said:
"Non-political."

There is no such thing in Washington, D.C. Hussein made sure of it.

**** right off.
Reply Quote
26
FTAG 2000
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to fullback44 • 9:37a, 1/28/25
AG
fullback44 said:
nortex97 said:
Excellent.


I've also read the above a few places but nothing credible yet. It would make sense to do so given the sum$ and people/entities involved but I am hopeful we win also learn about a purge (and charges) as a result of such an investigation. There's been a mountain of human trafficking in Ukraine as well (often using our funds).

And if any single individual deserves to have a mountain of rico/trafficking/criminal charges filed against him:
This is very interesting that this topic is being looked into.. I think the Ukraine money is probably gone regardless of what happened to it. Also, why would they just now be looking into this? maybe because the prior administration didn't allow it?


GOP brought a bill last admin to audit Ukraine depending. Dems voted against it.
Reply Quote
10
javajaws
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to textar4404 • 9:42a, 1/28/25
AG
textar4404 said:
will25u said:

Putting them on leave with "full pay and benefits". Oh my. That will show them. Free vacation.

Just terminate them with full loss of benefits and pension.

They correctly understand that getting them out as quick as possible where they can do no further harm is the best for now while the lawyers figure out how to get rid of them in the cleanest way.
Reply Quote
18
Logos Stick
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 9:46a, 1/28/25
will25u said:


I would be willing to eliminate them all and replace them, forgoing any prosecutions for as long as that process takes.
Reply Quote
5
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:51a, 1/28/25
Reply Quote
19
LMCane
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:25a, 1/28/25
MORE PLEASE!!

By the end of the week, some employees said wearily that they did not know how long they could hang on.

Many described conditions as reminiscent of the McCarthy era, and were despondent to see how quickly their office's leaders acquiesced.

At the Department of Labor, staff members watched a colleague who had been recently hired to a civil service position be escorted out because she was a former political appointee. One employee said her manager required her to scrub the website not only of the words "diversity, equity and inclusion," as the executive order required, but also of references to "underserved" and "marginalized communities." Afterward, she said, she went into a closet, called her mother and wept.

On Tuesday morning, Moriah Lee, an analyst at NASA, joined a virtual town hall to learn what all the orders would mean for her small team, which monitors and audits projects in the space program. The acting supervisors, people she had known personally for years, made it clear to everyone that they were not inclined to show flexibility, she said.

Gone was the weekly speaker series that had been organized under the diversity program, which had brought in deaf people, combat veterans and others to share their experiences. Gone was her ability to live in Nashville and go twice a month to an office two hours away in Huntsville, Ala.

After the meeting, she and her colleagues went back to their jobs. They were rattled, she said, but not afraid. "The people who are acting most in fear are the ones in authority," she said.

Politico Article Details Anger Of Federal Employees
Reply Quote
4
lobopride
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:35a, 1/28/25
The VA has looooong wait times. They'd be better served using all that money on doctors and nurses
Reply Quote
9
1 edit
Ags4DaWin
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:42a, 1/28/25
Reply Quote
5
jrdaustin
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ellis Wyatt • 11:45a, 1/28/25
AG
Ellis Wyatt said:
will25u said:
"Non-political."

There is no such thing in Washington, D.C. Hussein made sure of it.

**** right off.
From his rant:

"It's clear they pushed aside all the high-level non political civil servants who refused to do Donald Trump's bidding."

What an an abject moron. This is truly the swamp complaining that they're being terminated for being swampy.

Glorius.
Reply Quote
22
Prosperdick
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ellis Wyatt • 11:46a, 1/28/25
AG
Ellis Wyatt said:
will25u said:
"Non-political."

There is no such thing in Washington, D.C. Hussein made sure of it.

**** right off.
They're so "non-political" that they magically vote 95% Democrat. Such utter BS.
Reply Quote
16
nortex97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:47a, 1/28/25
AG
Trump also just gutted the NLRB.

Which is great.
Reply Quote
12
James Forsyth
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 12:21p, 1/28/25
will25u said:


send other agents to check on them at home. if not sick, fire them
Reply Quote
11
FTAG 2000
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 12:39p, 1/28/25
AG
will25u said:

Should be 60 docs and nurses hired with that money, not diversity advocates.
Reply Quote
12
Cepe
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to nortex97 • 2:42p, 1/28/25
AG
nortex97 said:
Abolish the CFPB? Yes, please.

Quote:
The CFPB isn't just unaccountableit's practically untouchable. Because it receives its funding directly from the Federal Reserve rather than from Congress, it operates outside the normal checks and balances that keep most government entities in line. The agency isn't even required to comply with Office of Management and Budget guidelines. Even the agency's leadership structure was designed to concentrate power: Until the Supreme Court stepped in, it was headed by a single director with sweeping authority and little oversight.
What was the CFPB given all this power to do? In theory, it is to protect and empower consumers, promote fair and competitive markets, and stabilize the financial system. In practice, it has reduced access to credit cards for lower-income consumers and jacked up bank fees and mortgage costs. CFPB bureaucrats also love price controls and excessive regulations, and they despise financial arrangements that they view as unconventional.
At the heart of the CFPB's misguided decisions is its leaders' apparent belief that consumers are helpless, irrational beings incapable of making good financial decisions without bureaucratic intervention. Armed with this condescending mindset, the CFPB justifies heavy-handed regulations based on what George Mason University professor Todd Zywicki calls "trendy behavioral-economics theories to 'nudge' consumers toward decisions central planners favor." The CFPB dreams up consumer biases and creates rules to fix problems that often don't even exist. Instead of relying on empirical evidence of actual harm, the CFPB crafts policies based on theoretical assumptions.
Quote:
Take the bureau's mortgage regulations. Designed to protect borrowers, these rules ended up making it harder to qualify for loans if you are self-employed or have non-traditional sources of income, ultimately pushing these borrowers toward non-qualified mortgage loans and higher rates. Then there's the agency's crackdown on credit card fees. Paying less in fees may have sounded good, but it led to higher interest rates and fewer card options for lower-income consumers. And in the payday lending industry, the CFPB's meddling has pushed vulnerable consumers toward predatory alternatives.
The CFPB isn't just it's brokenit's often redundant. Existing agencies like the Federal Trade Commission and state regulators already police fraud and try to ensure transparency. What does the CFPB's heavy hand add?
Rather than pouring more resources into this bureaucratic black hole, especially one that duplicates the work of other agencies and programs, officials should cut their losses and abolish the CFPB. Let's return to a system based on clear disclosure requirements, competitive markets, and the enforcement of fraud laws. Consumers should be empowered, not infantilized.
The CFPB remains, other than the ATF, the singular most 'un-American' federal organization in our history, imho.
Probably can add Elizabeth warren's organization that she uses to de-bank conservatives to that list as well.
Reply Quote
13
captkirk
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:05p, 1/28/25
AG
Reply Quote
10
nortex97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to captkirk • 3:11p, 1/28/25
AG
It's so ridiculous these folks think they are entitled to their jobs throughout Trump's term. Nakedly partisan and clearly the Biden handlers knew what they were doing with December 2024 appointments (which didn't have to be confirmed by the senate oh by the way.). These should be Schedule C employees only and subject to termination at the discretion of the president.

Imagine Lincoln being told he couldn't relieve McClellan because he was appointed to a fresh 5 year term in 1859 to lead the army of the Potomac or some such.

Ludicrous.
Reply Quote
17
the most cool guy
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to captkirk • 3:14p, 1/28/25
captkirk said:

Don't even appoint a replacement.
Reply Quote
17
1 edit
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to captkirk • 3:26p, 1/28/25
captkirk said:
They don't have a quorum?!

Anyway…
Reply Quote
17
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:45p, 1/28/25
Reply Quote
19
FTAG 2000
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to the most cool guy • 4:02p, 1/28/25
AG
the most cool guy said:
captkirk said:

Don't even appoint a replacement.
Not until Trump gets his pick through. Then he'll have a majority on the conservative side.
Reply Quote
3
Ulysses90
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to FTAG 2000 • 4:34p, 1/28/25
AG
FTAG 2000 said:
the most cool guy said:
captkirk said:

Don't even appoint a replacement.
Not until Trump gets his pick through. Then he'll have a majority on the conservative side.


Why bother to appoint a replacement when Elon has got some pretty good lawyers that have filed suit to argue that the NLRB is unconstitutional? Wait for that case to go to trial.
Reply Quote
6
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:51p, 1/28/25
Reply Quote
20
dreyOO
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:27p, 1/28/25
All these whiners reminder me of the twitter losers that complained about Elon.

You mean the chief executive gives an order but you object so it's HIS FAULT!?!?!

They are going to do poorly in the private sector
Reply Quote
10
rab79
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to dreyOO • 9:45p, 1/28/25
AG
dreyOO said:
All these whiners reminder me of the twitter losers that complained about Elon.

You mean the chief executive gives an order but you object so it's HIS FAULT!?!?!

They are going to do poorly in the private sector

Aren't there going to be massive opportunities in the ag worker sector? Learn to pick!
Reply Quote
11
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:03p, 1/28/25
Reply Quote
14
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:12p, 1/28/25

Reply Quote
8
1 edit
Secolobo
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 10:21p, 1/28/25
AG
This is what Benz talked about with Rogan. Will curdle your mind.
Reply Quote
5
nortex97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:11a, 1/29/25
AG
Reply Quote
20
Iowaggie
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:48a, 1/29/25
AG
Reply Quote
25
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.