***** OFFICIAL PURGING OF THE DEEP STATE *****

121,147 Views | 933 Replies | Last: 7 hrs ago by Ellis Wyatt
SPF250
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
O'Leary: "It's not the people. It's the codes. They are COBALT."
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Quote:

More good news from Trump's DOJ.

Blomberg confirms that associate deputy AG Bradley Weinsheimer, considered Lisa Monaco's right-hand man, has been removed from his post. A 30+-year veteran of the DOJ, Weinsheimer was given the option of moving to a new immigration enforcement office or resign/be fired.

Weinsheimer was involved in the Hunter Biden matter, running interference for the Bidens and going over the head of Special Counsel David Weiss.

According to a 2023 New York Post article, Weinsheimer was "a conduit for Hunter Biden's legal team in the final stretch of the tax fraud investigation" proving that main Justice--or at least Monaco and Weinsheimer--were really in charge, not Weiss.

After lawyers for IRS whistleblowers who later testified to the political nature of DOJ decision making in the Biden investigation, contacted Weinsheimer--the alleged "nonpartisan" DOJ official in charge of handling whistleblower complaints to ensure protection for those employees--Weinsheimer met with Weiss and Hunter Biden's attorney.

One day later, according to lawyers for the IRS whistleblowers, "Weinsheimer scheduled a meeting with Mr. Biden's defense counsel to appeal over the head of Mr. Weiss in a way that was totally at odds with the narrative that David Weiss was acting independently.

The Deputy Attorney General's office then claimed to us it was genuinely interested in addressing the whistleblower's allegations, without disclosing its meeting with Hunter Biden's lawyers. We now know that shortly after that meeting Weiss's assistant [Lesley Wolf] offered to end the case with no guilty plea at all on the very same day that DOJ removed our client and his entire IRS team from the case."

Weinsheimer also wrote a five-page letter to Congress restricting the testimony of Wolf, another DOJ official protecting the Bidens. On at least 79 occasions, Wolf cited Weinsheimer's letter as an excuse to refuse to answer Congress' questions as to her role on the investigation.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Must be nice.

Tailgate88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SPF250 said:

O'Leary: "It's not the people. It's the codes. They are COBALT."
COBALT, COBOL, whatever.

will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag In Ok
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Might as well be Sanskrit.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
"On Mondays and Fridays all of last year, EPA HQs only had 8.9% daily attendance."

Tells you straight out that the EPA is 91.1% overstaffed.
FireAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You know…it dawned on me this morning…for people to be on the SSA roles who would literally be older than this nation, or even older than the SSA itself, it would mean that someone had to go in there and create those fake numbers deliberately…

I'm hoping forensics can at least show when those 'ancient' individual accounts were created…
Eso si, Que es
How long do you want to ignore this user?
need to give them the benefit of the doubt, that is only 2/5 days of the week, so 91.1 X 40% = 37% overstaffed.

Start there with a 37% RIF and then do it again in 3 months.
JFABNRGR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Eso si, Que es said:

need to give them the benefit of the doubt, that is only 2/5 days of the week, so 91.1 X 40% = 37% overstaffed.

Start there with a 37% RIF and then do it again in 3 months.
No that might work for Private Industry but I am with O'Leary on this one. "double what you think you need to cut".
“You can resolve to live your life with integrity. Let your credo be this: Let the lie come into the world, let it even triumph. But not through me.”
- Alexander Solzhenitsyn
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump administration fires thousands for 'performance' without evidence, in messy rush


Many probationary employees targeted in latest Trump cuts across agencies had excellent ratings; legal challenges are expected.

February 17, 2025 at 7:18 p.m. EST Yesterday at 7:18 p.m. EST

Amanda Mae Downey hugs her daughters after being fired from her federal job at the Forest Service in Lake City, Michigan, on Monday. (Kristen Norman/For The Washington Post)

The first message from her manager on Saturday afternoon misspelled Amanda Mae Downey's name. The second mentioned "the news" about probationary federal workers and how the Trump administration planned to fire them.

When Downey called her boss at a Michigan branch of the U.S. Forest Service for an explanation, she learned her name was on a firing list. She would have to come into the office to sign a letter formalizing her termination. And she had to do it before the holiday weekend was over.

"I'm glad that our agency at least has decided we can do it in person," her manager said, according to a recording Downey provided to The Washington Post. "So we can add a little human touch to what's going on."
Many federal government employees were dismissed over the holiday weekend as managers confronted a Trump administration demand to fire workers by Tuesday. In group texts and in online forums, they dubbed the error-ridden run of firings the "St. Valentine's Day Massacre."

The firings targeted new hires on probation, who have fewer protections than permanent employees, and swept up people with years of service who had recently transferred between agencies, as well as military veterans and people with disabilities employed through a program that sped their hiring but put them on two years' probation. Most probationary employees have limited rights to appeal dismissals, but union heads have vowed to challenge the mass firings in court. The largest union representing federal workers has also indicated it plans to fight the terminations and pursue legal action.

A GOOD START!
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
HunterAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:


What does that tell you when these people refuse to transfer to another assignment?

They must not want their job that much

or they just aren't working very diligently in their present position and fear the work in the new position

or they want to stay in their present position because of the influence, contacts and under-the-table money / gifts.

It ain't rocket surgery people. LOL.
HunterAggie

The Elko Era has begun
yippee2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I wish RUSH was here to enjoy this purge.
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
After we do as many blanket firings as possible- it's time to hit the GS-15 and SES leadership hard


Department of Homeland Security preparing to fire hundreds of senior leaders this week
Published Tue, Feb 18 2025

The Trump administration is preparing to fire hundreds of high-level Department of Homeland Security employees this week as part of a move to rid the country's third-largest agency of people deemed to be misaligned with the administration's goals, according to three sources familiar with the matter.

The sources said the Trump administration has a "centralized plan" and a list of people in high-level positions across every component of DHS who are to be targeted this week.

The firings will come on top of hundreds of more general cuts that began across DHS on Friday night, which targeted the Federal Emergency Management Agency, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. Those firings were the latest in a governmentwide effort to reduce the federal workforce.

This week, the three sources told NBC News, career employees at high managerial levels, namely Senior Executive Service and General Schedule 15 employees, may be removed from agencies across DHS not to reduce the size of the workforce but to remove employees whom the administration sees as potentially standing in the way of goals the Trump administration has for the agency.

DHS, which includes Customs and Border Protection and Immigration and Customs Enforcement, is the primary agency tasked with enforcing U.S. immigration law. Trump has relied heavily on CBP to secure the southwest border and on ICE to ramp up arrests and deportations of undocumented immigrants living in the United States.

A Trump administration official defended the plan. Asked whether reducing the positions would make it harder for DHS to make good on Trump's immigration goals, the administration official said the administration is removing people who it believes "willfully grind things to a halt."

"These people put themselves in a terrible position, and they need to be removed," the Trump administration official said.

Now every agency must fire their SES leftists
American Hardwood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FireAg said:

You know…it dawned on me this morning…for people to be on the SSA roles who would literally be older than this nation, or even older than the SSA itself, it would mean that someone had to go in there and create those fake numbers deliberately…

I'm hoping forensics can at least show when those 'ancient' individual accounts were created…
Apparently, you haven't heard of the 'fat fingers theory'.
The best way to keep evil men from wielding great power is to not create great power in the first place.
MagnumLoad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
People getting paid with tax dollars should not have the right to unionize.
I hate tu. It's in my blood.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big_Time_Timmy_Jim said:

My guess is majority will be facilities who continued to collect checks assigned to them after a patients death, mixed in tons of family members still cashing mom and dads checks that magically never stopped showing up, and probably **** ton of illegals
Wondering if Actblue is involved? Could be all the deceased not only vote Democrat but donate to Democrats.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Big_Time_Timmy_Jim
How long do you want to ignore this user?
richardag said:

Big_Time_Timmy_Jim said:

My guess is majority will be facilities who continued to collect checks assigned to them after a patients death, mixed in tons of family members still cashing mom and dads checks that magically never stopped showing up, and probably **** ton of illegals
Wondering if Actblue is involved? Could be all the deceased not only vote Democrat but donate to Democrats.
There is some connection here to voter rolls, illegal voting, etc. Someone is behind the scam.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Big_Time_Timmy_Jim said:

richardag said:

Big_Time_Timmy_Jim said:

My guess is majority will be facilities who continued to collect checks assigned to them after a patients death, mixed in tons of family members still cashing mom and dads checks that magically never stopped showing up, and probably **** ton of illegals
Wondering if Actblue is involved? Could be all the deceased not only vote Democrat but donate to Democrats.
There is some connection here to voter rolls, illegal voting, etc. Someone is behind the scam.
You betcha.

ERIC was charging member states to go through their Bureau of Vital Statistics records, among other state records to "maintain" that state's voter rolls. Death certificates are maintained by those Bureaus.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big_Time_Timmy_Jim said:

richardag said:

Big_Time_Timmy_Jim said:

My guess is majority will be facilities who continued to collect checks assigned to them after a patients death, mixed in tons of family members still cashing mom and dads checks that magically never stopped showing up, and probably **** ton of illegals
Wondering if Actblue is involved? Could be all the deceased not only vote Democrat but donate to Democrats.
There is some connection here to voter rolls, illegal voting, etc. Someone is behind the scam.
Some people may have thought I was trying to be funny, but I was deadly serious.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:


Elon was right. Many have left voluntarily.
Trump will fix it.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LMCane said:

Trump administration fires thousands for 'performance' without evidence, in messy rush


Many probationary employees targeted in latest Trump cuts across agencies had excellent ratings; legal challenges are expected.

February 17, 2025 at 7:18 p.m. EST Yesterday at 7:18 p.m. EST

Amanda Mae Downey hugs her daughters after being fired from her federal job at the Forest Service in Lake City, Michigan, on Monday. (Kristen Norman/For The Washington Post)

The first message from her manager on Saturday afternoon misspelled Amanda Mae Downey's name. The second mentioned "the news" about probationary federal workers and how the Trump administration planned to fire them.

When Downey called her boss at a Michigan branch of the U.S. Forest Service for an explanation, she learned her name was on a firing list. She would have to come into the office to sign a letter formalizing her termination. And she had to do it before the holiday weekend was over.

"I'm glad that our agency at least has decided we can do it in person," her manager said, according to a recording Downey provided to The Washington Post. "So we can add a little human touch to what's going on."
Many federal government employees were dismissed over the holiday weekend as managers confronted a Trump administration demand to fire workers by Tuesday. In group texts and in online forums, they dubbed the error-ridden run of firings the "St. Valentine's Day Massacre."

The firings targeted new hires on probation, who have fewer protections than permanent employees, and swept up people with years of service who had recently transferred between agencies, as well as military veterans and people with disabilities employed through a program that sped their hiring but put them on two years' probation. Most probationary employees have limited rights to appeal dismissals, but union heads have vowed to challenge the mass firings in court. The largest union representing federal workers has also indicated it plans to fight the terminations and pursue legal action.

A GOOD START!
The lawsuits will likely be dismissed. Probationary employment has a long history of the employer being able to fire them easily.
Trump will fix it.
Ulysses90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nm
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If I'm not mistaken, Denise was not only heavily involved with prosecuting Jan 6th cases on 1512(c) grounds which were thrown out by SCOTUS last term but also helped to cover up the Hunter Biden laptop.

ETA: Think I overplayed her role in the Hunter lap top. Got her confused with someone else.
AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:


Really kinda ironic that Jim Jones was in charge of food safety.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:


His work in Koolaid safety left a lot to be desired.
Houston Lee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
txags92 said:

will25u said:


His work in Koolaid safety left a lot to be desired.
Brick walls were never safe when the Kool-aid mascot was around.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Houston Lee said:

txags92 said:

will25u said:


His work in Koolaid safety left a lot to be desired.
Brick walls were never safe when the Kool-aid mascot was around.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Well, this is convenient. Self identify.
Quote:

Moments ago, 900+ career DOJ lawyers signed an open letter in support of ongoing Lawfare operations against President Trump and the American judicial system.


The rest, with the names is HERE

Quote:

Put another way, 900 career DOJ lawyers, who used Main Justice as their platform to participate in corrupting and weaponizing the American judicial system for their own financial benefit, have now publicly self-identified.

These are the legal abusers within the system. The professional gaslighters, Lawfare activists and legally trained abusers of trust, who twist, distort and tear at the foundational fabric of our constitutional republic, while claiming moral superiority and cloaking their efforts under the guise of victimhood.
LINK
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.