***** OFFICIAL PURGING OF THE DEEP STATE *****

568,982 Views | 2707 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by Tailgate88
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
WTAF does Damon Wilson do for Americans that is worth twice as much as what Marco Rubio does?


(From his X profile). He sat down with the Bush School chat folks recently, if interested.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Reps Ellzey, Carter, Calvert, and Pfluger are the Texas GOP Reps who are absolute traitors.

Edit: and Moran, and McCaul.
fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's easily a $2,000 to $3,000 suit he has on.
Hate is how progressives sustain themselves. Without hate, introspection begins to slip into the progressive's consciousness, threatening the progressive with the truth: that their ideas and opinions are illogical, hypocritical, dangerous, and asinine.
This is backed by data.
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Breaking:

Appellate Court rules the Palestinian Hamas terrorist Mahmoud Khalil

should be deported and that the lower court has no authority to stop the process.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Well, bye.

I really, really hope this is true:

DC would of course instantaneously be improved the millisecond this clown steps on a plane to leave for the last time.
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Good riddance. Swalwell is everything wrong with D.C. wrapped up in one package.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Swalwell is the worst of America. He is a thief and has no morals whatsoever. I wonder what he gave up to China via Fang Fang.

Hope his wife, as stupid and marxist as she must be, cleans him out and he goes to prison.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Purging more vermin at the lovely FBI:
Quote:

We reported Thursday on the bizarre trophy FBI officials gave themselves to congratulate their team on the failed Arctic Frost probe, Special Counsel Jack Smith's Don Quixote-like quest to destroy Donald Trump over alleged "election interference."

Smith himself faced prolonged grilling Thursday at a House of Representatives Judiciary Committee Hearing, and the short version is: he came off looking like a partisan hack who had exactly zero scruples when it came to his maniacal effort to bring down the (at the time private citizen, and now once again president) Donald Trump.
FBI Director Kash Patel, who announced the bizarre "trophy story" last night, wasn't done, however: he's reportedly sent at least eight agents who participated in the witch hunt to LinkedIn looking for new jobs.
Bye bye:
Quote:

FBI Director Kash Patel has carried out another round of firings inside the bureau, removing multiple senior officials connected to past federal investigations involving Donald Trump, according to an FBI source.
The dismissals include the special agent in charge of the Atlanta field office and the acting assistant director overseeing the New York field office, both of whom were tied to the two major federal criminal probes into Trump. A former special agent in charge from New Orleans, who had since moved into a different role within the bureau, was also removed.
In Miami, up to six FBI agents were reportedly let go due to their involvement in the bureau's search of Mar-a-Lago, a move that has remained a flashpoint in Trump's long-running conflict with federal law enforcement.



Good, though I'd like to see the FBI reduced to about a 5 man operation. More at the link.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Washington Post long ago became an arm of the swamp, merely publishing leftist propaganda, and apparently Bezos is tired of losing so much money to do so. I support the pending layoffs, as a weakening of the left's propaganda machinery is good for the republic.
Quote:

In fact, $50 million would not begin to save the Post. Bezos has spent more than that each year keeping it afloat. In 2023 the paper lost about $77million. In 2024, it reportedly lost $100 million.
Quote:

The Washington Post lost around $100 million in 2024 as top journalists defected to the publication's competitors, the Wall Street Journal reported Friday.

That figure is reportedly approximately 30% greater than The Post's losses in 2023. Advertising revenue at the publication also fell from $190 million to $174 million, WSJ wrote.

These losses are reportedly compounded by The Post also losing a significant number of digital subscribers. At least 250,000 people canceled their subscriptions after The Post chose not to issue an endorsement in the 2024 presidential election, breaking a longstanding pattern, the paper reported in October.

What were the losses in 2025? We don't know but probably similar to 2024. In other words, Bezos has probably spent more than a quarter billion dollars keeping the paper going for just 3 years. And my guess is that all the metrics are going in the wrong direction. In other words, there's no end in sight to the losses. But the staff reaction to his attempt to stop the bleeding is that he's not a good steward.

The tears at the link are delicious.

Halperin had a good interview with their one-time 'fact checker' Glenn Kessler last year, where the latter even claimed they couldn't write for conservative views because their readership was so left, or they'd lose subscribers if I recall correctly. Really, the whole conversation was fairly hilarious.

That we are STILL paying the salary of these types/groups is infuriating.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
USIP bimbo laughing about her current op. On Colbert Show pissed me off a bit this am.
Serious Lee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Minor setback, Ed is one of the few real ones in the DOJ that isn't in it for hisself.

nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yes, reading some horrific speculation, but Ed Martin isn't shy, I'd expect him to have some things to say if this is true:

And he's just been posting as usual the past month;
Serious Lee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
don't know if its bondi or blanche at this point, but i hope trump has a trick up his sleeve cause he has to know who is stonewalling everything at this point, and it sure as hell wasn't Ed.

nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rubio/Trump or someone had to send the damn marines to retrieve our flag from the World Health Organization after our withdrawal from the sham Chicom bull**** group.

More at the link, I encourage anyone/everyone to read it.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Serious Lee said:

don't know if its bondi or blanche at this point, but i hope trump has a trick up his sleeve cause he has to know who is stonewalling everything at this point, and it sure as hell wasn't Ed.



Trump ally Ed Martin improperly leaked grand jury material
You can turn off signatures, btw
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Update: The FBI is still completely full of traitors to the republic, from top to bottom.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This piece of **** better be prosecuted.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Democrat-communists are trying desperately to set the next impeachment trap suing some bogus whistleblower complaint against Tulsi.

It's failing, obviously, but I don't expect liars like Mark Warner to STFU about it anyway. Tulsi: 'blatant lie.'
Quote:

Warner was responding to a Wall Street Journal report on Monday that said Gabbard was sitting on "a whistleblower complaint that is so highly classified it has sparked months of wrangling over how to share it with Congress."

Ooh, sounds like a spy movie.

The original complaint didn't even accuse Gabbard of wrongdoing; rather, it alleged that someone was engaging in misconduct inside an intelligencecommunity program.

Of course, the WSJ report was based almost entirely on anonymous sources and also contained this little tidbit: "A representative for the inspector general said the office had determined specific allegations against Gabbard weren't credible, while it couldn't reach a determination on others."

Mark Warner doesn't care about such niceties (or the facts). In an NBC interview Thursday, he accused Gabbard of trying to keep it all secret and said she was "not competent to do the job."
Gabbard fired back:
Quote:

Senator Mark Warner and his friends in the Propaganda Media have repeatedly lied to the American people that I or the ODNI 'hid' a whistleblower complaint in a safe for eight months.
This is a blatant lie.
The truth: - I am not now, nor have I ever been, in possession or control of the Whistleblower's complaint, so I obviously could not have "hidden" it in a safe. Biden-era IC Inspector General Tamara Johnson was in possession of and responsible for securing the complaint for months.


Quote:

...I concur with the conclusion that the Biden-era IC IG, Tamara Johnson, reached regarding the non-credible nature of the complaint and the re-review that the current IC IG, Chris Fox, conducted, reaching the same conclusion. The ensuing media firestormfed by speculation and little factwas an attempt to smear @DNIGabbard and the Trump Administration.

Gabbard then punched back at Warner by saying that if there was anyone unqualified in the matter, it certainly wasn't her:
Quote:

- Either Senator Warner knows these facts and is intentionally lying to the American people, or he doesn't have a clue how these things work and is therefore not qualified to be in the U.S. Senateand certainly not the Vice Chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee.


She then laid out a detailed chronology of the situation, which she argued could lead to only one conclusion:
Quote:

Senator Warner's decision to spread lies and baseless accusations over the months for political gain, undermines our national security and is a disservice to the American people and the Intelligence Community.



Sounds like a made up Vindman-Ciaramella pile of dog**** lies to me.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You can be certain Mark Warner is lying. Again.

There is no lie scumbags like him won't tell to advance the power of The Party. They'll be working overtime since this is an election year.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not close to Trump, but the White House; 'revision' in the story-narrative.

Yes, that's the same lawyer Vindman/Ciaramella used as well.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Serious Lee said:

don't know if its bondi or blanche at this point, but i hope trump has a trick up his sleeve cause he has to know who is stonewalling everything at this point, and it sure as hell wasn't Ed.




Alex Jones is full of it. Why are you still believing anything he says? It's all self-promotional.

Blanche is the bad guy now? LOL

I'm Gipper
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nortex97 said:

Not close to Trump, but the White House; 'revision' in the story-narrative.

Yes, that's the same lawyer Vindman/Ciaramella used as well.
Vindman, Ciamarella, and the lawyer should all spend the rest of their lives in prison, along with these new liars. They are lying in an attempt to deny millions of Americans the government they voted for, which would be effectively overturning the election. And it's a conspiracy.
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ellis Wyatt said:

You can be certain Mark Warner is lying. Again.

There is no lie scumbags like him won't tell to advance the power of The Party. They'll be working overtime since this is an election year.

Yep, get ready to be hit with weekly reports of scandals within the administration. The Democrats are desperate to get control of the House so they can not only block any meaningful legislation, but keep Trump and his cabinet tied up in impeachment hearings for the next two years.

Republicans have to turn out this November and maintain the majority or the next two years will be a complete crapshow.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tulsi swats back at this blatant idiocy.

Sounds like someone is about to be fired, imho. I'd say charges are likely, but we all know that's not how Bondi rolls.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good news for the election meddlers


I'm Gipper
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
A grand conspiracy case would require confirmed USA's and staff to prosecute, RICO etc. is not simple litigation at all.

Separately China has used both their own and our money to fund the 'Palestinian' (Hamas) rioters on campuses, and other NGO groups such as Code Pink etc. This is blatantly obvious now as a subversive operation the CCP has conducted for years, with the tacit support of much of our swamp/deep state/Democrats.


Medea Benjamin of Code Pink notoriety should absolutely be an easy target for various wire fraud/sedition charges imho. '…enemies foreign and domestic.'
fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Two things here: a conspiracy case isn't a RICO case, correct?

Secondly, there's 2-3 threads here that are extremely informative. I'm very grateful for the work and passion y'all have brought to this thread.

I keep up fairly well, but there's so much more out there that's good, accurate information.

My understanding about conspiracy laws is the SOL's don't start until the conspiracy has ended, which I don't believe has happened. RICO isn't the same, to my knowledge.

Oh, and it's hard to take anyone named "Madea" seriously.
Hate is how progressives sustain themselves. Without hate, introspection begins to slip into the progressive's consciousness, threatening the progressive with the truth: that their ideas and opinions are illogical, hypocritical, dangerous, and asinine.
This is backed by data.
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I was literally ten feet away from that @#$@#$ Medea Benjamin and Code Pink in DC back when the Iraq War started.

that is nearly 24 years of them supporting every single enemy of the West.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There are different federal criminal conspiracy statutes that could be used, but as well the racketeering influence and corruption could also attach. Part of the issue involves the statute of limitations yes but I think it's likely a broader conspiracy case against a set of actors/people would use RICO as there are clear organizations/networks involved.

18 USC 241, conspiracy against rights is plausible of course but probably not dramatic enough. The act of covering up the voter fraud in Georgia thru Jan 2024 (via falisified/modified images) as uncovered in the Fulton County search recently makes much of the plausible conspiracy ongoing through that date.

Again, this would/should be high level litigation, if it happens (which I know some expect it never to do). Above my pay grade, respectfully.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Any more to go.

Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Slash it more!
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LFG.

50K is a good start.
American Hardwood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:

Any more to go.



....and my life hasn't change one tiny bit. Smallest government is bestest government!
The best way to keep evil men from wielding great power is to not create great power in the first place.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.