Yesterday, @katiehobbs filed to get our lawsuit thrown out.

Today, records revealed nearly a quarter of a million ballots were rejected on Election Day in Maricopa County in a race that came down to just 17K votes.

She's illegitimate & she knows it.

More evidence to come. pic.twitter.com/Z4jFSVQjIx

— Kari Lake War Room (@KariLakeWarRoom) January 24, 2023

🚨Breaking🚨

Shelby Bush confirms after reviewing the system log files from the tabulators on election day, nearly a quarter-million ballots were misread.

With 446 tabulators across the county, there's no doubt the integrity of the election in Maricopa County was compromised. pic.twitter.com/GKyW8kFNQz

— Kari Lake War Room (@KariLakeWarRoom) January 23, 2023

🚨 BOMBSHELL DISCOVERY 🚨

Today’s Senate Testimony CONFIRMS nearly 40,000 ballots illegally counted (10% of the signatures reviewed).

I think all the “Election Deniers” out there deserve an apology. pic.twitter.com/3g2x5zgd2c

— Kari Lake (@KariLake) January 23, 2023

https://pjmedia.com/uncategorized/matt-margolis/2023/01/24/theres-another-huge-bombshell-in-kari-lakes-election-lawsuit-n1664474

I watched that hearing yesterday. One of the witnesses was a computer science professor from A&M. He was very good in explaining what happened with the tabulators in Maricopa County on election day.

INB4

ThErEsNO elEccTIoN FrAuD

DrEvazanPhD said:

---

INB4

ThErEsNO elEccTIoN FrAuD

---

Yep, which concerned moderate will be first?

DrEvazanPhD said:

---

INB4

ThErEsNO elEccTIoN FrAuD

---

Currently awaiting talking points.

Beep beep boop boop

V
V
V

Rejected = Never Counted At All?

Sounds like a civil rights lawsuit is required.
250,000 were disenfranchised.

Election fraud and the lack of finding the actual results is tied at the top on my list of biggest concerns of our country (tied with 2A attacks).

They did it once and NOTHING happened to them - they mocked any one who questioned - even Republicans went along and didn't want to be labeled a conspiracy nut.

So of course they did it again - and will do it again

CMs - so where is the proof?

Apparent voter disenfranchisement- crickets.

TxTarpon said:

---

Rejected = Never Counted At All?

Sounds like a civil rights lawsuit is required.
250,000 were disenfranchised.

---

That's the problem. No way to tell if they were ever counted. That was part of the A&M professor's analysis. About those Door #3 ballots that were not tabulated at the voting centers but were supposedly "tabulated" at MCTEC on the tabulators at central counting. Problem is those tabulators would also be using the same ballot definition files, so they would not be capable of being tabulated there, either.

Walter Daugherity is his name.

TheCurl84 said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

I watched that hearing yesterday. One of the witnesses was a computer science professor from A&M. He was very good in explaining what happened with the tabulators in Maricopa County on election day.

---

Dr Bart Childs??

Probably no longer alive. Definitely no longer teaching.

---

But reliably votes Democrat.

Is anything actually going to happen?

chase128 said:

---

Is anything actually going to happen?

---

It is a newly formed state senate committee on elections. The goal is to make suggestions for changing election laws going forward to correct the many mistakes made in the past.

That could also include less reliance on outside vendors such as Dominion and Runbeck.

Nothing will come of this. Just cheat, better!

93MarineHorn said:

---

I can't tell what this really means. Lake has lost credibility since election day when it comes to these claims. Guys, this is a loser issue for conservatives unless they bring proof.

---

They brought the proof yesterday as to the 2022 midterms. They were hampered by the fact that election officials refused open records requests until just a week or so ago when they finally got the slog files.

Eventually somebody has to follow through and eject a sitting politician if this is ever going to stop.

We have anarchists burning the country, election corruption, and godless immorality behind multiple mass shootings here in California, while I'm working on the state of our mental health.

Think I'm done with the news for today.

It won't change when the governing bodies won't look at the evidence/proof and declare fraud occurred. Without fraud being actually called fraud by these authorities, nothing will change.

Republicans would be well served to take the word "BOMBSHELL" out of their vernacular.

After the Giuliani and Trump teams constantly made a fool out of themselves with "BOMBSHELL!" and "KRAKEN!", anytime most people read that in a tweet or news article they immediately categorize it as sensational bull*****

Election Fraud Deniers...

There is no proof that they will ever accept and additionally there is no proof that YOU will ever accept.


1) Sworn Testimony in Georgia of hundreds or thousands of 'Mailed In' Ballots that were marked exactly the same and with NO FOLDs. How do you mail a ballot in a standard envelope with no folds? No Fraud there

2) Semi Driver says he drove a pallet full of ballots from NY to PA, no fraud there.

3) A suitcase full of ballots under a table in GA on video, No fraud there.

4) 4 Swing States stop counting ballots at the same time. No Fraud there.

5) 2000 Mules shows all kinds of ballot harvesting, No Fraud there.

6) Harris County Republican Precincts conveniently run out ballots

7) Kari Lake up 13% points a week before the election. Delays when counting ballots cause her to lose. No fraud there.

I don't think many of you would accept sworn testimony from the Democrat who won the election...

Quote:

---

I don't think many of you would accept sworn testimony from the Democrat who won the election...

---

How about just win a court case?

93MarineHorn said:

---

Quote:

---

They brought the proof yesterday as to the 2022 midterms. They were hampered by the fact that election officials refused open records requests until just a week or so ago when they finally got the slog files.

---

I feel like we've been down this road with Lake before. "Bombshell" and then nothing. Was any of the evidence touted as "Bombshell" questioned or scrutinized by Democrats. Was the presenter of the evidence "cross examined" by anyone? Could there be a reasonable explanation for all of it?

---

This was a state senate committee hearing not a trial setting. But all of the senators were asking questions of the witnesses.