They 'won' so the ends justify the means, and the evidence doesn't matter. "The glove doesn't fit.... so you must acquit" is their mantra.... not only for murdering people, but for murdering our electoral process.RoadkillBBQ said:RedComyn said:Oh no, multiple? And you're certain they're all for Biden and not Trump like all the people that were caught voting for him twice elsewhere because he'd convinced them the election was going to be stolen and so they thought they'd try to counter that?TheEternalPessimist said:There is, and you are a blind fool or a techno-corporatist tool if you can see it. Multiple duplicate ballots with matched signatures.RedComyn said:TheEternalPessimist said:
There is now more than enough evidence to de-certify. AZ needs to do this asap.
Then on to Georgia, Wisconsin, and PA.
They CAN NOT STOP what is coming.
There isn't and you're not going to do anything but whine and complain more as you continue to lose.
Well gosh if you're so certain that it's all in Biden's favor then I guess we're just going to have to tell you to suck it up and deal with it because there's no legal mechanism to undo any of this and not one of you is going to do anything else despite all your weekend warrior spec-ops cosplay fantasies.
NOONE whether a Republican or Democrat should be ok with election fraud.
It's sad that you appear to be.
Maricopa County Audit -- See Staff Note in OP
30,171 Views |
362 Replies |
Last: 10 mo ago by Funky Winkerbean
I hope that's sarcasm.larry culpepper said:Well the audit was completed and it showed Biden won by an even bigger margin, but okay.MasonStorm said:
Anyone with a brain knows elections should be transparent and verifiable. The Democratic response is all the evidence you need.
This is NOT true - must you parrot the main stream media's false narrative?larry culpepper said:Well the audit was completed and it showed Biden won by an even bigger margin, but okay.MasonStorm said:
Anyone with a brain knows elections should be transparent and verifiable. The Democratic response is all the evidence you need.
Leftists are an insufferable lot..... hell bent on protecting their senile puppet and carrying out the cultural Marxist march by any means necessary.
larry culpepper said:Well the audit was completed and it showed Biden won by an even bigger margin, but okay.MasonStorm said:
Anyone with a brain knows elections should be transparent and verifiable. The Democratic response is all the evidence you need.
I read the MSN headline. I'm not going to bother looking for myself. Their word is their bond and I'm just a simple folk. You know. A moron.
Exactly - their resistance to audits only shows there is even more smoke arising from a potential fire.MasonStorm said:
Anyone with a brain knows elections should be transparent and verifiable. The Democratic response is all the evidence you need.
If you are confident that you won by so much, then why fight an audit? What are you scared of?
They are scared their fraudulent techniques for stealing elections is going to be exposed.
Interesting, but why would the color ballot be a solid triangle and the scanned/black and white be only an outline of a triangle?
Anyone know what color the stamp was? Regardless it wouldn't show up on black I guess but the stamp does show up when its over a red area.HTownAg98 said:TexAgs91 said:
Note the Verified & Approved stamp behind the arrow to the signature block. I'm sure you would pass these ballots as legitimate, right?
This is what it looks like in color before it is scanned. It's very possible their scanning didn't scan the whole block, just an outline. And their scan isn't in color.
But why would the scans make outlines instead of full color (the black triangles and the red signature box and triangles)?
To save ink?We fixed the keg said:
Interesting, but why would the color ballot be a solid triangle and the scanned/black and white be only an outline of a triangle?
Should have let Washington establish a meritocratic monarchy
Ok, so, yeah, I laughed. Thank you for that one.Funky Winkerbean said:To save ink?We fixed the keg said:
Interesting, but why would the color ballot be a solid triangle and the scanned/black and white be only an outline of a triangle?
Ok, that's plausibleHTownAg98 said:TexAgs91 said:
Note the Verified & Approved stamp behind the arrow to the signature block. I'm sure you would pass these ballots as legitimate, right?
This is what it looks like in color before it is scanned. It's very possible their scanning didn't scan the whole block, just an outline. And their scan isn't in color.
"Freedom is never more than one election away from extinction"
Fight! Fight! Fight!
Fight! Fight! Fight!
Except for the "scanned" copy would be a solid triangle regardless of color, not just an outline.Quote:
Ok, that's plausible
Sad thing is they're just useful idiots to whoever is manipulating and controlling our government. They're failing to see the true end game. America is on a path to cease to exist in its former glory. What country would they like us to resemble? Canada? Australia? Mexico? China?TheEternalPessimist said:They 'won' so the ends justify the means, and the evidence doesn't matter. "The glove doesn't fit.... so you must acquit" is their mantra.... not only for murdering people, but for murdering our electoral process.RoadkillBBQ said:RedComyn said:Oh no, multiple? And you're certain they're all for Biden and not Trump like all the people that were caught voting for him twice elsewhere because he'd convinced them the election was going to be stolen and so they thought they'd try to counter that?TheEternalPessimist said:There is, and you are a blind fool or a techno-corporatist tool if you can see it. Multiple duplicate ballots with matched signatures.RedComyn said:TheEternalPessimist said:
There is now more than enough evidence to de-certify. AZ needs to do this asap.
Then on to Georgia, Wisconsin, and PA.
They CAN NOT STOP what is coming.
There isn't and you're not going to do anything but whine and complain more as you continue to lose.
Well gosh if you're so certain that it's all in Biden's favor then I guess we're just going to have to tell you to suck it up and deal with it because there's no legal mechanism to undo any of this and not one of you is going to do anything else despite all your weekend warrior spec-ops cosplay fantasies.
NOONE whether a Republican or Democrat should be ok with election fraud.
It's sad that you appear to be.
CondensedFoggyAggie said:TheEternalPessimist said:For 100 years the Democrats gerrymandered the hell out of Texas, and your ilk clapped.CondensedFoggyAggie said:
At this point, if all these fake election fraud clickbait scams discourage republicans from voting, hey, be my guest!
Completely self inflicted wound, republicans can't win without blatant gerrymandering or screaming election fraud.
GOP has been drawing the districts in Texas since 2002. After another 81 years, we can talk about fair districts. Because we know if Dems drew the maps, they would do the same damn thing. Look at Maryland's gerrymander for example.... which far far worse than Texas.
We will KEEP voting while also challenging fraud in the system. Nice try troll.
Welp since every red state is supremely gerrymandered, at least you guys are consistent. Democracy means nothing to you, the constitution means nothing to you. Majority of dem states have independent redistricting commissions, you see, we do respect the law.
And don't worry, look at the politics and demographics of Texas under the age of 20, justice is coming, good riddance!
Justice? From what? Who didn't get justice?
Good riddance? Sounds like a threat. You won't like the result.
We fixed the keg said:Except for the "scanned" copy would be a solid triangle regardless of color, not just an outline.Quote:
Ok, that's plausible
Depends on how they set up their scanner. You can see on other larger text on the scan that the letters are outlined, like the box would be. The "save on ink" joke was a good one (thank you for that), so maybe they set it up to treat something that is more than so many pixels wide as white space on the inside to save on space?
I'm not sure the Democratic Party will hold on to certain demographics when this great political shift is complete. Parts of the valley will be purple, others will be red. Same goes for urban areas as well.
As for "independent" commissions - laughable. No one politician would allow for a truly independent deal to be done. There is a a trade going on, no doubt about it. Billions in federal spending and pork are at stake.
As for "independent" commissions - laughable. No one politician would allow for a truly independent deal to be done. There is a a trade going on, no doubt about it. Billions in federal spending and pork are at stake.
I can't buy this reason. Why would you try to show this as an anomaly if it was clearly part of the scanning system?HTownAg98 said:We fixed the keg said:Except for the "scanned" copy would be a solid triangle regardless of color, not just an outline.Quote:
Ok, that's plausible
Depends on how they set up their scanner. You can see on other larger text on the scan that the letters are outlined, like the box would be. The "save on ink" joke was a good one (thank you for that), so maybe they set it up to treat something that is more than so many pixels wide as white space on the inside to save on space?
"Independent redistricting commissions" generally just means that it's not politicians making the boundaries. It doesn't mean that it's being done without bias like some people want to claim.
So, should be an easy thing to answer. By that I mean, if this is the case, it should be consistent and repeatable in a quick test.HTownAg98 said:We fixed the keg said:Except for the "scanned" copy would be a solid triangle regardless of color, not just an outline.Quote:
Ok, that's plausible
Depends on how they set up their scanner. You can see on other larger text on the scan that the letters are outlined, like the box would be. The "save on ink" joke was a good one (thank you for that), so maybe they set it up to treat something that is more than so many pixels wide as white space on the inside to save on space?
Just as the OP has egg on their face for running with a small bit of incorrect information, spiking the ball with what we have seen so far shouldn't happen. MCBE should review all the info we are seeing today and validate what is and is not explainable and then move to the answer.
I would need to learn the explanation from this from the election officials.TexAgs91 said:
Note the Verified & Approved stamp behind the arrow to the signature block. I'm sure you would pass these ballots as legitimate, right?
100%We fixed the keg said:So, should be an easy thing to answer. By that I mean, if this is the case, it should be consistent and repeatable in a quick test.HTownAg98 said:We fixed the keg said:Except for the "scanned" copy would be a solid triangle regardless of color, not just an outline.Quote:
Ok, that's plausible
Depends on how they set up their scanner. You can see on other larger text on the scan that the letters are outlined, like the box would be. The "save on ink" joke was a good one (thank you for that), so maybe they set it up to treat something that is more than so many pixels wide as white space on the inside to save on space?
Just as the OP has egg on their face for running with a small bit of incorrect information, spiking the ball with what we have seen so far shouldn't happen. MCBE should review all the info we are seeing today and validate what is and is not explainable and then move to the answer.
So a dark stamp across a dark arrow? It makes sense that a scanner might not distinguish it.HTownAg98 said:TexAgs91 said:
Note the Verified & Approved stamp behind the arrow to the signature block. I'm sure you would pass these ballots as legitimate, right?
This is what it looks like in color before it is scanned. It's very possible their scanning didn't scan the whole block, just an outline. And their scan isn't in color.
aginlakeway
Joined:
Jul 13, 2008
Posts:
85,067
How long do you want to ignore this user?
larry culpepper said:Well the audit was completed and it showed Biden won by an even bigger margin, but okay.MasonStorm said:
Anyone with a brain knows elections should be transparent and verifiable. The Democratic response is all the evidence you need.
You really don't understand what this is uncovering do you? I'm sorry for you.
All one has to do is look at states which already use "independent redistricting commissions" and most if not all have districts drawn to heavily favor Democrats.Fenrir said:
"Independent redistricting commissions" generally just means that it's not politicians making the boundaries. It doesn't mean that it's being done without bias like some people want to claim.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
It appears that some states permit you to vote in person after you have mailed in a ballot. If you do both, the mail-in ballot is not counted.
For example, in Michigan, you can check on-line to see if your mail-in ballot was received. If it has not been received, you have the option of voting in person and the mail-in vote is not counted.
That said, I don't know if this is an option in Arizona.
For example, in Michigan, you can check on-line to see if your mail-in ballot was received. If it has not been received, you have the option of voting in person and the mail-in vote is not counted.
That said, I don't know if this is an option in Arizona.
HOLY ****
THEY CAPTURED THE LOG ROLLER(S) ON CAMERA!!!!!!!
Edit: For those not listening.
Log files were set for 20 mb....meaning when they fill up, old data is overwritten first in, first out.
They know the username used to roll or erase the logs.....they have the time stamp of when....they got the address of the machine(s) being used. Then used video cameras viewing those machines, at those time stamps, to identify those individuals.
How they kept that quite is amazing....
THEY CAPTURED THE LOG ROLLER(S) ON CAMERA!!!!!!!
Edit: For those not listening.
Log files were set for 20 mb....meaning when they fill up, old data is overwritten first in, first out.
They know the username used to roll or erase the logs.....they have the time stamp of when....they got the address of the machine(s) being used. Then used video cameras viewing those machines, at those time stamps, to identify those individuals.
How they kept that quite is amazing....
Just here to point out a couple falsehoods on this thread.
Not agreeing the election was stolen does NOT make someone a Biden voter or a liberal. The versus is also true.
OP was attacked for his source of information then I saw screenshots and tweets used as evidence.
Not agreeing the election was stolen does NOT make someone a Biden voter or a liberal. The versus is also true.
OP was attacked for his source of information then I saw screenshots and tweets used as evidence.
Stop knowingly spouting fake news. The conclusion in the audit report is that the election should be decertified. period.larry culpepper said:Well the audit was completed and it showed Biden won by an even bigger margin, but okay.MasonStorm said:
Anyone with a brain knows elections should be transparent and verifiable. The Democratic response is all the evidence you need.
No one cares about this....how many of them are fake, that's what we care about. You try to discredit the Cyber Ninjas but then use Maricopa County as a source, typical.Malibu2 said:That was always going to be the conclusion from Cyber Ninjas. You don't hire a never head of them Q Anon believing Election Was Stolen contractor like CN unless you're hiring them to find data the justifies a pre-arrived conclusion.captkirk said:Stop knowingly spouting fake news. The conclusion in the audit report is that the election should be decertified. period.larry culpepper said:Well the audit was completed and it showed Biden won by an even bigger margin, but okay.MasonStorm said:
Anyone with a brain knows elections should be transparent and verifiable. The Democratic response is all the evidence you need.
They counted and recounted the votes, found no meaningful discrepancy in the totals, but instead a list of anomalies or statistical oddities. Some of them are worth looking into, and several have already been debunked by Maricopa County as amateur hour shenanigans by a hapless contractor.
So recounting the same illegitimate and illegally cast ballots as last time should be the end of it? Perhaps your unfamiliar with the difference between a recount and an auditMalibu2 said:That was always going to be the conclusion from Cyber Ninjas. You don't hire a never head of them Q Anon believing Election Was Stolen contractor like CN unless you're hiring them to find data the justifies a pre-arrived conclusion.captkirk said:Stop knowingly spouting fake news. The conclusion in the audit report is that the election should be decertified. period.larry culpepper said:Well the audit was completed and it showed Biden won by an even bigger margin, but okay.MasonStorm said:
Anyone with a brain knows elections should be transparent and verifiable. The Democratic response is all the evidence you need.
They counted and recounted the votes, found no meaningful discrepancy in the totals, but instead a list of anomalies or statistical oddities. Some of them are worth looking into, and several have already been debunked by Maricopa County as amateur hour shenanigans by a hapless contractor.
This is true.... Multiple outcomes are still in play .... it is an absolute possibility of human error and not outright fraud for some of these issues.DallasAg03 said:
Just here to point out a couple falsehoods on this thread.
Not agreeing the election was stolen does NOT make someone a Biden voter or a liberal. The versus is also true.
OP was attacked for his source of information then I saw screenshots and tweets used as evidence.
To add, OP was slapped for using some data from a leaked draft which has been pointed out to not be an accurate/full picture of what the data meant. There is definitely data being presented that shows data on both sides, instances of concern, instanced of Biden being under counted by about 100 votes and Trump getting about 640 duplicate votes, etc. The issue is the cherry picking to fit bias.
Said on other thread, still need to hear from MCBE on the anomalies found before any definitive answers.