mazag08 said:

---

SB 43rd STREET OG said:

---

mazag08 said:

---

Funky Winkerbean said:

---

BluHorseShu said:

---

Tom Kazansky 2012 said:

---

eric76 said:

---

Tom Kazansky 2012 said:

---

Eric is one of the most lost posters on this site.

This thread is a great example. He came in here with his big boy pants on strutting ready to stick his bird chest out, pat himself on the back and give an "I told you so" to all the reasonable people who asked "wtf was that" about our last circus of an election.

Dude didn't read the fine print and now has gotten taken for a ride by the msm and has egg on his face again. It's interesting that these gripping headlines are design around capturing the attention of low IQ individuals, and there goes Eric running off at a sprinter's pace to Texags. Picturing it is so damn funny and pathetic at the same time.

Eric, I need you to focus and don't forget to breathe.

---

You need to leave the echo chamber and take a look at reality.

---

CMs, are you watching? Or are you not interested anymore?

---

F16 has gone so full tilt crazy, anyone who doesn't toe the crazy conspiracy line is a CM. Honestly most threads read like the Q's of past. Most just drive by to take a quick peek at the dropping of baskets

---

Argue the evidence (figures being presented) and let's see how you reached your conclusions.

---

What was that sound?

Oh.. just the sound of him vanishing yet again after disparaging the entire board.

---

It's a "him"? Crazy how so many male democrats come across as unstable histrionic women.

---

Might be a her. I don't know nor do I care.

---

Gotcha, pretty sure it's a lonely, single, middle aged her/she. But you're right, it doesn't matter. Cheers

Malibu2 said:

---

I just did a been verified search for Jose Luis Rodriguez in Arizona. There are multiple unique Jose Luis Rodriguez's that share the same birth year and live in different cities. That was just 1 attempt to find a common name Are there 10,000 such cases, I don't know, but if someone has a names database to check that would be interesting to compare to this claim.

---

Or over 10,000 Mrs. Nussbaums. Or Nick Papagiorgios.

How does the "verified" stamp appear BEHIND the triangle on the printed envelope (EVB)?!

fooz said:

---

96% of ballots that came in Nov. 8-9 were duplicates.

Example:

---

Those aren't ballots, they are envelopes. They can be submitted multiple times as people come in and fix issues and cure their ballot.

Bubblez said:

---

fooz said:

---

96% of ballots that came in Nov. 8-9 were duplicates.

Example:

---

Those aren't ballots, they are envelopes. They can be submitted multiple times as people come in and fix issues and cure their ballot.

---

And what goes inside the envelopes?

Enviroag02 said:

---

How does the "verified" stamp appear BEHIND the triangle on the printed envelope (EVB)?!

---

One of you leftys please answer this...

Enviroag02 said:

---

How does the "verified" stamp appear BEHIND the triangle on the printed envelope (EVB)?!

---

RedComyn said:

---

TheEternalPessimist said:

---

There is now more than enough evidence to de-certify. AZ needs to do this asap.

Then on to Georgia, Wisconsin, and PA.

They CAN NOT STOP what is coming.

---

There isn't and you're not going to do anything but whine and complain more as you continue to lose.

---

There is, and you are a blind fool or a techno-corporatist tool if you can see it. Multiple duplicate ballots with matched signatures.

Here is the graph of the bad signature data show the numbers flip from 5% before election day to 95% of those found after election day.



red line is bad signatures

fooz said:

---

Bubblez said:

---

fooz said:

---

96% of ballots that came in Nov. 8-9 were duplicates.

Example:

---

Those aren't ballots, they are envelopes. They can be submitted multiple times as people come in and fix issues and cure their ballot.

---

And what goes inside the envelopes?

---

Nothing, for a envelope that had to be cured. Still only a single ballot.

Thanks OP for bringing back the Biden supporters. Now the question is will they actually go defend Biden or disappear again.

RedComyn said:

---

TheEternalPessimist said:

---

RedComyn said:

---

TheEternalPessimist said:

---

There is now more than enough evidence to de-certify. AZ needs to do this asap.

Then on to Georgia, Wisconsin, and PA.

They CAN NOT STOP what is coming.

---

There isn't and you're not going to do anything but whine and complain more as you continue to lose.

---

There is, and you are a blind fool or a techno-corporatist tool if you can see it. Multiple duplicate ballots with matched signatures.

---

Oh no, multiple? And you're certain they're all for Biden and not Trump like all the people that were caught voting for him twice elsewhere because he'd convinced them the election was going to be stolen and so they thought they'd try to counter that?

Well gosh if you're so certain that it's all in Biden's favor then I guess we're just going to have to tell you to suck it up and deal with it because there's no legal mechanism to undo any of this and not one of you is going to do anything else despite all your weekend warrior spec-ops cosplay fantasies.

---

At least you're not trying to play the odds game, like Malibu. Same first, middle, last, birth year AND signatures match on the ballots.

Sid Farkas said:

---

I've seen and heard enough to confirm my feeling that election integrity is lacking and that the left doesn't care

---

As long as they 'win' .... you hear claims that the election is the most 'free and fair' ever.

But when Trump won in 2016..... IT WAS RUSSIA! Then hoax story after story. These people want you to blindly trust their 'system' and never question them.

I am supposed to trust a party that thinks its perfectly acceptable to MUDER a human being up to the point of vaginal birth? They have NO moral compass and if they are willing to commit such evil against an innocent child, there is nothing that would stop them from lying, cheating, stealing, and any sort of grotesque sin against you.

TexAgs91 said:

---

Note the Verified & Approved stamp behind the arrow to the signature block. I'm sure you would pass these ballots as legitimate, right?

---

This is what it looks like in color before it is scanned. It's very possible their scanning didn't scan the whole block, just an outline. And their scan isn't in color.

CondensedFoggyAggie said:

---

At this point, if all these fake election fraud clickbait scams discourage republicans from voting, hey, be my guest!

Completely self inflicted wound, republicans can't win without blatant gerrymandering or screaming election fraud.

---

For 100 years the Democrats gerrymandered the hell out of Texas, and your ilk clapped.

GOP has been drawing the districts in Texas since 2002. After another 81 years, we can talk about fair districts. Because we know if Dems drew the maps, they would do the same damn thing. Look at Maryland's gerrymander for example.... which far far worse than Texas.

We will KEEP voting while also challenging fraud in the system. Nice try troll.

If that's the case, wouldn't it be more consistent. Why only on some envelopes?

Edit: envelopes not ballots