It's a Star Wars reference (the number of the stormtrooper who wasn't at his post because Han and Luke jumped him and stole his uniform). I don't remember that being in BvS. WAs that really his number?
Sex Panther said:AliasMan02 said:
And his prisoner number us TK-421. Hahahahaha get it?#
No?
Sex Panther said:
I actually commend them for what they tried to do with Luthor. They wanted to go with a new approach, and when I first heard basically evil Mark Zuckerberg, and seeing how good Eisenberg was in the Social Network, I thought it was a great sounding, fresh take.
Obviously though, for a variety of reasons it didn't work... It's unfortunate.
Quote:
Now, SP, if you mean that you liked the attempt to turn Luthor into a maniacal, unhinged character, then I have to respectfully disagree.
Sex Panther said:But yeah, Luthor is supposed to be an ultra calm and collected genius who is 20 steps ahead of everyone else... The maniacal, mad scientist we got was terrible.Quote:
Now, SP, if you mean that you liked the attempt to turn Luthor into a maniacal, unhinged character, then I have to respectfully disagree.
jackie childs said:
I'm starting to wonder if the "v" in "Batman v Superman" stands for Vander
I was going to see this movie in the theaters no matter what the reviews said. and honestly, the negative press will probably mean that it winds up exceeding my expectations.
Pro Ag said:Quote:
It's just unreal how many REALLY good moments in movies lately have been ruined because they're in the trailers first. I get wanting to build excitement, but such a waste.
I have wondered about that phenomenon and if that started before the reporting about the making movies. At any time it seems 20-25% of the threads here are about potentially upcoming stuff. So much so I don't frequent this board as much as I used to.
I'll never understand the folks that want so much information before a film is even done filming.