Maybe you should "pay your fair share" so it will be more affordable.
You assume I don't pay my fair share. I am not one of the rich people or corporations that don't pay **** in taxes.maroon barchetta said:
Maybe you should "pay your fair share" so it will be more affordable.
People who keep track of what other people's fair share (of something no one agreed to) are the people who line people up against walls. Watch out for your soul, homie.Know Your Enemy said:You assume I don't pay my fair share. I am not one of the rich people or corporations that don't pay **** in taxes.maroon barchetta said:
Maybe you should "pay your fair share" so it will be more affordable.
Beer Baron said:
You people are absolutely ruining a wholesome thread about people who slap their nether regions together on camera for our entertainment. Everyone clicked on this threat for two things: dick jokes and mormon jokes, and instead we get taxes and school shootings. No wonder the GB is a ghost town these days.
Network Neighborhood -> Moore Hall -> Golgo13 -> "6 Gigs of Porn" folderTequilaMockingbird said:
This is a real tragedy, as Pornhub is the only source for online porn on the interwebs.
Or so I've heard.
Quote:
I am disappointed in the lack of mentions of magic underwear.
Ragnar Danneskjoldd said:
I would say the wide availability of porn is a massive net negative for our civilization. Birth rates plummeting, testosterone levels plummeting, sex crime, incels, obesity, depression, overall societal degeneracy. I could keep going. I think porn is far more damaging to our national character than tobacco.
If this AI-created beer commercial is any indication, I think we're all in for some really fun fap sessions.Ginormus Ag said:
Just wait until it is combined with AI.
Don't disagree.but teens drinking and smoking, there are laws to prevent that from happening. This is no different.Brian Earl Spilner said:
Maybe, but as long as it exists, they'll continue to watch it.
It's certainly not going to cause lung cancer or a drunk driving accident.
Know Your Enemy said:I'd say birth rates plummeting is probably much more because of how unaffordable life is for the average citizen.Ragnar Danneskjoldd said:
I would say the wide availability of porn is a massive net negative for our civilization. Birth rates plummeting, testosterone levels plummeting, sex crime, incels, obesity, depression, overall societal degeneracy. I could keep going. I think porn is far more damaging to our national character than tobacco.
you should read moreKnow Your Enemy said:
I'd think it would be a good thing that people aren't having babies they can't afford instead of asking for government assistance but that's just me, I guess.
FIF this thread topicAggieArchitect04 said:
Psychologically speaking, I think I'd be affected way more seeing my classmates get blownawaythan watching some chick take it doggy style.
But that's just me.
AggieArchitect04 said:
Psychologically speaking, I think I'd be affected way more seeing my classmates get blown away than watching some chick take it doggy style.
But that's just me.
AliasMan02 said:AggieArchitect04 said:
Psychologically speaking, I think I'd be affected way more seeing my classmates get blown away than watching some chick take it doggy style.
But that's just me.
Shootings at schools are terrible and happen too often (more than zero is too often).
But... Exactly how common do you think it is for a kid to be "blown away" at school?
AliasMan02 said:
It's just a weird value comparison to try and equate.
That's not really what you said or implied. Be a little more clear next time.Know Your Enemy said:
I'd think it would be a good thing that people aren't having babies they can't afford instead of asking for government assistance but that's just me, I guess.
So you hate showing your papers to get into R rated movies, buy alcohol, buy cigarrettes, get into a bar, drive a car....?? Because those are basically the same thing. You had to show your papers to buy a Playboy magazine before the internet made print publications mostly useless. Did you complain then too?AggieArchitect04 said:AliasMan02 said:
It's just a weird value comparison to try and equate.
It is a little weird. I won't argue that. I'm just following the thread.
I think people are just sick (and angry) of school shootings. And when legislators are passing other things that are pretty innocuous by comparison, it begs the question - are they really prioritizing problems?
I don't have a solution but I also didn't assert myself as a political leader of a community.
But closer to the topic at hand, I don't like the idea of having to ID myself in order to watch porn. It's a little too close to…SHOW US ZUR PAPERS!!!!
You don't have to show ID to watch an R rated movie, drink alcohol, smoke cigarettes, etc in the privacy of your own home.agracer said:So you hate showing your papers to get into R rated movies, buy alcohol, buy cigarrettes, get into a bar, drive a car....?? Because those are basically the same thing. You had to show your papers to buy a Playboy magazine before the internet made print publications mostly useless. Did you complain then too?AggieArchitect04 said:AliasMan02 said:
It's just a weird value comparison to try and equate.
It is a little weird. I won't argue that. I'm just following the thread.
I think people are just sick (and angry) of school shootings. And when legislators are passing other things that are pretty innocuous by comparison, it begs the question - are they really prioritizing problems?
I don't have a solution but I also didn't assert myself as a political leader of a community.
But closer to the topic at hand, I don't like the idea of having to ID myself in order to watch porn. It's a little too close to…SHOW US ZUR PAPERS!!!!
agracer said:Don't disagree.but teens drinking and smoking, there are laws to prevent that from happening. This is no different.Brian Earl Spilner said:
Maybe, but as long as it exists, they'll continue to watch it.
It's certainly not going to cause lung cancer or a drunk driving accident.
Honestly don't understand why people have such a huge problem with this.
Brian Earl Spilner said:agracer said:Don't disagree.but teens drinking and smoking, there are laws to prevent that from happening. This is no different.Brian Earl Spilner said:
Maybe, but as long as it exists, they'll continue to watch it.
It's certainly not going to cause lung cancer or a drunk driving accident.
Honestly don't understand why people have such a huge problem with this.
Literally for the reason I said. The difference is no kid ever hurt anyone, including themselves, by spanking the monkey.
Know Your Enemy said:You don't have to show ID to watch an R rated movie, drink alcohol, smoke cigarettes, etc in the privacy of your own home.agracer said:So you hate showing your papers to get into R rated movies, buy alcohol, buy cigarrettes, get into a bar, drive a car....?? Because those are basically the same thing. You had to show your papers to buy a Playboy magazine before the internet made print publications mostly useless. Did you complain then too?AggieArchitect04 said:AliasMan02 said:
It's just a weird value comparison to try and equate.
It is a little weird. I won't argue that. I'm just following the thread.
I think people are just sick (and angry) of school shootings. And when legislators are passing other things that are pretty innocuous by comparison, it begs the question - are they really prioritizing problems?
I don't have a solution but I also didn't assert myself as a political leader of a community.
But closer to the topic at hand, I don't like the idea of having to ID myself in order to watch porn. It's a little too close to…SHOW US ZUR PAPERS!!!!
. Spanking the monkey is not the same as unrestricted access to porn for kids. How can you be this dense?Brian Earl Spilner said:agracer said:Don't disagree.but teens drinking and smoking, there are laws to prevent that from happening. This is no different.Brian Earl Spilner said:
Maybe, but as long as it exists, they'll continue to watch it.
It's certainly not going to cause lung cancer or a drunk driving accident.
Honestly don't understand why people have such a huge problem with this.
Literally for the reason I said. The difference is no kid ever hurt anyone, including themselves, by spanking the monkey.
. Guns are certainly the problemagracer said:And yet you've proposed no solutions to "kids dying in schools".Know Your Enemy said:I'm not in favor of that in the least but just keep pushing that false narrative while kids are dying in school.agracer said:Know Your Enemy said:The problem is that nothing is being done to prevent further school shootings. Sure they CAN do more than one thing at a time but they aren't. And blocking kids from PornHub is great but that isn't going to do a thing to keep kids from seeing porn online. There are millions of other options.Ragnar Danneskjoldd said:Just logical fallacy after logical fallacy from you. Does passing a law for firefighters pensions mean they also cant pass legislation dealing with school shooting? They're not mutually exclusive and are addressing different issues.Know Your Enemy said:
You're right, my bad. Since murder is already illegal we have done more than enough to make children safe in schools.
Just say it out loud. Ban all guns. Until then nothing else should be passed by any legislative body in the US.