Hypothetical scenario:SEsee said:Flexbone said:Did we award them to ourselves?SEsee said:TX_Aggie37 said:
It's funny that anyone, specifically tu folks, thinks any record or outcome beyond 10 or so years ago is even remotely relevant. If it didn't occur in the last 4 or so years, then it doesn't matter one bit to me since none of those players are still on the team. That's how I look at it.
So why go back and claim championships from the 1920s?
https://deadspin.com/5941380/texas-am-picked-up-two-national-championships-two-conference-titles-over-the-summer/amp
You did the 1997 and 2010 conference championships. Nebraska won the 1997 conference championship( and OU won in 2010.
The 1919 and 1927 championships were based off ratings created 60 plus years after the fact.
Embarrassing if you ask me. Apparently deadspin thought so as well.
Team A: Goes undefeated and underscored upon en route to a MNC
Team B: Gets embarrassed in their bowl game and still claims a MNC
which would be more embarrassing to claim?