There. fify, ****wad.Texasteasipper said:
This forum is obsessed with Texas, so its always going to attract pathetic, needy, masochistic Texas fans for Aggie fans' entertainment purposes.
There. fify, ****wad.Texasteasipper said:
This forum is obsessed with Texas, so its always going to attract pathetic, needy, masochistic Texas fans for Aggie fans' entertainment purposes.
Male on male crotch watchingFlexbone said:Thucydides1. said:
We won a national championship last week, you absolute moron.
In what?
Bunny costumesFlexbone said:Thucydides1. said:
We won a national championship last week, you absolute moron.
In what?
Nah.Champ Bailey said:
The reason Texas didn't have a chance in that NC game is two-fold. Colt didn't want to risk his draft position by playing through his injury, and Mack refused to bench Colt all year and give his backups any meaningful playing time. He even bragged about it, talking about how style points were the only way to get to the NC.
So then your primadonna QB goes out of the game, and you play a true freshman in his second college game ever (the first being one drive against UL Monroe) against Alabama. And you broke him.
goodAg80 said:Nah.Champ Bailey said:
The reason Texas didn't have a chance in that NC game is two-fold. Colt didn't want to risk his draft position by playing through his injury, and Mack refused to bench Colt all year and give his backups any meaningful playing time. He even bragged about it, talking about how style points were the only way to get to the NC.
So then your primadonna QB goes out of the game, and you play a true freshman in his second college game ever (the first being one drive against UL Monroe) against Alabama. And you broke him.
Bama was the better team.
You said the reason "Texas didn't have a chance" was two fold and cited two reasons, neither of which was "Bama was the better team".Champ Bailey said:goodAg80 said:Nah.Champ Bailey said:
The reason Texas didn't have a chance in that NC game is two-fold. Colt didn't want to risk his draft position by playing through his injury, and Mack refused to bench Colt all year and give his backups any meaningful playing time. He even bragged about it, talking about how style points were the only way to get to the NC.
So then your primadonna QB goes out of the game, and you play a true freshman in his second college game ever (the first being one drive against UL Monroe) against Alabama. And you broke him.
Bama was the better team.
Well obviously that too. That's why I said they didn't even have a single chance, not that they would have won.
Texan1976 said:BVAg85 said:
I don't know why sips will never acknowledge that they were the one school in a football crazy state that was given almost all the money and power. Of course they won a lot of games. They were just set up to succeed. It's just the way it was. But for they act like they weren't given those advantages. I'm a big Cowboys fan and look what happened to them once the NFL put in rules to even out the competition.
What's stopped A&M from getting even a mere conference title trophy since the Clinton administration?
When will you ever get another, not counting the laughable stolen valor claims you added a few years back?
I want to take this back the article linked by MSU/SECALUM. Here's a quote from the article that talks about we and Clemson:MSU/SECALUM said:
FPI projections show big trouble for Big 12
http://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/23012587/college-football-playoff-big-12-espn-fpi-projections
I absolutely love the fact we're going to play them in game 2.Quote:
Tigers on top
It's a Clemson sweep. In just about every projections category one can think of, the Tigers are the preseason leader.
Most projected wins? Check (11.4).
Best chance to win out through conference championships? Check (19 percent).
Best chance to win their conference? Check (69 percent).
Highest top-four strength-of-record chance? Check (54 percent).
In fact, Clemson's toughest game on the schedule right now is at Texas A&M on Sept. 8, a game the Tigers have a 76 percent chance to win.
This isn't a huge surprise after we revealed in February that the Tigers were No. 1 in our initial preseason FPI rankings (and still are, to be clear). But Clemson holds a substantial edge over the next-best team in many of these categories.
This.Flexbone said:Texan1976 said:MSU/SECALUM said:
FPI projections show big trouble for Big 12
http://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/23012587/college-football-playoff-big-12-espn-fpi-projections
One thing is for sure, MSU won't be doing a damn thing. What is it, 78 years since your one conference title?
MSU would be beat the absolute **** out of Texas.m and has been better than Texas for a decade.
88jrt06 said:
During A&M's time in the SECW, one team was in the cellar the most: Arkansas. The mutt.
So, tu...let's start with Arkansas. I'll spot you 4...yards.
Ole Miss, MSU, A&M, Auburn, LSU and Bama vary anywhere from easily better programs than tu to "You've got to be kidding me" in comparison. Year after year...very few exceptions.
tu is the kid looking longingly at the cool carnival ride...and the sign that says: "You must be this tall...to ride...".
Texas has a winning record with Alabama predominantly from a time before Texas' football team had desegregated, which says something about how long ago it was. And in the time since scholarship limits prevented them from pretty much locking up anyone with a pulse that could play, they're on even keel with Bama 1-1, the win being in 1982. The loss, well, you know...SEsee said:88jrt06 said:
During A&M's time in the SECW, one team was in the cellar the most: Arkansas. The mutt.
So, tu...let's start with Arkansas. I'll spot you 4...yards.
Ole Miss, MSU, A&M, Auburn, LSU and Bama vary anywhere from easily better programs than tu to "You've got to be kidding me" in comparison. Year after year...very few exceptions.
tu is the kid looking longingly at the cool carnival ride...and the sign that says: "You must be this tall...to ride...".
Texas has a winning record against every team in the SECW. They lead the series with Arkansas 56-22.
Which teams in the SECW does A&M have a winning record against?
nwspmp said:Texas has a winning record with Alabama predominantly from a time before Texas' football team had desegregated, which says something about how long ago it was. And in the time since scholarship limits prevented them from pretty much locking up anyone with a pulse that could play, they're on even keel with Bama 1-1, the win being in 1982. The loss, well, you know...SEsee said:88jrt06 said:
During A&M's time in the SECW, one team was in the cellar the most: Arkansas. The mutt.
So, tu...let's start with Arkansas. I'll spot you 4...yards.
Ole Miss, MSU, A&M, Auburn, LSU and Bama vary anywhere from easily better programs than tu to "You've got to be kidding me" in comparison. Year after year...very few exceptions.
tu is the kid looking longingly at the cool carnival ride...and the sign that says: "You must be this tall...to ride...".
Texas has a winning record against every team in the SECW. They lead the series with Arkansas 56-22.
Which teams in the SECW does A&M have a winning record against?
Something something about living in the past.
Also, not for nothing, but against MSST, you're tied at 2-2. One win was in 1922. The other in 1999. So, for any semblance of keeping current, you're losing to MSST back in the 90s. When comparing anything newer than the 60s, you're also tied with Ole Miss.
Since scholarship limits, you're also tied at 2-2 with Auburn, however if you even give Texas the 1974 matchup in stats, then you're losing 2-3. The other wins against Auburn were older than the Great Depression.
On the plus side for you, when looking at stats after the 60s, you're 1-0 versus LSU!
TX_Aggie37 said:
It's funny that anyone, specifically tu folks, thinks any record or outcome beyond 10 or so years ago is even remotely relevant. If it didn't occur in the last 4 or so years, then it doesn't matter one bit to me since none of those players are still on the team. That's how I look at it.
Did we award them to ourselves?SEsee said:TX_Aggie37 said:
It's funny that anyone, specifically tu folks, thinks any record or outcome beyond 10 or so years ago is even remotely relevant. If it didn't occur in the last 4 or so years, then it doesn't matter one bit to me since none of those players are still on the team. That's how I look at it.
So why go back and claim championships from the 1920s?
https://deadspin.com/5941380/texas-am-picked-up-two-national-championships-two-conference-titles-over-the-summer/amp
And yet NOBODY who isn't a) a Texas fan; AND b) absolutely insane thinks Texas is on the same level as several of those programs. Texas also has a losing record to Vanderbilt and South Carolina. Head to heads don't really mean all that much. They're a single data point, that's it.SEsee said:88jrt06 said:
During A&M's time in the SECW, one team was in the cellar the most: Arkansas. The mutt.
So, tu...let's start with Arkansas. I'll spot you 4...yards.
Ole Miss, MSU, A&M, Auburn, LSU and Bama vary anywhere from easily better programs than tu to "You've got to be kidding me" in comparison. Year after year...very few exceptions.
tu is the kid looking longingly at the cool carnival ride...and the sign that says: "You must be this tall...to ride...".
Texas has a winning record against every team in the SECW. They lead the series with Arkansas 56-22.
Which teams in the SECW does A&M have a winning record against?
I'm not the one that put those numbers up. That's waaaay before my time and therefore pretty much irrelevant to me. Good effort though.SEsee said:TX_Aggie37 said:
It's funny that anyone, specifically tu folks, thinks any record or outcome beyond 10 or so years ago is even remotely relevant. If it didn't occur in the last 4 or so years, then it doesn't matter one bit to me since none of those players are still on the team. That's how I look at it.
So why go back and claim championships from the 1920s?
https://deadspin.com/5941380/texas-am-picked-up-two-national-championships-two-conference-titles-over-the-summer/amp
Flexbone said:Did we award them to ourselves?SEsee said:TX_Aggie37 said:
It's funny that anyone, specifically tu folks, thinks any record or outcome beyond 10 or so years ago is even remotely relevant. If it didn't occur in the last 4 or so years, then it doesn't matter one bit to me since none of those players are still on the team. That's how I look at it.
So why go back and claim championships from the 1920s?
https://deadspin.com/5941380/texas-am-picked-up-two-national-championships-two-conference-titles-over-the-summer/amp
TX_Aggie37 said:
I don't know anybody who runs around beating their chest about those Aggie titles. Most of the Ags I know are realists and live in the now rather than grouping the past 100 years together.
No, Texas does not have a winning record against every SECW team. Texas is .500, 2-2 against Mississippi State if you count the game that was played in the 20's that they won. Modern time record 1990-present, Texas is 1-2, so Texas does not have a winning record against every SEC west member.SEsee said:88jrt06 said:
During A&M's time in the SECW, one team was in the cellar the most: Arkansas. The mutt.
So, tu...let's start with Arkansas. I'll spot you 4...yards.
Ole Miss, MSU, A&M, Auburn, LSU and Bama vary anywhere from easily better programs than tu to "You've got to be kidding me" in comparison. Year after year...very few exceptions.
tu is the kid looking longingly at the cool carnival ride...and the sign that says: "You must be this tall...to ride...".
Texas has a winning record against every team in the SECW. They lead the series with Arkansas 56-22.
Which teams in the SECW does A&M have a winning record against?
But that's what sips do best. It helps console them, I guess.TX_Aggie37 said:
I don't know anybody who runs around beating their chest about those Aggie titles. Most of the Ags I know are realists and live in the now rather than grouping the past 100 years together.
Arkansas hasn't won a conference title since the 1980s and that won't be changing.hogfan14 said:nwspmp said:Texas has a winning record with Alabama predominantly from a time before Texas' football team had desegregated, which says something about how long ago it was. And in the time since scholarship limits prevented them from pretty much locking up anyone with a pulse that could play, they're on even keel with Bama 1-1, the win being in 1982. The loss, well, you know...SEsee said:88jrt06 said:
During A&M's time in the SECW, one team was in the cellar the most: Arkansas. The mutt.
So, tu...let's start with Arkansas. I'll spot you 4...yards.
Ole Miss, MSU, A&M, Auburn, LSU and Bama vary anywhere from easily better programs than tu to "You've got to be kidding me" in comparison. Year after year...very few exceptions.
tu is the kid looking longingly at the cool carnival ride...and the sign that says: "You must be this tall...to ride...".
Texas has a winning record against every team in the SECW. They lead the series with Arkansas 56-22.
Which teams in the SECW does A&M have a winning record against?
Something something about living in the past.
Also, not for nothing, but against MSST, you're tied at 2-2. One win was in 1922. The other in 1999. So, for any semblance of keeping current, you're losing to MSST back in the 90s. When comparing anything newer than the 60s, you're also tied with Ole Miss.
Since scholarship limits, you're also tied at 2-2 with Auburn, however if you even give Texas the 1974 matchup in stats, then you're losing 2-3. The other wins against Auburn were older than the Great Depression.
On the plus side for you, when looking at stats after the 60s, you're 1-0 versus LSU!
Not involved in this discussion but just wanted to point out that Arkansas is 3-2 against Texas since joining the SEC lol
MSU/SECALUM said:No, Texas does not have a winning record against every SECW team. Texas is .500, 2-2 against Mississippi State if you count the game that was played in the 20's that they won. Modern time record 1990-present, Texas is 1-2, so Texas does not have a winning record against every SEC west member.SEsee said:88jrt06 said:
During A&M's time in the SECW, one team was in the cellar the most: Arkansas. The mutt.
So, tu...let's start with Arkansas. I'll spot you 4...yards.
Ole Miss, MSU, A&M, Auburn, LSU and Bama vary anywhere from easily better programs than tu to "You've got to be kidding me" in comparison. Year after year...very few exceptions.
tu is the kid looking longingly at the cool carnival ride...and the sign that says: "You must be this tall...to ride...".
Texas has a winning record against every team in the SECW. They lead the series with Arkansas 56-22.
Which teams in the SECW does A&M have a winning record against?