LMCane said:
jamey said:
My wife and myself did the math this weekend and we're just a little over 1 million. That's 2 401Ks, equity in house and a taxable account net
Said, "we're millionaires" and kinda laughed. It does not mean what it use to
But it was comforting to know we'd be around 2 million in about a decade with investments doubling, paying off house. 2 million, that's our goal. The comforting part was knowing we'd be right at it even if we stopped contributing to the 401K and taxable account within a few years.
for purposes of talking about being a millionaire-
the generally accepted method is investments not including your primary residence. Hence Accredited Investors as regulated by the SEC
How can individuals qualify as accredited?
Individuals (i.e., natural persons) may qualify as accredited investors based on wealth and income thresholds, as well as other measures of financial sophistication.
Financial Criteria
Net worth over $1 million, excluding primary residence (individually or with spouse or partner)
Income over $200,000 (individually) or $300,000 (with spouse or partner) in each of the prior two years, and reasonably expects the same for the current year
I would disagree..
net worth is exactly what it says, the net of your assets and liabilities. Primary residence equity is no different than say 401k accounts.. it's not always liquid, it depends on where you are in life.
Many people realize a lot of profit from the sale of a home, and nothing is preventing someone from selling a home and pocketing that equity.
My parents sold their texas home they owned outright, bought a CO home, and pocketed the $500k difference.
No reason why last year my dad wouldn't have considered that $1m+ of equity in his home as part of his portfolio, and today is the clear reason why. They aged, wanted to downsize, and realized a large chunk of the equity. It will probably happen again in 10 years.
We have some neighbors who moved from CA.. Bought the house here cash, and then a lot of toys and some rural land showed up in the picture.. so again, how was that CA home that appreciated a bunch not part of this guys wealth? yet a 401k is for a 40 year old?
Having said that, having $1m when a large chunk of it is your home, vs, $1m in liquid/retirement investments.. def. a different feeling.