quote:
quote:
If that's what you want, hire Bob Stitt.
quote:
"I treat fourth-down conversions as a turnover," Stitt told me in 2012. "We were 58 percent on fourth down [in 2012], went for 36 of them. Our opponents went for 18. We're a lot higher percentage than 58 when it's fourth-and-5 or less. I'll even go for it on fourth-and-8 when it's a situation where we're on the 50 or their 40.
"That's a turnover! If you get it, it's like the defense just got you the ball on their 50-yard line. We've got to be able to have confidence as an offense that - hey, when we get around the 50, Coach is gonna go for it and the defense has to have it in their head that, hey, they're gonna go for it, and if they don't get it, we have to get excited and make sure the opponent doesn't get points out of it.
"Man oh man, it's horrible for the opponent's defense to get you on third down, and they're all cheering, and then they stay out there. 'Oh no, we've gotta stop them again.' And then you get the first down. If it's third-and-long, the QB knows to take what the defense gives them because Coach is probably going for it on fourth."
LINK
I'd be totally down with Bob Stitt.
I am not going to claim to know what is similar and what contrasts between Stitt and Kelly... Worth looking into though. What impresses me about Kevin Kelly is that he's lead his team to an undefeated season as a head coach while laying a major beat down on Highland Park and others in the process. More importantly, his game plan goes beyond just going for it on 4th down past a certain yard marker.
For example, Kelly treats kickoffs as offensive opportunities... Instead of having two or three different onside kick plays, he incorporates a number of different packages, putting guys in motion, etc. Prepping for defensing this takes valuable practice time away from opposing teams because they, in turn, have to install a number of kick return packages. All this while still trying to prepare for a team that has an "extra offensive down" to work with. I know this falls into the realm of special teams and not under the OCs jurisdiction. It's just telling of his philosophy and how he looks to maximize every opportunity and turn it into an offensive one.
Furthermore, when you shorten the field of play for your defense, you effectively cut down the potential amount of time they are out on the field for any given possession. On the surface it sounds counter-intuitive. That being said, how many times have we seen a defense continuously get drug down field 70-80 yards and hold the opposition to field goals early in the game, only to be too gassed at the end to step up when it counts in the end.
Being able to negate this defensive wear and tear over the course of a season, all the while incorporating an offensive scheme to maximize every possession with a potentially hi-powered offense???? Sounds like it's worth the risk.
And IF it fails, there's always the Bubble-Screen Wonder to fall back on :/