CNN and others banned from White House

29,398 Views | 721 Replies | Last: 21 min ago by FatZilla
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag with kids said:

flown-the-coop said:

Charpie said:

So Trump will have no tv press pool now.



I mean, it was obvious what the next play is.

If CNN thinks it has a god given right to be in the room anytime POTUS wants have a gaggle, then no more gaggles.

Oopsie press.

And he'd STILL be more accessible to the press than Biden was...
Point well made & true
Look at the orators in our republics; as long as they are poor, both state and people can only praise their uprightness; but once they are fattened on the public funds, they conceive a hatred for justice, plan intrigues against the people and attack the democracy.
-Aristophanes
TXAggie2011
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TRO hearing started. Available for listening

833-990-9400, and the Meeting ID is 433360750
TXAggie2011
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Judge opened hearing with focus on the due process issue regardless of underlying 1st Amendment issues
HTownAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Which makes sense, because it's the same path he took on the Acosta case and a simpler issue to resolve at the TRO stage.
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's easy. Just shut down the briefings and the press room. Any judge gonna force that issue?
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXAggie2011 said:

richardag said:

MidRatsAg said:

ts5641 said:

The left and MSM always express outrage when a Republican president does anything and are silent when a dem pres does the same thing.


What Obama's admin did was hostile toward the press. Obama is no longer in office. Biden is no longer in office.

What Trump is doing is hostile toward the press and raises First Amendment questions. And, to add to that, he's tried similar things before and had his decisions struck down by courts. I think trying it again further erodes trust in our institutions - trust that is required for a workable democracy.

I don't care what color tie the President wears. I want them to be reasonably transparent and respect Freedom of the Press.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Where in this amendment does say anything about anyone or any organization has unqualified access to the White House?


No one has "unqualified access" to the White House just like no one has "unqualified access" to their Congressman's office to voice a grievance. But what the White House and your Congressman don't get to do is qualify your access based on your viewpoint. And they don't get to retaliate against you because they didn't like something you said.

Similarly, your local city can put restrictions on where and when people get to assemble and protest. What they don't get to do is approve and disapprove protests based on the viewpoint.

But you already knew that.
Show me that in the 1st Amendment
Look at the orators in our republics; as long as they are poor, both state and people can only praise their uprightness; but once they are fattened on the public funds, they conceive a hatred for justice, plan intrigues against the people and attack the democracy.
-Aristophanes
HTownAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nope, but I doubt he'll do that, because he likes being in front of a camera so much, and he likes calling out the fake news to their faces whenever he can.
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
HTownAg98 said:

Nope, but I doubt he'll do that, because he likes being in front of a camera so much, and he likes calling out the fake news to their faces whenever he can.

He doesn't need that room to call out the fake news and stand in front of a camera now does he.
HTownAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He doesn't, but this is the same person that created two tv shows starring himself.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HTownAg98 said:

Nope, but I doubt he'll do that, because he likes being in front of a camera so much, and he likes calling out the fake news to their faces whenever he can.
True, I enjoyed his quips pointed at the idiot leftist media.
IMNAL but contend much of this would be avoided by rewriting our slander and libel laws. The wording must be plain, narrow and on point. Any screw up would be used by the leftist progressives to attack conservatives.
Look at the orators in our republics; as long as they are poor, both state and people can only praise their uprightness; but once they are fattened on the public funds, they conceive a hatred for justice, plan intrigues against the people and attack the democracy.
-Aristophanes
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
HTownAg98 said:

He doesn't, but this is the same person that created two tv shows starring himself.

You're struggling here aren't you. Kinda funny.
HTownAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There's little desire by either side to do that, because they don't want a new law used against them.
HTownAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rockdoc said:

HTownAg98 said:

He doesn't, but this is the same person that created two tv shows starring himself.

You're struggling here aren't you. Kinda funny.

Bless your heart.
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
richardag said:

flown-the-coop said:

rsf0626 said:

BigRobSA said:

rsf0626 said:

Ahh state run media. Where have we heard that before?

How is this, in any way, "state run media"?

He's not dictating how they report news, nor what they report. We had the closest thing to that during COVID, under Biden.

Its called Trump TV. You really think they arent going to be running Trump propaganda on there?

FDR is asking on his weekly fireside chat what exactly is the problem with Trump posting his own announcements?

Pretty sure POTUS talking directly to the American people is constitutional.

it is astounding that people believe this tripe about President Trump shutting down the free press.
Wake me up when CNN, NBC, CBS, ABC studios are seized by the military and shut down.

CNN, NBC, CBS, and ABC are not new organizations anymore anyway, there is no money in it.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rockdoc said:

HTownAg98 said:

Nope, but I doubt he'll do that, because he likes being in front of a camera so much, and he likes calling out the fake news to their faces whenever he can.

He doesn't need that room to call out the fake news and stand in front of a camera now does he.

No no no, you don't understand the first amendment. It clearly states that if Trump is going to speak to the press, that CNN and MSNOW must be granted VIP seating.

It's very clear.
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
HTownAg98 said:

Rockdoc said:

HTownAg98 said:

He doesn't, but this is the same person that created two tv shows starring himself.

You're struggling here aren't you. Kinda funny.

Bless your heart.

I really don't need liberal blessings.
HTownAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not a liberal, despite what you may think. But keep trying.
HTownAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

Rockdoc said:

HTownAg98 said:

Nope, but I doubt he'll do that, because he likes being in front of a camera so much, and he likes calling out the fake news to their faces whenever he can.

He doesn't need that room to call out the fake news and stand in front of a camera now does he.

No no no, you don't understand the first amendment. It clearly states that if Trump is going to speak to the press, that CNN and MSNOW must be granted VIP seating.

It's very clear.

Who's aruging that? Point them out please and thank you.
TXAggie2011
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hearing is over. Seems CNN and others will get the tenpirary restraining order they asked for but the question is when and on what grounds
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
HTownAg98 said:

Not a liberal, despite what you may think. But keep trying.

Gosh you would have made a good one! Despite what you think!
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TXAggie2011 said:

Hearing is over. Seems CNN and others will get the tenpirary restraining order they asked for but the question is when and on what grounds

The only thing the TRO will ensure is how long the press corps is locked out of the White House.

Too funny.
HTownAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rockdoc said:

HTownAg98 said:

Not a liberal, despite what you may think. But keep trying.

Gosh you would have made a good one! Despite what you think!

So sad for you then.
HTownAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

TXAggie2011 said:

Hearing is over. Seems CNN and others will get the tenpirary restraining order they asked for but the question is when and on what grounds

The only thing the TRO will ensure is how long the press corps is locked out of the White House.

Too funny.

Did Trump ever formally kick out the entire tv pool? That's an honest question. I thought they all voluntarily stopped covering him.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
HTownAg98 said:

flown-the-coop said:

TXAggie2011 said:

Hearing is over. Seems CNN and others will get the tenpirary restraining order they asked for but the question is when and on what grounds

The only thing the TRO will ensure is how long the press corps is locked out of the White House.

Too funny.

Did Trump ever formally kick out the entire tv pool? That's an honest question. I thought they all voluntarily stopped covering him.

No, only the majors. The remainder of the pool kept going.

Just the crybabies.

But… if a judge says you have to let in lying propagandist toddlers, then you just don't let anyone in.

One on one interviews or WH camera and microphone.

A corrupt press association is sowing their own demise and irrelevance. Funny as *****
javajaws
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What Trump should do is stop the in-person press briefings altogether and instead go with an online statement where credentialed participants/reporters can post questions about it and the WH can selectively answer whatever questions they want - sort of like an online "ask me anything". If CNN doesn't like their questions getting answered then they will eventually have to ask better questions and not just shout out opinions and rebuttals.
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." - Ben Franklin
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
HTownAg98 said:

Rockdoc said:

HTownAg98 said:

Not a liberal, despite what you may think. But keep trying.

Gosh you would have made a good one! Despite what you think!

So sad for you then.

No I'm all good. Really!
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I say just let them in and stare at an empty podium. Then after an hour or so just turn out the lights.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Their passes have been revoked. No access to the grounds.

Only way to keep that straight is to revoked all hard passes. Period.

Tune in to TrumpTV. Submit questions in writing just like with Biden, he set the precedent.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?

BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

President Trump has provided a LIST of reported national security breaches by CNN. And they have until Friday at 5pm to respond to them.


If only he knew people with the power to charge, arrest and try them for breaking the law.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is better.
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Is the irony lost how our last president didn't (couldn't) communicate and now this one talks too much.

What a country.
KerrAg76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Free press somehow got equated to mean free access to everyone and everything
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The judge might as well go ahead and rule as we all know what his ultimate decision will be.
HTownAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It took him two days to rule in the Acosta case, and then he didn't even get to the 1A issues. It was all based on due process, because that's a much easier ruling to make. I would imagine the same will happen here.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.