infinity ag said:

---

Fox News also boycotts Trump

---

Yes, the lefty Murdoch successors and their champion Paul Ryan.

KillerAg21 said:

---

I'm not sure there are enough words that can be said to say how dystopian of an idea this is.

---

Conversely, there will never be a utopia as long as Dems are involved.

KillerAg21 said:

---

You people are odd to say the least.

---

You think we are theater kids?

Rockdoc said:

---

KillerAg21 said:

---

I'm not sure there are enough words that can be said to say how dystopian of an idea this is.

---

Conversely, there will never be a utopia as long as Dems are involved.

---

If you were insinuating Republicans are people that will lead to a utopian society, that would be hilarious.

KillerAg21 said:

---

Rockdoc said:

---

KillerAg21 said:

---

I'm not sure there are enough words that can be said to say how dystopian of an idea this is.

---

Conversely, there will never be a utopia as long as Dems are involved.

---

If you were insinuating Republicans are people that will lead to a utopian society, that would be hilarious.

---

I'm not. Relax lib.

Rockdoc said:

---

When you libs get back in the White House, and you will, you can do whatever you want.

---

Last time the lgbt were dancing in the streets almost 24/7, our economy turned into a huge turd sandwich and the trans docs enabled to slice and dice childrens genitals.

This was dumb when Obama and Biden did similar and it's dumb when OUR liberal does it.

I'm not overly aggravated but it's just more of his dumbassery on display.

Rockdoc said:

---

ThunderCougarFalconBird said:

---

Wouldn't the better play here be to let cnn and whoever into the room and simply never acknowledge them? You get the same result without all the performative nonsense litigation theater.

---

Yep. And when they start screaming and crying, just end the session.

---

Don't even end the session. Just let them scream and cry. At first to them, it will feel like sitting at a 20 minute long red light on an empty road at 3 am. But it will boil over. And the results will be hilarious - especially when the White House continually calls on "non traditional" media.

MidRatsAg said:

---

KillerAg21 said:

---

I'm not sure there are enough words that can be said to say how dystopian of an idea this is.

---

I used to think the people coming up with **** like this were bots, but here we are. People with Ag Tags are out here suggesting the First Amendment isn't really all that important because it's bad for Trump.

---

Nobody is suggesting that.

Rockdoc said:

---

KillerAg21 said:

---

I'm not sure there are enough words that can be said to say how dystopian of an idea this is.

---

Conversely, there will never be a utopia as long as Dems are involved.

---

And yet someone said something even more dystopian.

CNN merger will go thru. Will be hilarious to see if they waste money joining the lawsuit Politico/MSNOW have said they will file over this or not.

It’s official: Paramount wins and will acquire all of Warner Bros. The 12 Democrat attorney generals essentially folded. CNN will have a new, much saner owner. Huge media loss for Democrats. Now they just have MSNBC.

— Clay Travis (@ClayTravis) September 21, 2026

It's already been filed. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.296754/gov.uscourts.dcd.296754.1.0_1.pdf

I have now stayed in enough hotels where I have seen every episode of forensic files at least twice, so they can go ahead and kill HLN.

Nack to the thread, its hilarious and a bit frightening that the TDSed and Hate Americans think banning CNN and MSNOW from the WH briefing room is a threat to democracy.

Same folks who say ICE enforcing immigration laws is also a threat to democracy.

You know, if they were actually honest, they think flown-the-coop and other Trump supporters are the real threat to democracy.

Which is a crock of rancid horse manure. I would prefer CNN and MSNOW actually report honestly. Not pro-Trump, just honestly.

But just like Reagan republicans, supposed true conservatives, and concerned moderates, they are all just Hate Americans who channel their hate by saying Orange Man is evil and anyone who supports Orange Man is muh threat to democracy.

I don't see Natalie Harp listed as a defendant, so it appears the chem professors intel is wrong.

MidRatsAg said:

---

Red Fishing Ag93 said:

---

MidRatsAg said:

---

KillerAg21 said:

---

I'm not sure there are enough words that can be said to say how dystopian of an idea this is.

---

I used to think the people coming up with **** like this were bots, but here we are. People with Ag Tags are out here suggesting the First Amendment isn't really all that important because it's bad for Trump.

---

Nobody is suggesting that.

---

Your comment:

Quote:

---

Are we in a new era now where the world would be a better place without the "free press". I say yes. Individuals can make their case straight and unfiltered, untwisted to the people now.

The legacy media is the most damaging evil org on the planet.

---

The Free Press is explicitly covered in the First Amendment.

You did suggest that.

---

Blue parachute for you

Lib tears are splendid. Something new to cry about every day. Enjoy!

HTownAg98 said:

---

It's already been filed. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.296754/gov.uscourts.dcd.296754.1.0_1.pdf

---

God that filing reads like a scorned junior high ex-girlfriend. Too funny. And people make fun of lawsuits filed on behalf of Trump?

Saying that due process applies because the "news organizations" and "reporters" have 'property rights' in their hard press passes is laughable. Regardless, I assume the issuance of passes under Trump 2.0 included language they were subject to revocation without notice.

They also lead with lies / out of context quotes then whisper the facts and full context later.

Trump was explicit and clear that they were banned for LYING and spreading fiction as fact.

The media has been caught in multiple lies and hoaxes. The media has shown an openness and willingness to alig with one political party and disregard the other. When they do that, they cease to function as a free press.

Trump is fixing that.

If you believe in the US Constitution, you can read the below directly from Trump and understand he is protecting democracy with his decision to ban these organizations for their lies and vicious anti-American rhetoric
.

Ah, good to see, thx. Went to Judge Tim Kelly, a Trump appointee, though he is far from a partisan in a black robe as with Obama/Biden judges.

Handled the propagandist Jim Acosta case which Trump didn't win. He's also ruled against Trump on deportations several times.

Acosta https://t.co/Je8V6peZ4y

— Lauren G 🇺🇸 (@lbc360) September 21, 2026

Rockdoc said:

---

Lib tears are splendid. Something new to cry about every day. Enjoy!

---

It would be great if the people who are more interested in online flame wars and owning the libs put equal or greater weight into having a well-functioning country.

t_J_e_C_x said:

---

MidRatsAg said:

---

Red Fishing Ag93 said:

---

MidRatsAg said:

---

KillerAg21 said:

---

I'm not sure there are enough words that can be said to say how dystopian of an idea this is.

---

I used to think the people coming up with **** like this were bots, but here we are. People with Ag Tags are out here suggesting the First Amendment isn't really all that important because it's bad for Trump.

---

Nobody is suggesting that.

---

Your comment:

Quote:

---

Are we in a new era now where the world would be a better place without the "free press". I say yes. Individuals can make their case straight and unfiltered, untwisted to the people now.

The legacy media is the most damaging evil org on the planet.

---

The Free Press is explicitly covered in the First Amendment.

You did suggest that.

---

Blue parachute for you

---

I mean, no reason to ever actually look at the text of the constitution.

Quote:

---

First Amendment
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

---

It does not establish a "free press" It says, quite clearly, that CONGRESS shall make no LAW abridging the freedom of the press (press is not capitalized nor defined).

It becomes a weak argument that Trump, whilst still allowing multiple news agencies to cover the WH press briefings, allowing CNN access to live video feeds afforded to others who may not be in the room due to capacity and security constraints, is somehow abridging or curtailing press access.

It's a weak argument saying that them not having access to yell negative **** at him is somehow curtailing their ability to go on their free platforms and continue spouting that negative **** to the public without interference is abridging their freedom.

Simple facts at play here. Congress made no law here abridging the freedom of the press. POTUS made a decision based on whether to continue to allow propagandist agitators to attend WH briefings under the guise of "covering the news".

Given how deranged CNN has become and their long history of lies and fabrications, Trump should prevail here.

MidRatsAg said:

---

Rockdoc said:

---

Lib tears are splendid. Something new to cry about every day. Enjoy!

---

It would be great if the people who are more interested in online flame wars and owning the libs put equal or greater weight into having a well-functioning country.

---

Like the well-functioning state Gavin Newsom runs and your defense of how well he has done things?

Yep, no thank you.

MidRatsAg said:

---

Rockdoc said:

---

Lib tears are splendid. Something new to cry about every day. Enjoy!

---

It would be great if the people who are more interested in online flame wars and owning the libs put equal or greater weight into having a well-functioning country.

---

Oh brother.

flown-the-coop said:

---

MidRatsAg said:

---

Rockdoc said:

---

Lib tears are splendid. Something new to cry about every day. Enjoy!

---

It would be great if the people who are more interested in online flame wars and owning the libs put equal or greater weight into having a well-functioning country.

---

Like the well-functioning state Gavin Newsom runs and your defense of how well he has done things?

Yep, no thank you.

---

I don't think I've said anything at all, positive or negative, about California or Gavin Newsom.

I may have misremembered an old comment. I will edit mind.

It was the rapidly developing history of poor takes that concerns me more.

All MSM are enemies of the state. Don't watch any of them.

BREAKING: Outlets including FOX News, ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC, and others have collectively agreed to HALT coverage of President Trump after he banned CNN, MS Now, and Politico from the White House.

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) September 21, 2026

Hullabaloonatic said:

---

Thunderstruck xx said:

---

All MSM are enemies of the state. Don't watch any of them.

BREAKING: Outlets including FOX News, ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC, and others have collectively agreed to HALT coverage of President Trump after he banned CNN, MS Now, and Politico from the White House.

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) September 21, 2026

---

Hell ya bruther. Only listen to dear leader. All other sources are corrupt forces of evil.

---

I believe you're confusing Trump's actions towards those media outlets with what's done in North Korea and other similar countries.

Or maybe there's no confusion.

KillerAg21 said:

---

I'm not sure there are enough words that can be said to say how dystopian of an idea this is.

---

That's your brain on Trump. Constitution and common sense run a distant 2nd. If that high even.

When dems are in power "the Constitution is a living document that says whatever we want it to say."

When Republicans are in power "the Constitution says you can't do anything. "