What if it's 100% confirmed the 2020 election was stolen?

10,905 Views | 172 Replies | Last: 25 days ago by aggiehawg
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
91AggieLawyer said:

Quote:

So if it is 100% confirmed that the commie libs stole the 2020 election


First of all, it already has been 100% confirmed. Second, it wouldn't make one bit of difference because to the left, you would NEVER confirm anything they don't want to believe.

I don't know anyone like that around here.

Unassailable information just completely dismissed without any explanation except: I just don't want to believe you.

It's comical.
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

But there have been elections when the voting eligiible were disenranchide and habeas corpus was suspended.

If an election official comes to my ranch to try and disenranchide me, he's going to get a face full of buckshot!
Cyprian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Cyprian said:

Honestly, this might not be popular, but I would just politize the hell out of it, etc, and turn it into a ongoing commercial/ad for future elections to amp up the GOP base. I think if it gets used as something more than that, then the independents will turn away - and it will lead to massive future GOP losses once you've lost them as well.

I think you are incorrect and heres' why.

2016 was the disaffected GOP voters that Trump tapped in key states. Just stopped voting becaus the big cities always outnumbered them so why bother?

The same thing could easily happen to independents in a curse of both of your houses moment.


I am willing to hedge my bet: if we go full throttle on "base only" tactics, I predicting mid term losses once the "referee'" independents get exhausted. If I'm wrong and the disaffected 2016 style of voters show up in record numbers to carry us, I'll gladly eat crow. But historically, blowing off the middle is how you hand the keys back to the Dem's after a winning election cycle.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Smittyfubar said:

So if it is 100% confirmed that the commie libs stole the 2020 election, what do you think WOULD and/or SHOULD happens?

If the price isn't paid by the right people, we might as well quit the country now.


Sadly, I don't think anything legal will happen, but even if they do prove it completely, which they're well on the way to, the usual suspects will never believe it.

These are people that still think Trump called for a bloodbath because people didn't vote for him versus the automotive industry, and the good people comment, etc. And those were even on video.
“Some people bring joy wherever they go, and some people bring joy whenever they go.” ~ Mark Twain
Danny Vermin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You have to be some kind of moron to believe Biden got " 81" votes. We all know it was a PLANdemic so they could cheat with mail in ballots.
halfastros81
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If you don't want the US to continue down the current general path to socialist hellhole you vote in R primaries and you vote for the most conservative candidate rather than an incumbent with a poor voting record . Congressional voting records are scored by the American Conservative Union Foundation (ACUF) or Heritage Action .

Ag98and03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
shiftyandquick said:

1. Raid Georgia election infrastructure
2. Announce that it has been proven that the election was stolen
3. Announce federal takeover of all election apparatus in the country
4. Hold elections
5. Announce massive wins for GOP in elections

Profit.

Definitely how Putin would do it.
Ag98and03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm just dumbfounded about how many lies you will believe.

Trump lies over and over and over and over and over and over and over.

There were 60 court cases. He lost all but 1. I mean, that's the record of 1 win and 59 losses. How bad do you have to suck to have that record?

He could only get screwball attorneys, who ended up devastated professionally and financially. No real attorney is going to do this and risk their livelihood. Go ask Rudy Giuliani and Sydney Powell how they are doing.

He sent fake electors in and expected Pence to not certify the results. Fortunately, Pence found his spine and said no.

Fox News had to pay out 787 million to Dominion for their insanity on lying about voting machines.

Trump did not win.

Because he is psychologically damaged and unable to pivot from anything, he repeats about the losses over and over and over, lying to you guys constantly. And you believe it.

He could tell you anything and you would believe it. I will never understand why you believe him.
Law-Apt_3G
How long do you want to ignore this user?
2020 is calling and they want their lies back.
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag98and03 said:

I'm just dumbfounded about how many lies you will believe.

Trump lies over and over and over and over and over and over and over.

There were 60 court cases. He lost all but 1. I mean, that's the record of 1 win and 59 losses. How bad do you have to suck to have that record?

He could only get screwball attorneys, who ended up devastated professionally and financially. No real attorney is going to do this and risk their livelihood. Go ask Rudy Giuliani and Sydney Powell how they are doing.

He sent fake electors in and expected Pence to not certify the results. Fortunately, Pence found his spine and said no.

Fox News had to pay out 787 million to Dominion for their insanity on lying about voting machines.

Trump did not win.

Because he is psychologically damaged and unable to pivot from anything, he repeats about the losses over and over and over, lying to you guys constantly. And you believe it.

He could tell you anything and you would believe it. I will never understand why you believe him.




Tldr
I dont read bs
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nothing ever happens.
GeorgiAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag98and03 said:

I'm just dumbfounded about how many lies you will believe.

Trump lies over and over and over and over and over and over and over.

There were 60 court cases. He lost all but 1. I mean, that's the record of 1 win and 59 losses. How bad do you have to suck to have that record?

He could only get screwball attorneys, who ended up devastated professionally and financially. No real attorney is going to do this and risk their livelihood. Go ask Rudy Giuliani and Sydney Powell how they are doing.

He sent fake electors in and expected Pence to not certify the results. Fortunately, Pence found his spine and said no.

Fox News had to pay out 787 million to Dominion for their insanity on lying about voting machines.

Trump did not win.

Because he is psychologically damaged and unable to pivot from anything, he repeats about the losses over and over and over, lying to you guys constantly. And you believe it.

He could tell you anything and you would believe it. I will never understand why you believe him.



Don't waste your time. Groundhog Day. Same crap for six years.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And ironically, you've learned nothing.
ts5641
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Smittyfubar said:

So if it is 100% confirmed that the commie libs stole the 2020 election, what do you think WOULD and/or SHOULD happens?

If the price isn't paid by the right people, we might as well quit the country now.

It'll be very difficult to actually prove and prove who did what. But if so massively prosecute people involved. Then most importantly give Trump a 3rd term.
ts5641
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TheCurl84 said:

Nothing will happen in terms of punishing people. However, if theh GOP is on the ball, they will use the evidence to push forward election reforms that make such ceating much harder, if not impossible, in the future.

Quote:


If the evidence is effectively communicated to the American people, then most will support reforms.

Has this ever happened?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Right back at you.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ritaards won't accept that none of those propagandist "repeat the line" approved narratives about court cases that weren't heard on standing prove there was no fraud.

Biased judges not hearing cases doesn't prove a mass mailed in election was "the most secure election ever" no matter how much you repeat the line.

All of Trump's attempts at a remedy for that sham of an election, including exploring the idea of alternate electors- something democrats have done before- doesn't prove there was no fraud.

Some Fox hosts talking about dominion being open to the internet and then dominion being awarded a ridiculous sum by a biased judge doesn't prove there was no fraud.

Making fun of Rudy G and Sydney Powell doesn't prove there was no fraud.


You cannot refute the interference of the 51 people who signed that letter, big tech, and msm. You cannot refute that mass mailed elections have major integrity control gaps that can be easily exploited and cannot be audited.
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag98and03 said:

IThere were 60 court cases. He lost all but 1. I mean, that's the record of 1 win and 59 losses. How bad do you have to suck to have that record?

This is a lie of omission.

57 cases were dismissed based on technicalities, and 2 cases where there was actual discovery, the judges allowed the election officials to just add up bad numbers again and dismissed the case.

If these judges are infallible, how come we are now finding massive number of illegally counted votes that were not found in the previous court cases on the same district? How in the world did the infallible courts come up with two different conclusions? That just can't be the case.

Everyone knows that the judges around these cases were absolute cowards, scared of the mind-virus fearmongering from COVID, and punted all of these cases off of their desk ASAP justice be damned.

So, keep on with that win/loss record lie of yours if you want, but don't pretend like it's not propaganda.
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ts5641 said:

Then most importantly give Trump a 3rd term.

Um, no.

I know that this is just stupid trolling, but you gotta call out stupid trolling or the forum gets accused of being complicit.
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GeorgiAg said:

Ag98and03 said:

I'm just dumbfounded about how many lies you will believe.

Trump lies over and over and over and over and over and over and over.

There were 60 court cases. He lost all but 1. I mean, that's the record of 1 win and 59 losses. How bad do you have to suck to have that record?

He could only get screwball attorneys, who ended up devastated professionally and financially. No real attorney is going to do this and risk their livelihood. Go ask Rudy Giuliani and Sydney Powell how they are doing.

He sent fake electors in and expected Pence to not certify the results. Fortunately, Pence found his spine and said no.

Fox News had to pay out 787 million to Dominion for their insanity on lying about voting machines.

Trump did not win.

Because he is psychologically damaged and unable to pivot from anything, he repeats about the losses over and over and over, lying to you guys constantly. And you believe it.

He could tell you anything and you would believe it. I will never understand why you believe him.



Don't waste your time. Groundhog Day. Same crap for six years.

It might have taken Phil Connors something like 6,000 years worth of days waking up to Cher, but he did eventually learn some things.
TA-OP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
All the debate here is pointless if one side refuses to also address the question: what if it's 100% proven President Trump did NOT win?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TA-OP said:

All the debate here is pointless if one side refuses to also address the question: what if it's 100% proven President Trump did NOT win?

Go for it. Prove he lost.
Law-Apt_3G
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TA-OP said:

All the debate here is pointless if one side refuses to also address the question: what if it's 100% proven President Trump did NOT win?


He didn't win. We are debating about realities of those imagining the election was not stolen. Which you are right, it is pointless thread for you.
Old McDonald
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag98and03 said:

I'm just dumbfounded about how many lies you will believe.

Trump lies over and over and over and over and over and over and over.

There were 60 court cases. He lost all but 1. I mean, that's the record of 1 win and 59 losses. How bad do you have to suck to have that record?

He could only get screwball attorneys, who ended up devastated professionally and financially. No real attorney is going to do this and risk their livelihood. Go ask Rudy Giuliani and Sydney Powell how they are doing.

He sent fake electors in and expected Pence to not certify the results. Fortunately, Pence found his spine and said no.

Fox News had to pay out 787 million to Dominion for their insanity on lying about voting machines.

Trump did not win.

Because he is psychologically damaged and unable to pivot from anything, he repeats about the losses over and over and over, lying to you guys constantly. And you believe it.

He could tell you anything and you would believe it. I will never understand why you believe him.

Texas12&0
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump should get a 3rd term.
The Sun
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Shooter McGavin said:

I would, Clockwork Orange style, make that old hag Pocahontas - who throws out that question to every R she questions - watch the proof over and over again.


And then scalp her.
JamesE4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I believe it can easily be proven that there are more ballots that are either obviously fraudulent (many with same signature or no signature, 100% of military ballots for biden, etc.) or should not have counted per the state law (submitted after deadline, not certified, voters that should not have been eligible for mail in, etc.) to men it was stolen.

However, the D side that encouraged, enabled and cheered these events will never acknowledge it.

Really, a second Trump term now is better than consecutive terms for the country.
Ag98and03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

TA-OP said:

All the debate here is pointless if one side refuses to also address the question: what if it's 100% proven President Trump did NOT win?

Go for it. Prove he lost.

uhhhh When the results were all tabulated and Biden was sworn in.

Pretty sure that shows that Trump, in fact, did not win.
Ag98and03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusterAg said:

Ag98and03 said:

IThere were 60 court cases. He lost all but 1. I mean, that's the record of 1 win and 59 losses. How bad do you have to suck to have that record?

This is a lie of omission.

57 cases were dismissed based on technicalities, and 2 cases where there was actual discovery, the judges allowed the election officials to just add up bad numbers again and dismissed the case.

If these judges are infallible, how come we are now finding massive number of illegally counted votes that were not found in the previous court cases on the same district? How in the world did the infallible courts come up with two different conclusions? That just can't be the case.

Everyone knows that the judges around these cases were absolute cowards, scared of the mind-virus fearmongering from COVID, and punted all of these cases off of their desk ASAP justice be damned.

So, keep on with that win/loss record lie of yours if you want, but don't pretend like it's not propaganda.

Ummm these weren't dismissed because they left something off a form or someone forgot to sign a line.

They were dismissed because they were frivolous, without merit, or without standing.

Don't you think if they actually were correct, they would fix the "technicality" and try again? Come on now.

BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag98and03 said:

BusterAg said:

Ag98and03 said:

IThere were 60 court cases. He lost all but 1. I mean, that's the record of 1 win and 59 losses. How bad do you have to suck to have that record?

This is a lie of omission.

57 cases were dismissed based on technicalities, and 2 cases where there was actual discovery, the judges allowed the election officials to just add up bad numbers again and dismissed the case.

If these judges are infallible, how come we are now finding massive number of illegally counted votes that were not found in the previous court cases on the same district? How in the world did the infallible courts come up with two different conclusions? That just can't be the case.

Everyone knows that the judges around these cases were absolute cowards, scared of the mind-virus fearmongering from COVID, and punted all of these cases off of their desk ASAP justice be damned.

So, keep on with that win/loss record lie of yours if you want, but don't pretend like it's not propaganda.

Ummm these weren't dismissed because they left something off a form or someone forgot to sign a line.

They were dismissed because they were frivolous, without merit, or without standing.

Don't you think if they actually were correct, they would fix the "technicality" and try again? Come on now.




No standing, then latches.

Your right, it wasn't that a signature was left off, it was a collection of federal judges that are just cowards.

Again, if they were so infallible, why didn't the courts find the 400,000 illegally counted ballots in fulton county the first go around?
SpreadsheetAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Smittyfubar said:

So if it is 100% confirmed that the commie libs stole the 2020 election, what do you think WOULD and/or SHOULD happens?


Trump gets another term.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's true. Biden "won."
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
False. But you probably honestly have no idea what did happen. You don't seem like someone who seeks out facts. I can only imagine what Stephen Colbert or Jimmy Kimmel, or Jon Liebowitz had to say about it all.
BrazosDog02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We're still doing the stolen 2020 election? Haven't these types passed away by now or did they assimilate with the fake moon landing folks?
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There are still fake moon landing ritaards out there that think the mass mailed election of 2020 was the "most secure election ever" and shouldn't be questioned at all. No control gaps with mass mailings. Nothing questionable about stopping the counts late at the same time. Nothing notable about fake water main. breaks. Nothing to see here.

Fewest counties won by any winner ever, losing nearly all bellwether counties, more minority % votes for a republican in over 40 years, no one showing up to Biden "rallies" = shattering messiah Obama's popularity records and anyone curious or dubious is supposed to be the loon?


 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.