nu awlins ag said:

---

Not every Aggie is smart or logical. I've met more than my share in the O&G industry.

---

Agree.

I'm more suprised that he broke lib when his college and military career should have made him a recruiting poster conservative.

Doxxing her is fine. Let the public make her unemployable is also a good thing. Having the government take her license for espousing a vile opinion crosses the line. That is not the role of the government.

David_Puddy said:

---

The media is the main culprit of why these people have so much hate in their hearts. The media outlets continue to be the domestic enemy of our country, brainwashing the uneducated (and sadly also the educated) to hate anyone who is republican and voted for Trump

---

If the media had the grip and sway you seem to think, it wouldn't be circling the drain and desperate to keep the doors open a few days longer. It wasn't, for example, reporters who called Trump supporters "deplorable." It isn't reporters calling for violence on ICE. It isn't reporters teaching Marxist theories at colleges and universities. The media should take its share of blame, but it isn't some puppet master.

BBRex said:

---

David_Puddy said:

---

The media is the main culprit of why these people have so much hate in their hearts. The media outlets continue to be the domestic enemy of our country, brainwashing the uneducated (and sadly also the educated) to hate anyone who is republican and voted for Trump

---

If the media had the grip and sway you seem to think, it wouldn't be circling the drain and desperate to keep the doors open a few days longer. It wasn't, for example, reporters who called Trump supporters "deplorable." It isn't reporters calling for violence on ICE. It isn't reporters teaching Marxist theories at colleges and universities. The media should take its share of blame, but it isn't some puppet master.

---

It wasn't reporters who called BS on all this. They went along with it.

BBRex said:

---

David_Puddy said:

---

The media is the main culprit of why these people have so much hate in their hearts. The media outlets continue to be the domestic enemy of our country, brainwashing the uneducated (and sadly also the educated) to hate anyone who is republican and voted for Trump

---

If the media had the grip and sway you seem to think, it wouldn't be circling the drain and desperate to keep the doors open a few days longer. It wasn't, for example, reporters who called Trump supporters "deplorable." It isn't reporters calling for violence on ICE. It isn't reporters teaching Marxist theories at colleges and universities. The media should take its share of blame, but it isn't some puppet master.

---

No, but they are at the table with the puppet master. You'd have to be Stevie Wonder not to see this or Hellen Keller not to hear it.

Yep, they reported it. That's the job.

BBRex said:

---

Yep, they reported it. That's the job.

---

Reporting includes calling BS on BS. So, your response is, BS.

Tom Fox said:

---

Doxxing her is fine. Let the public make her unemployable is also a good thing. Having the government take her license for espousing a vile opinion crosses the line. That is not the role of the government.

---

Agree that's not the role of government, and I would fight against any government effort to penalize her even though I despise her opinion. Freedom from government retribution for speech is an important principle, even though many leftists won't equally defend it when the accused is conservative.

On doxxing, if she made her statement publicly under her own identity, then broader disclosure of it is fine. After all, she chose to make her profession public and assign her name to it.

If it's an anonymous account like yours and mine here on TexAgs, then doxxing is out of bounds. No one has a right to disclose personal information we chose to remain confidential.

Sharpshooter said:

---

BBRex said:

---

Yep, they reported it. That's the job.

---

Reporting includes calling BS on BS. So, your response is, BS.

---

Bingo. In his eyes they are just "doing their jobs" with out ethics or a moral compass. Basically accepting no accountability or responsibility. Just AI bots.

MemphisAg1 said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

Doxxing her is fine. Let the public make her unemployable is also a good thing. Having the government take her license for espousing a vile opinion crosses the line. That is not the role of the government.

---

Agree that's not the role of government, and I would fight against any government effort to penalize her even though I despise her opinion. Freedom from government retribution for speech is an important principle, even though many leftists won't equally defend it when the accused is conservative.

On doxxing, if she made her statement publicly under her own identity, then broader disclosure of it is fine. After all, she chose to make her profession public and assign her name to it.

If it's an anonymous account like yours and mine here on TexAgs, then doxxing is out of bounds. No one has a right to disclose personal information we chose to remain confidential.

---

I agree.

Reporting what happens is the job of the journalist. Giving commentary and opinion is the job of the columnist. Crossing those lines leads to problems. Informed consumers used to know the difference.

damiond said:

---

san antonio is the worst

---

Whelp, they pulled the video. I'm sure we've seen the last of her.

BBRex said:

---

Reporting what happens is the job of the journalist. Giving commentary and opinion is the job of the columnist. Crossing those lines leads to problems. Informed consumers used to know the difference.

---

True journalism has gone the way of podcasters. Media, are literal activists at this point.

BBRex said:

---

Reporting what happens is the job of the journalist. Giving commentary and opinion is the job of the columnist. Crossing those lines leads to problems. Informed consumers used to know the difference.

---

Well then, you don't know the difference now do you?

BBRex said:

---

Reporting facts is what happens is the job of the journalist. Giving commentary and opinion is the job of the columnist. Crossing those lines failing to report facts is what leads to problems. Informed consumers used to know the difference.

---

FIFY.

It's absolutely ****ing gross the **** that I'm seeing posted on Reddit. Makes me sick to my stomach. Ignorance and hatred and tribalism at its finest.

With that being said, I read a decent piece today that pointed to staffing at NWS being down 20% YoY and the Austin/SA region being down 5/25 employees with complaints of staff shortages. One of the jobs vacated being a management role responsible for warning and notice communication. It's not out of the realm of possibility that these cuts left voids.

IMO, we shouldn't even be having this discussion yet. This is a time for continued search and mourning. I assure you some of these parents are going to take up the mantle for finding out what went wrong here.

500,000ags said:

---

It's absolutely ****ing gross the **** that I'm seeing posted on Reddit. Makes me sick to my stomach. Ignorance and hatred and tribalism at its finest.

With that being said, I read a decent piece today that pointed to staffing at NWS being down 20% YoY and the Austin/SA region being down 5/25 employees with complaints of staff shortages. One of the jobs vacated being a management role responsible for warning and notice communication. It's not out of the realm of possibility that these cuts left voids.

IMO, we shouldn't even be having this discussion yet. This is a time for continued search and mourning. I assure you some of these parents are going to take up the mantle for finding out what went wrong here.

---

So, let's discuss the flooding in Texas.

Here are the facts many Democratic mouthpieces and some legacy media outlets are choosing to ignore:

1⃣ The National Weather Service (NWS) office in Austin / San Antonio was staffed with five meteorologists throughout the storms on… pic.twitter.com/7g2PvWRQcR

— Chris Martz (@ChrisMartzWX) July 6, 2025

Instead of calling the media the mainstream media, they should be referred to as the Democrat Propaganda Group. They are nothing like they maybe once were in some distant past.

Tom Fox said:

---

Doxxing her is fine. Let the public make her unemployable is also a good thing. Having the government take her license for espousing a vile opinion crosses the line. That is not the role of the government.

---

Maybe a hot take, but I don't want a pediatrician who hates half of the kids to treat any kids in the future. I'm 100% okay with her losing her license.

see page 1

Once again I am leading from behind. Will probably delete it. I just read she got fired. Good for her !!!

Cromagnum said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

Doxxing her is fine. Let the public make her unemployable is also a good thing. Having the government take her license for espousing a vile opinion crosses the line. That is not the role of the government.

---

Maybe a hot take, but I don't want a pediatrician who hates half of the kids to treat any kids in the future. I'm 100% okay with her losing her license.

---

That is not up to the government to determine from someone's speech. That is a slippery slope that we do not want in this country. Free speech should be protected.

Cromagnum said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

Doxxing her is fine. Let the public make her unemployable is also a good thing. Having the government take her license for espousing a vile opinion crosses the line. That is not the role of the government.

---

Maybe a hot take, but I don't want a pediatrician who hates half of the kids to treat any kids in the future. I'm 100% okay with her losing her license.

---

**** that *****. Go to hell.

Tom Fox said:

---

Cromagnum said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

Doxxing her is fine. Let the public make her unemployable is also a good thing. Having the government take her license for espousing a vile opinion crosses the line. That is not the role of the government.

---

Maybe a hot take, but I don't want a pediatrician who hates half of the kids to treat any kids in the future. I'm 100% okay with her losing her license.

---

That is not up to the government to determine from someone's speech. That is a slippery slope that we do not want in this country. Free speech should be protected.

---

Do you want your children to be treated by her? Do you want to risk she may care for your child differently versus others? You are a fool if you want that.

Tom Fox said:

---

Cromagnum said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

Doxxing her is fine. Let the public make her unemployable is also a good thing. Having the government take her license for espousing a vile opinion crosses the line. That is not the role of the government.

---

Maybe a hot take, but I don't want a pediatrician who hates half of the kids to treat any kids in the future. I'm 100% okay with her losing her license.

---

That is not up to the government to determine from someone's speech. That is a slippery slope that we do not want in this country. Free speech should be protected.

---

Are doctors not held to a moral and ethical standard? Doesn't the Hippocratic Oath have a standard of respect for human life?

This lady violated everything a physician should stand for and be.

WC87 said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

Cromagnum said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

Doxxing her is fine. Let the public make her unemployable is also a good thing. Having the government take her license for espousing a vile opinion crosses the line. That is not the role of the government.

---

Maybe a hot take, but I don't want a pediatrician who hates half of the kids to treat any kids in the future. I'm 100% okay with her losing her license.

---

That is not up to the government to determine from someone's speech. That is a slippery slope that we do not want in this country. Free speech should be protected.

---

Do you want your children to be treated by her? Do you want to risk she may care for your child differently versus others? You are a fool if you want that.

---

I have the option to not take my kids to her. The same as you. But I do not want the government to take away my professional license because of political speech no matter how vile.

Now if she acts on those beliefs and she is provided due process, that is different.

So long as she is in the private sector, the government should keep their asses out of speech.

Gaeilge said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

Cromagnum said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

Doxxing her is fine. Let the public make her unemployable is also a good thing. Having the government take her license for espousing a vile opinion crosses the line. That is not the role of the government.

---

Maybe a hot take, but I don't want a pediatrician who hates half of the kids to treat any kids in the future. I'm 100% okay with her losing her license.

---

That is not up to the government to determine from someone's speech. That is a slippery slope that we do not want in this country. Free speech should be protected.

---

Are doctors not held to a moral and ethical standard? Doesn't the Hippocratic Oath have a standard of respect for human life?

This lady violated everything a physician should stand for and be.

---

In their speech, no.

Well, TMB may be thinking otherwise. Sounds like it could fall under ethical and professional violations to me

Tom Fox said:

---

WC87 said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

Cromagnum said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

Doxxing her is fine. Let the public make her unemployable is also a good thing. Having the government take her license for espousing a vile opinion crosses the line. That is not the role of the government.

---

Maybe a hot take, but I don't want a pediatrician who hates half of the kids to treat any kids in the future. I'm 100% okay with her losing her license.

---

That is not up to the government to determine from someone's speech. That is a slippery slope that we do not want in this country. Free speech should be protected.

---

Do you want your children to be treated by her? Do you want to risk she may care for your child differently versus others? You are a fool if you want that.

---

I have the option to not take my kids to her. The same as you. But I do not want the government to take away my professional license because of political speech no matter how vile.

Now if she acts on those beliefs and she is provided due process, that is different.

So long as she is in the private sector, the government should keep their asses out of speech.

---

Based upon her public posts are you comfortable taking your children to her? Be honest.

WC87 said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

WC87 said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

Cromagnum said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

Doxxing her is fine. Let the public make her unemployable is also a good thing. Having the government take her license for espousing a vile opinion crosses the line. That is not the role of the government.

---

Maybe a hot take, but I don't want a pediatrician who hates half of the kids to treat any kids in the future. I'm 100% okay with her losing her license.

---

That is not up to the government to determine from someone's speech. That is a slippery slope that we do not want in this country. Free speech should be protected.

---

Do you want your children to be treated by her? Do you want to risk she may care for your child differently versus others? You are a fool if you want that.

---

I have the option to not take my kids to her. The same as you. But I do not want the government to take away my professional license because of political speech no matter how vile.

Now if she acts on those beliefs and she is provided due process, that is different.

So long as she is in the private sector, the government should keep their asses out of speech.

---

Based upon her public posts are you comfortable taking your children to her? Be honest.

---

Asked and answered.

Gaeilge said:

---

Well, TMB may be thinking otherwise. Sounds like it could fall under ethical and professional violations to me

---

Catch all bs like that can be used to censor speech from both sides and I am opposed to that.

If she takes some harmful actions to her patients, that is a different story.

Tom Fox said:

---

Gaeilge said:

---

Well, TMB may be thinking otherwise. Sounds like it could fall under ethical and professional violations to me

---

Catch all bs like that can be used to censor speech from both sides and I am opposed to that.

If she takes some harmful actions to her patients, that is a different story.

---

Her bias has shown that she cannot be trusted to offer the same level of care regardless of a patients political ideology.

Also, perhaps read up on this lady. Not the first time she's gone off the deep end.

Gaeilge said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

Gaeilge said:

---

Well, TMB may be thinking otherwise. Sounds like it could fall under ethical and professional violations to me

---

Catch all bs like that can be used to censor speech from both sides and I am opposed to that.

If she takes some harmful actions to her patients, that is a different story.

---

Her bias has shown that she cannot be trusted to offer the same level of care regardless of a patients political ideology.

Also, perhaps read up on this lady. Not the first time she's gone off the deep end.

---

That cuts both ways and is not the role of the government to police speech for private employment. Period. The end.

If I said I hate Arabs, cannot I still be an attorney in private practice if my clients still want to hire me?

Tom Fox said:

---

Gaeilge said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

Gaeilge said:

---

Well, TMB may be thinking otherwise. Sounds like it could fall under ethical and professional violations to me

---

Catch all bs like that can be used to censor speech from both sides and I am opposed to that.

If she takes some harmful actions to her patients, that is a different story.

---

Her bias has shown that she cannot be trusted to offer the same level of care regardless of a patients political ideology.

Also, perhaps read up on this lady. Not the first time she's gone off the deep end.

---

That cuts both ways and is not the role of the government to police speech for private employment. Period. The end.

If I said I hate Arabs, cannot I still be an attorney in private practice if my clients still want to hire me?

---

So if you are a conservative you are 100% ok with taking your children to her for care? If so you are an idiot. Z