Raise your hand if you don't believe there a sleeper cells in the US right now primed to act out a mass casualty event.Ellis Wyatt said:We should be terrified!KillerAg21 said:
https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2025/06/18/iran-threatens-irreparable-damage-if-us-enters-israel-conflict.html
Cruz on Tucker (Iran)
58,790 Views |
601 Replies |
Last: 1 day ago by Im Gipper
Lots of triggered snowflakes to my tweets.
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
No one is triggered by your posted tweets Ben.
You are a better poster than to post dumb stuff like this. You at Happy hour?
I'm Gipper
You are a better poster than to post dumb stuff like this. You at Happy hour?
I'm Gipper
Only on F16 would one of the absolute best Senators in the US be roasted for not knowing the precise demographics of Iran. He knows what needs to be done, and unlike Cronyn, has the huevos to openly back it.
Being in TexAgs jail changes a man……..no, not really
Tucker asked questions that would be reasonable to ask a high school senior. That a long standing senator got immediately flustered and couldn't respond is deeply embarrassing and reflects poorly on the senator.
Saw a tweet that said:
Say what you want about Trump, he never would have gotten tripped up like this.
"What's the population of Iran?"
"A lot. A lot, Tucker. There's a hell of a lot of people over there and they're very dangerous."
Nails.
Say what you want about Trump, he never would have gotten tripped up like this.
"What's the population of Iran?"
"A lot. A lot, Tucker. There's a hell of a lot of people over there and they're very dangerous."
Nails.
agracer said:Raise your hand if you don't believe there a sleeper cells in the US right now primed to act out a mass casualty event.Ellis Wyatt said:We should be terrified!KillerAg21 said:
https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2025/06/18/iran-threatens-irreparable-damage-if-us-enters-israel-conflict.html
So what are they waiting for?
Lol. I doubt any high school senior thay isnt somehow related directly with Iran knows the population thereof or its ethnic breakdown.
Lol
Lol
FlyRod said:
Tucker asked questions that would be reasonable to ask a high school senior. That a long standing senator got immediately flustered and couldn't respond is deeply embarrassing and reflects poorly on the senator.
Or he knew it was a dumbass irrelevant question and realize Tucker was only there to play word games
Agreed, there is intentional(?) mixing upjavajaws said:Literally nobody is talking about us getting into a war except the fear mongers that don't want to be in one. Being in a full on war with ground forces, etc is not the same as taking out some nuclear production bunkers. Nor does anyone really want part in establishing a new regime - leave that up to the people of Iran.KillerAg21 said:
I personally am shocked the people who voted for Trump because they didn't want to be involved in pointless wars are now ok with a pointless war. Tucker pointing that out would seem like a rallying call to conservatives. Especially because Cruz is a clown.
It's not MAGA without the military industrial complex though so it's on course. "We can't fix the domestic issues so let's go another 10 trillion in debt in the name of oil interests. "
-people advocating limited use of bunker buster bombs with
-advocates of full on war with Iran with
-advocates of regime change in Iran.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
BMX Bandit said:given this is the exact stance Trump has always had on Iran, anyone that is "WTF" is their own fault.Quote:
Candace Owens is another one that was very much Pro-war in Iraq, voted for Trump, but is now like "WTF" because like many conservatives they are realizing this is not what they voted for.
owens has changed her tune because she hates the jews. there is no denying that at this point.
Yeah, I guess he's not doing it to get re-elected. But he ran on a platform of no-new wars, if I recall correctly. America first. This doesn't feel like a "no-new wars" "America first" strategy.
Funny as heck seeing all our res libs showing up to white knight for Tucker Qatarson.
Bet we can find plenty of their previous posts trashing the guy.
Bet we can find plenty of their previous posts trashing the guy.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Has there ever been an sleeper cell in the US identified? I'm pretty sure this is another boogey man the media and hollywood uses to sell movies and manufacture consent for things like the Patriot Act. And we continue to fall for it.agracer said:Raise your hand if you don't believe there a sleeper cells in the US right now primed to act out a mass casualty event.Ellis Wyatt said:We should be terrified!KillerAg21 said:
https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2025/06/18/iran-threatens-irreparable-damage-if-us-enters-israel-conflict.html
https://www.naadsn.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Nash_Iran-and-Sleepers-Quick-Impact-2.pdf
He has always been very firm.
Iran CANNOT get nukes! He has never stayed from that. Sorry you didn't pay attention!
I'm Gipper
Iran CANNOT get nukes! He has never stayed from that. Sorry you didn't pay attention!
2019. Tucker Carlson interviews Trump and asks him about Iran.
— MAZE (@mazemoore) June 18, 2025
Iran had recently shot down an unmanned drone. Warmongers were pushing Trump to strike Iran but he decided not to. And as he has for years, Trump stated that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.
Very consistent. pic.twitter.com/7JrZK4a2mu
I'm Gipper
Have at it. He was quite a superstar around here when he was still carrying water for the GOP. There are plenty of old threads to review. Let us know what you find.Rapier108 said:
Funny as heck seeing all our res libs showing up to white knight for Tucker Qatarson.
Bet we can find plenty of their previous posts trashing the guy.
So is killing American citizens/military, murdering American citizens & kidnapping/torturing @ a festival firing missiles @ commercial tankers of numerous countries through proxies like Hamas, Hezbollah, Houthis.PaulsBunions said:javajaws said:…,,,…KillerAg21 said:
I …,,,…
Bombing another country is an act of war, this is just semantics.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Agreed. Sodom Hussein used poison gas(WMD) on his own citizens,most notably on a town of 60,000 compared to Islamic fundamentalists leaders calling for the destruction of the U.S. who are actively developing technology for nuclear bombs.Kvetch said:PaulsBunions said:
/thread
Honestly its pretty funny watching this board, who I assume are all old enough to remember being fed lies about Iraqi WMDs, clamor for another ME conflict 20 years later because of "muh 2 weeks away from Nukes".
It's pretty funny that you don't realize that this Middle East conflict has been ongoing since Iran-sponsored terrorist organizations paraglided into Israel on October 7 and massacred innocent people.
It's also pretty funny that you compare this conflict to Iraq when then dynamics of warfare are completely different than they were 20 years ago and Israel is carrying out the objectives.
But hey, I guess simple comparisons are all that some folks are able to comprehend.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
I believe this is a very real threat.aTmAg said:
Whatever they do it needs to happen fast. I can totally see Iran dispersing uranium to terrorists to use as a dirty bomb later.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Not Catholics but certain Catholic leadership in certain areas. People need to stop painting with a broad brush all the time.agracer said:There are no shortage of catholic bashers on Texags F/16Kvetch said:Quo Vadis? said:
Catholic organizations funded the facilitation of mass illegal immigration, which is far more harmful to the U.S. than anything AIPAC (your ridiculous boogeyman) has accomplished. Will you sit here and bash Catholics like you do the Jews?
I doubt it. But I'm sure you'll have some bull**** excuse queued up to defend your overt and misguided obsession with the Jews.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Im Gipper said:
No one is triggered by your posted tweets Ben.
You are a better poster than to post dumb stuff like this. You at Happy hour?
Is that so? Before I could even finish posting the handful of tweets I felt contributed to the conversation, my notifications turned blue with almost immediate pushback. I call that triggered. I couldn't even finish posting what I had in mind.
Look, this whole Iran thing has really opened my eyes about how many so called small government conservatives, or MAGA populists, were really just wearing John McCain skin suits with a MAGA hat.
Yall want to go fight another war in the Middle East. Well, the generation you sent last time seems overwhelmingly in the Tucker camp, and our current crop of cannon fodder deeply distrusts the government due to wokeism and war of terror fallout.
So, why don't you explain to me coherently how America has the people or the will to fight a war with Iran when Mexico is raping us daily?
I'll hang up and listen.
The answer is the black pill.
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
What if the bunker busters don't work? Then what? Boots on the ground to destroy it?
What if bombing can't prevent a nuclear weapon in the next year, two years, three years, five years, ten years?
What if Iran kills hundreds of U.S. Servicemen with their missiles? What is the response? Endless bombing?
Why did Trump approve Israel's attack when he knew it wouldn't work to take out their nuclear capacity? WTF?
What if bombing can't prevent a nuclear weapon in the next year, two years, three years, five years, ten years?
What if Iran kills hundreds of U.S. Servicemen with their missiles? What is the response? Endless bombing?
Why did Trump approve Israel's attack when he knew it wouldn't work to take out their nuclear capacity? WTF?
shiftyandquick said:
What if the bunker busters don't work? Then what? Boots on the ground to destroy it?
What if bombing can't prevent a nuclear weapon in the next year, two years, three years, five years, ten years?
What if Iran kills hundreds of U.S. Servicemen with their missiles? What is the response? Endless bombing?
Why did Trump approve Israel's attack when he knew it wouldn't work to take out their nuclear capacity? WTF?
Don't worry, according to the TexAgs moralists, it is the duty of Americans to die in far flung deserts and leave widows and orphans at home. Totally fine. If you do come home, according to the TexAgs moralists, enjoy your broken back and welfare rolls, while the Middle East continues being a backwards **** hole.
ETA God forbid you come back to Texas with chronic nerve pain from an Iranian bomb; THC has been banned by the same moralists who forced you to go to war.
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
I don't know how you can achieve the objective of 100% no chance of nukes without boots on the ground, and essentially occupying the country. Israel can't do it. I assume that US probably won't do it.BenFiasco14 said:shiftyandquick said:
What if the bunker busters don't work? Then what? Boots on the ground to destroy it?
What if bombing can't prevent a nuclear weapon in the next year, two years, three years, five years, ten years?
What if Iran kills hundreds of U.S. Servicemen with their missiles? What is the response? Endless bombing?
Why did Trump approve Israel's attack when he knew it wouldn't work to take out their nuclear capacity? WTF?
Don't worry, according to the TexAgs moralists, it is the duty of Americans to die in far flung deserts and leave widows and orphans at home. Totally fine. If you do come home, according to the TexAgs moralists, enjoy your broken back and welfare rolls, while the Middle East continues being a backwards **** hole.
BenFiasco14 said:Im Gipper said:
No one is triggered by your posted tweets Ben.
You are a better poster than to post dumb stuff like this. You at Happy hour?
Is that so? Before I could even finish posting the handful of tweets I felt contributed to the conversation, my notifications turned blue with almost immediate pushback. I call that triggered. I couldn't even finish posting what I had in mind.
Look, this whole Iran thing has really opened my eyes about how many so called small government conservatives, or MAGA populists, were really just wearing John McCain skin suits with a MAGA hat.
Yall want to go fight another war in the Middle East. Well, the generation you sent last time seems overwhelmingly in the Tucker camp, and our current crop of cannon fodder deeply distrusts the government due to wokeism and war of terror fallout.
So, why don't you explain to me coherently how America has the people or the will to fight a war with Iran when Mexico is raping us daily?
I'll hang up and listen.
The answer is the black pill.
Why do you keep equating air strikes as Iraq war 2.0?
Can we just rename this thread "argue against things no one is proposing"?
Teslag said:BenFiasco14 said:Im Gipper said:
No one is triggered by your posted tweets Ben.
You are a better poster than to post dumb stuff like this. You at Happy hour?
Is that so? Before I could even finish posting the handful of tweets I felt contributed to the conversation, my notifications turned blue with almost immediate pushback. I call that triggered. I couldn't even finish posting what I had in mind.
Look, this whole Iran thing has really opened my eyes about how many so called small government conservatives, or MAGA populists, were really just wearing John McCain skin suits with a MAGA hat.
Yall want to go fight another war in the Middle East. Well, the generation you sent last time seems overwhelmingly in the Tucker camp, and our current crop of cannon fodder deeply distrusts the government due to wokeism and war of terror fallout.
So, why don't you explain to me coherently how America has the people or the will to fight a war with Iran when Mexico is raping us daily?
I'll hang up and listen.
The answer is the black pill.
Why do you keep equating air strikes as Iraq war 2.0?
I'm not. Let's please dispose with the technicalities and realize I'm speaking about US involvement.
Simply calling balls and strikes as we are still in this preliminary stage. The amount of "go open a can of whoop ass" mentality I'm seeing on here is troubling.
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
shiftyandquick said:I don't know how you can achieve the objective of 100% no chance of nukes without boots on the ground, and essentially occupying the country. Israel can't do it. I assume that US probably won't do it.BenFiasco14 said:shiftyandquick said:
What if the bunker busters don't work? Then what? Boots on the ground to destroy it?
What if bombing can't prevent a nuclear weapon in the next year, two years, three years, five years, ten years?
What if Iran kills hundreds of U.S. Servicemen with their missiles? What is the response? Endless bombing?
Why did Trump approve Israel's attack when he knew it wouldn't work to take out their nuclear capacity? WTF?
Don't worry, according to the TexAgs moralists, it is the duty of Americans to die in far flung deserts and leave widows and orphans at home. Totally fine. If you do come home, according to the TexAgs moralists, enjoy your broken back and welfare rolls, while the Middle East continues being a backwards **** hole.
It's called a GBU-57, aka the MOP. Drop that thing on Fordow, this will set the mullahs back 30 years. The goal was never occupation.
Besides, if boots on the ground were the only option to stop them, wtf were obama and Biden doing?
Phatbob said:
Can we just rename this thread "argue against things no one is proposing"?
I'm fine renaming the thread and even pinning it to this board. When or if another war breaks out, I want all the people here advocating for it, and attacking people like Tucker Carlson as being Arab shills, to come back here and give me a convincing argument why Bob down the street from Plano, Texas, an agricultural major, had to go die in Iran or Israel. While a Mexican family moves into a duplex built on his dad's land.
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
BenFiasco14 said:Teslag said:BenFiasco14 said:Im Gipper said:
No one is triggered by your posted tweets Ben.
You are a better poster than to post dumb stuff like this. You at Happy hour?
Is that so? Before I could even finish posting the handful of tweets I felt contributed to the conversation, my notifications turned blue with almost immediate pushback. I call that triggered. I couldn't even finish posting what I had in mind.
Look, this whole Iran thing has really opened my eyes about how many so called small government conservatives, or MAGA populists, were really just wearing John McCain skin suits with a MAGA hat.
Yall want to go fight another war in the Middle East. Well, the generation you sent last time seems overwhelmingly in the Tucker camp, and our current crop of cannon fodder deeply distrusts the government due to wokeism and war of terror fallout.
So, why don't you explain to me coherently how America has the people or the will to fight a war with Iran when Mexico is raping us daily?
I'll hang up and listen.
The answer is the black pill.
Why do you keep equating air strikes as Iraq war 2.0?
I'm not. Let's please dispose with the technicalities and realize I'm speaking about US involvement.
Simply calling balls and strikes as we are still in this preliminary stage. The amount of "go open a can of whoop ass" mentality I'm seeing on here is troubling.
Because the devil is the details. Very few of us support a full boots on ground involvement of us forces. Many of us do support dropping a few GBU57's from B-2's.
BenFiasco14 said:Phatbob said:
Can we just rename this thread "argue against things no one is proposing"?
I'm fine renaming the thread and even pinning it to this board. When or if another war breaks out, I want all the people here advocating for it, and attacking people like Tucker Carlson as being Arab shills, to come back here and give me a convincing argument why Bob down the street from Plano, Texas, an agricultural major, had to go die in Iran or Israel. While a Mexican family moves into a duplex built on his dad's land.
I've deployed twice and think we should use our air power only. Do I get a pass from your walk of shame?
Teslag said:BenFiasco14 said:Teslag said:BenFiasco14 said:Im Gipper said:
No one is triggered by your posted tweets Ben.
You are a better poster than to post dumb stuff like this. You at Happy hour?
Is that so? Before I could even finish posting the handful of tweets I felt contributed to the conversation, my notifications turned blue with almost immediate pushback. I call that triggered. I couldn't even finish posting what I had in mind.
Look, this whole Iran thing has really opened my eyes about how many so called small government conservatives, or MAGA populists, were really just wearing John McCain skin suits with a MAGA hat.
Yall want to go fight another war in the Middle East. Well, the generation you sent last time seems overwhelmingly in the Tucker camp, and our current crop of cannon fodder deeply distrusts the government due to wokeism and war of terror fallout.
So, why don't you explain to me coherently how America has the people or the will to fight a war with Iran when Mexico is raping us daily?
I'll hang up and listen.
The answer is the black pill.
Why do you keep equating air strikes as Iraq war 2.0?
I'm not. Let's please dispose with the technicalities and realize I'm speaking about US involvement.
Simply calling balls and strikes as we are still in this preliminary stage. The amount of "go open a can of whoop ass" mentality I'm seeing on here is troubling.
Because the devil is the details. Very few of us support a full boots on ground involvement of us forces. Many of us do support dropping a few GBU57's from B-2's.
Okay. Carry on. We are talking past eachother. This thread is about the Tucker interview, not live military updates.
I'm fine with Israel's actions to date. I'm good with our actions to date.
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
Teslag said:BenFiasco14 said:Phatbob said:
Can we just rename this thread "argue against things no one is proposing"?
I'm fine renaming the thread and even pinning it to this board. When or if another war breaks out, I want all the people here advocating for it, and attacking people like Tucker Carlson as being Arab shills, to come back here and give me a convincing argument why Bob down the street from Plano, Texas, an agricultural major, had to go die in Iran or Israel. While a Mexican family moves into a duplex built on his dad's land.
I've deployed twice and think we should use our air power only. Do I get a pass from your walk of shame?
Not against use of air power
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
You nake a great point about the generational stuff.
It's also ironic LA is burning from foreigners and they fly foreign countries flag over the city but we have to go enter into another ME war half way across the globe without congress voting on it.
We should probably clean house first but that's just me.
It's also ironic LA is burning from foreigners and they fly foreign countries flag over the city but we have to go enter into another ME war half way across the globe without congress voting on it.
We should probably clean house first but that's just me.
Yukon Cornelius said:
You nake a great point about the generational stuff.
It's also ironic LA is burning from foreigners and they fly foreign countries flag over the city but we have to go enter into another ME war half way across the globe without congress voting on it.
We should probably clean house first but that's just me.
The moralists on TexAgs are totally fine with sending Americans to die in far flung deserts and be replaced by Mexicans and central/south Americans.
Sure would love to go to Arlington and tell my great uncle he fought in the pacific for the rights of mexicans, central and South Americans, to come take over the country.
How many promising young men and women have to die in foreign deserts for you people to wake up and clean house as Yukon put it?
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
Potential problem with just using air power, especially if our goal becomes what Israel wants (Regime change), is that we create power vacuums that are hard to control without boots on the ground. Remember, Iran was helping to fight ISIS. I'm pretty sure Iranian backed militias even coordinated with the US.
In general, I think most Iranians would not start joining up and forming extremist groups like ISIS. In fact, I highly doubt it. They're a pretty educated and peaceful population as a whole. But, what happens when a group does form, and there is no strong military to oppose it? How long before someone gets the bright idea that we need to put boots on the ground to stop it. Remember, this time it'll be different.
I'm sure Israel is just salivating at the idea of US troops on the ground, just like they went into this conflict knowing full well they would switch their messaging from "We can take care of Iran ourselves" to "the only way to stop Iran is for the US to get involved."
In general, I think most Iranians would not start joining up and forming extremist groups like ISIS. In fact, I highly doubt it. They're a pretty educated and peaceful population as a whole. But, what happens when a group does form, and there is no strong military to oppose it? How long before someone gets the bright idea that we need to put boots on the ground to stop it. Remember, this time it'll be different.
I'm sure Israel is just salivating at the idea of US troops on the ground, just like they went into this conflict knowing full well they would switch their messaging from "We can take care of Iran ourselves" to "the only way to stop Iran is for the US to get involved."
Featured Stories
See All
6:05
15h ago
4.3k
13:40
13h ago
2.5k
Pop Isaacs willing to do whatever it takes in the postseason
by Luke Evangelist
Mr. All-SEC! Forward Rashaun Agee earns third-team nod
by Richard Zane
Baseball Thoughts: Encouragement continues as SEC play arrives
by Ryan Brauninger
11:50
11h ago
1.0k
Marcus Hill loves Texas A&M's 'underdog' story
by Luke Evangelist
Vitani
Man arrested, accused of putting weights inside fish during tournament in East Texas
in Outdoors
5
SGrem
Man arrested, accused of putting weights inside fish during tournament in East Texas
in Outdoors
3
Junction71
Man arrested, accused of putting weights inside fish during tournament in East Texas
in Outdoors
2
Complete Idiot
Overlooked Portal Addition a Steal for A&M (per SMI)
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
2