FTA 2001 said:
Beat40 said:
FTA 2001 said:
BadMoonRisin said:
FTA 2001 said:
fixer said:
1609 political hacktivists with science degrees.
My original post was asking why I should believe the 1,609 scientists over the many many more scientist who came to opposite conclusions.
How many "conspiracy theories" about COVID and "The Science is settled" bull**** turned out to be 100% true and was called by most critical thinking people from the jump?
You arent following "Science" you are following a narrative. Again.
Seriously, no one can provide a strong argument for why these signatories should be trusted over the organizations I listed?
I see now that a lot of the signatories aren't even scientists. This makes me even more skeptical.
Why didn't you address my first response to you?
Because this thread isn't about COVID.
My first response wasn't about COVID. I only responded to this specific post because you asked for someone to make arguments. I just wanted your response on my arguements.
My first response was this:
If you subscribe to young earth being 6,000 years old, assuming reliable human records of temps is 250 years, that's only 4% of the earth's history. Further, significantly less than 1% if the earth is billions of years old. No serious business is making business altering decisions based on 4%, at most, of data.
Ice cores, which seem to be the basis for long term comparisons, can't even reliably tell rate of temp change in small increments. Now way scientists today can reliably compare the rate of the change today for the last 50, 100, 150, or 200 years to ice core data to confidently say it's the fastest rate of change in history.
The people screaming the loudest about climate emergency and demanding action now, still take private jets to Davos (and everywhere else), have houses by the ocean, and aren't urgently reducing their carbon footprint.
The scientists can't even tell us what the optimal temperature of the earth should be.
Anyone claiming science is settled is not a scientist. Science is never settled because that's not it's purpose.
The claims made, now are the same claims made the last 70 years - it's really hard to be a sky is falling person and be taken seriously after you've been wrong so many times.