bmks270 said:
Bitcoins last high may be behind us.
There's no reason to expect it to keep going up with most of the supply minted and miners sitting on 13% of circulation.
ETFs behind us.
Super Bowl ads behind us.
Adoption has peaked.
Miners need to slowly sell there bags or got bankrupt.
This is an interesting topic with alot of nuance around it.
I found
this article with the 13% figure you're quoting. Any chance you have further detail around that number? Ie how much of that is held by miners in which parts of the world and when was it mined? Technically, could Satoshi's never-touched ~million BTC be considered held by a miner per the statistics you site? (I'm not sure, just asking).
Miners mine for a variety of different reasons. To name a few:
1) Western world "for-profit" miners operate in the sense you're referring to. They have investors/lenders to satisfy and are trying to essentially earn fiat to pay bills + some leftover. These miners hold varying amounts of BTC, depending on their strategies.
US publicly traded miners don't hold much BTC right now. Last I've seen, MARA holds like 17k and RIOT like 8k. That's pretty small fries. CORZ doesn't hold any. I'd be surprised if US publicly traded miners hold more than 50-100k.
When you refer to "needing to sell bags or go bankrupt", it seems like you're referring to the miners of this sort. And you're right, these miners do need to sell at least some BTC on an ongoing basis to cover costs. You might enjoy
this article on cyclicality, miner capitulation and the effect it has on BTC price.
But not every miner operates that way...
2) There's also off-grid, stranded energy miners who essentially have "sunk" energy costs and mine for whatever they can earn. Some hold if they're into BTC. Some immediately convert to fiat. I don't think these miners are as cyclical.
3) A certain segment of miners mine for access to non-KYC BTC and don't ever have intention to sell.
4) Chinese miners mined a ton in the mid 2010s and may still be holding alot of it. Perhaps they are standing ready to sell their held stockpiles but, like 2 and 3, they aren't in a position where they have to sell to cover ongoing costs under fear of capitulation. Lots of them have already stopped mining anyway.
5) Like I mentioned before, time is a key aspect too and an important variable to understand when quoting 13% of BTC owned by miners. People could mine 50 BTC every 10 minutes for the first few years of the protocol and some of them probably still hold large quantities.
It's obvious you're not a fan of Bitcoin given your previous posts and that's cool. I'm not here to convince you otherwise. But unless you have access to nuanced miner info that I'm not aware of, I'd just suggest that your thesis about miners' control over price is a little unfounded. If anything, with the halving coming up and miners only able to mine 450/day, I'd suggest the exact opposite... that miner influence on price is declining and bordering on negligible.
If you're seeking ways that BTC price can be manipulated, I'd look more closely at "crypto" exchange coordination with large market-makers/traders.