TheHulkster said:
I don't disagree with you that it's up to law enforcement to do an investigation and the judicial system to judge these matters.
What I disagree with you with is the absurd notion that there's some sort of legal murkiness or liability in a journalist (or a filmmaker, or a film-making journalist) telling the truth.
In this thread we have posters who repeat talking points to discredit the content of the film. Half the country believes the truth that Trump was supporting extremist by reporting his words out of context. They also still believe the truth that Trump colluded with Russia during his election. Half the country believes the truth that the Hunter laptop is Russian misinformation. What is "truth" when your media continues to report lies without facing any consequences?