CSTXAg92 said:

---

Bidens leg hairs said:

---

Where was the Republican Party? Don't you think with all the millions in campaign funds that you would have a team of investigators and spies tracking the Democrat Party and trying to expose fraud like this?

---

Silent, if not complicit.

Trump was *truly* a Washington outsider. Republicans wanted him out of office as much as dims.

---

I've thought about your comment, or a version of your comment, a lot.

It's a given the Dems/Left were going to viscerally hate Trump. They've viscerally hated every single Republican president, and will continue to do so. From Reagan to '41 to '43, they were all going to "destroy America, democracy, my children, the world, and and college football". But Trump was and has been different.

The reason I bring this up is what exactly did Trump do that any other Republican president didn't do, except to be rough around the edges while speaking and pick his cabinet rather poorly. Otherwise, he had outstanding policies and pissed off a lot of our allies with frank conversations.

Even other Republicans turned on him; I'd say about 20% of elected Republicans supported getting rid of him. I understand RINO's, etc., but they NEVER supported getting rid of a sitting Republican president before. Have any of y'all ever wondered if there's something else the general public doesn't know about Trump, other than being an outsider. It's not like Trump was going to expose all of the corruption in DC, and elsewhere. He never got a chance, and never even got started. Our government has reached the the size that it can do what it wants, when it wants, so one man wasn't going to change it.

Just my 2 cents.

Half this board wants Candace owens to be president sooo......

RoadkillBBQ said:

---

Infection_Ag11 said:

---

Of course there was voter fraud, there has been fraud in every national election ever held in any country ever.

That being said I actually watched this while working on notes this morning and it left a lot to be desired. The foundation of the claim presented is the cell phone data tracking various "mules" to drop boxes and political headquarters. The problem is this is based on a rash of assumptions only some of which are reasonable.

Yeah the videos of the woman taking off her gloves and stuff is highly irregular, but the fact is 99.9% of the votes they counted in this documentary rely on said assumptions and some of them are baseless.

Now full disclosure, I have an inherent bias against D'Souza. I think he's a moron who has spent years grifting for profit. He gets absolutely obliterated in long form debates on any topic. Sam Harris, Hitchens and Jordan Peterson have all slapped him back to the Stone Age at various points. He's just not very bright and I don't believe he even believes half the content he puts out. He has a very Candice Owens vibe.

---

The cell phone tracking was to identify the time and locations for the 4 million minutes of surveillance video. The video footage is the real evidence.

Funny how that's questionable when the feds used the same information to identify and lock up the January 6th protestors.

---

But I've never supported criminal punishments for anything done on January 6th other than the rare incidents of actual violence. Now I've said I don't feel particularly bad for many of them because "play stupid games", but it's silly for the fed to be wasting resources locking up what amount to trespassers for years.

CSTXAg92 said:

---

Bidens leg hairs said:

---

Where was the Republican Party? Don't you think with all the millions in campaign funds that you would have a team of investigators and spies tracking the Democrat Party and trying to expose fraud like this?

---

Silent, if not complicit.

Trump was *truly* a Washington outsider. Republicans wanted him out of office as much as dims.

---

They control both sides, we have a one party system .. but at least people realize this now. I don't see this getting any better with time, the more people know, the more they will want change, I hope "they'" realize this and don't push it when it gets to the breaking point, there is no reason this can't be worked out, we still have one of the best countries in the world, it just needs some adjustments

Question about absentee ballots. Was the name and address of the voter on the ballot itself or just the envelope it was sent and addressed to?

aggiehawg said:

---

Hungry Ojos said:

---

Question about absentee ballots. Was the name and address of the voter on the ballot itself or just the envelope it was sent and addressed to?

---

Just the envelope. Once the ballot is separated, there is no way to identify it to a particular person.

---

Didn't the ballot have to be signed or something though? Either way though, that is effing ridiculous. There literally is no way then to validate the results. What is the reasoning behind not having the voter's name on the ballot? Have absentee ballot always been like that?

One more question, the movie said that there were more than 54,000 mules active in the election. That equates to hundreds of thousands of harvested ballots. How is it even possible that this many ballots were even available? Are there hundreds of thousands of voters on registered rolls who are dead or otherwise unable to vote? How is it possible that the rolls are that far off? And was there any way to verify whether a voter voted in person before a MIB was mailed to them?

Quote:

---

How is it even possible that this many ballots were even available?

---

Get a copy of the voter rolls and start filling out ballots.

Hungry Ojos said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Hungry Ojos said:

---

Question about absentee ballots. Was the name and address of the voter on the ballot itself or just the envelope it was sent and addressed to?

---

Just the envelope. Once the ballot is separated, there is no way to identify it to a particular person.

---

Didn't the ballot have to be signed or something though? Either way though, that is effing ridiculous. There literally is no way then to validate the results. What is the reasoning behind not having the voter's name on the ballot? Have absentee ballot always been like that?

---

Ballot is not signed. The envelope is signed and in many states, supposed to be witnessed as well with another signature.

My mother was an absentee voter for the 2010, 2012 elections. One year I went by out poling place to return her absentee ballot but they wouldn't accept it. If it were mailed to her it had to be returned only by mail. Now we are in small town rural area, they knew I was my mother's caretaker but still wouldn't allow it.

Have they not released the names of these non-profits who were ostensibly organizing these frauds?

fasthorse05 said:

---

CSTXAg92 said:

---

Bidens leg hairs said:

---

Where was the Republican Party? Don't you think with all the millions in campaign funds that you would have a team of investigators and spies tracking the Democrat Party and trying to expose fraud like this?

---

Silent, if not complicit.

Trump was *truly* a Washington outsider. Republicans wanted him out of office as much as dims.

---

I've thought about your comment, or a version of your comment, a lot.

It's a given the Dems/Left were going to viscerally hate Trump. They've viscerally hated every single Republican president, and will continue to do so. From Reagan to '41 to '43, they were all going to "destroy America, democracy, my children, the world, and and college football". But Trump was and has been different.

The reason I bring this up is what exactly did Trump do that any other Republican president didn't do, except to be rough around the edges while speaking and pick his cabinet rather poorly. Otherwise, he had outstanding policies and pissed off a lot of our allies with frank conversations.

Even other Republicans turned on him; I'd say about 20% of elected Republicans supported getting rid of him. I understand RINO's, etc., but they NEVER supported getting rid of a sitting Republican president before. Have any of y'all ever wondered if there's something else the general public doesn't know about Trump, other than being an outsider. It's not like Trump was going to expose all of the corruption in DC, and elsewhere. He never got a chance, and never even got started. Our government has reached the the size that it can do what it wants, when it wants, so one man wasn't going to change it.

Just my 2 cents.

---

Trump fooled them. He spent his whole life acting like politics wasn't his concern and that he was a middle of the road Democrat. He was friends with far more people of the left than he was of people of the right. Then he won the nomination and he exposed them and himself. They realized his act was actually his true self and he made a fool out of most of them.

Hungry Ojos said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Hungry Ojos said:

---

Question about absentee ballots. Was the name and address of the voter on the ballot itself or just the envelope it was sent and addressed to?

---

Just the envelope. Once the ballot is separated, there is no way to identify it to a particular person.

---

Didn't the ballot have to be signed or something though? Either way though, that is effing ridiculous. There literally is no way then to validate the results. What is the reasoning behind not having the voter's name on the ballot? Have absentee ballot always been like that?

---

I would hope the U.S. never requires the identification of the voter on the ballot.

The Democratic Party leadership would immediately turn this into a weapon against political opponents. The practice of doxing online posters is bad enough and will get worse with the new "Ministry of Truth" President Biden has created. The Democratic Party leadership may decry Putin as evil but they are absolutely envious of his total power, the Democratic Party leadership are the most least self aware monsters in this country.

edit spelling

I don't post here much but heard my name called…

redsquirrelAG said:

---

I don't have to watch.

I'm not a ****ing zombie controlled weak spined *****.

I've said loudly from the beginning it was stolen and anyone unable to see that was a ****ing mental midget.

---

But now you have substantial evidence based on the video to confirm what you were already yelling.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/TizNoVq1qcwb/

Full movie if not posted yet

Keegan99 said:

---

I don't think you understand what harvesting is. It doesn't require deceased or incapacitated voters.

Harvesting is finding someone who is otherwise a non-voter, and then guiding them through the process. You fill out the mail-in application for them (if necessary in the state), and then when the ballot arrives, guide them through completion. Finally, you ferry the ballot to a drop box.

It's particularly easy if the person is elderly. Many elderly living alone are just happy to have someone to talk to. And many nursing home operators are happy to get in on the operation.


It's even easier if you have access to a curbside mailbox. Theoretically, the voter doesn't even need to be involved. Especially if signature-verification is weak or non-existent.

---

They were also paying people for their ballots. Its on video

After watching 2000 Mules:

Pookers said:

---

PA24 said:

---

Waiting on response from Senate Minority Leader, turtle neck himself and also Graham. You know, the usual suspects that hid their head n the sand.

---

2020 doesn't happen without the GOPe wing of the establishment helping in the steal.

---

Have to agree. Electronic voting systems have been problematical since their introduction. Which, if you recall, began as a response to the hanging chad crap from 2000 in Florida. Because some dumb Democrat election official couldn't properly design a punch paper ballot.

From there, it went even more downhill. Now, Dominion may have zero to do with Venezuela (which I don't think they do) but their creation and very rapid expansion, courtesy of the Holder Justice Department, tells another story.

aggiehawg said:

---

Hungry Ojos said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Hungry Ojos said:

---

Question about absentee ballots. Was the name and address of the voter on the ballot itself or just the envelope it was sent and addressed to?

---

Just the envelope. Once the ballot is separated, there is no way to identify it to a particular person.

---

Didn't the ballot have to be signed or something though? Either way though, that is effing ridiculous. There literally is no way then to validate the results. What is the reasoning behind not having the voter's name on the ballot? Have absentee ballot always been like that?

---

Ballot is not signed. The envelope is signed and in many states, supposed to be witnessed as well with another signature.

My mother was an absentee voter for the 2010, 2012 elections. One year I went by out poling place to return her absentee ballot but they wouldn't accept it. If it were mailed to her it had to be returned only by mail. Now we are in small town rural area, they knew I was my mother's caretaker but still wouldn't allow it.

---

I am so freaking lost and I sincerely apologize for all the questions. Why is the envelope signed? Like when you receive a certified letter? To prove receipt? Do you have to turn in the signed envelope with the ballot for the ballot to count?