i believe the line was in danger of committing "a grave constitutional violation of his 5th amendment rights. "aggiehawg said:Judge admonished Binger for being over the line in badgering.FriscoKid said:
Judge is going to roast Binger?
****Kyle Rittenhouse Trial-Day 7****
163,860 Views |
2089 Replies |
Last: 4 yr ago by Texaggie7nine
Hawg, how big of a reprimand is that?
aggiehawg said:Judge admonished Binger for being over the line in badgering.FriscoKid said:
Judge is going to roast Binger?
Not really. It was a warning not to question the defendant's constitutional right to remain silent.
Sea Speed said:planoaggie123 said:tk111 said:Its exactly what he said. Very well doneplanoaggie123 said:tk111 said:
shoot to stop. shoot to stop.shoot to stop. shoot to stop.
this would have been a better answer but i *think* he did ok....
My thoughts are don't say "used deadly force" but "used force to stop"
But it was deadly force. Just because you use deadly force doesn't mean you intend to kill.
100% agree. I do. Just would want to limit the word "dead" from his mouth....
Not a bad answer at all....but wondering if "force to stop" would have been even better....
"You might be over the line with a constitutional protection..."
BlackGoldAg2011 said:i believe the line was in danger of committing "a grave constitutional violation of his 5th amendment rights. "aggiehawg said:Judge admonished Binger for being over the line in badgering.FriscoKid said:
Judge is going to roast Binger?
Judge also said he might've crossed the line even.
What is judge saying?wbt5845 said:
Judge giving him hell.
Thank you, 'hawg.
This isn't inept. He doesn't have the law or evidence on his side so he is throwing his hail mary.pacecar02 said:
How inept can you be
It is despicable.
"you had an AR armed with 30 rounds"
"You could have killed 30 people"
WTF?
"You could have killed 30 people"
WTF?
Stand corrected. Binger was implying about Kyle remaining silent until now. That's a comment about Kyle's 5th amendment rights.BlackGoldAg2011 said:i believe the line was in danger of committing "a grave constitutional violation of his 5th amendment rights. "aggiehawg said:Judge admonished Binger for being over the line in badgering.FriscoKid said:
Judge is going to roast Binger?
Why didn't the defense object to that question?
Judge is legitimately pissed at this *******
This ADA is an asshat
Who is John Galt?
2026
2026
lol Kyle's answer on the FOID card lol
FriscoKid said:
"you had an AR armed with 30 rounds"
"You could have killed 30 people"
WTF?
He should not have answered that with a yes
This dude knows his gun laws better than the state.
Binged is being very condescending.
This DA is a chode and a half
"pay attention to my question please"
dude cannot be more annoying
dude cannot be more annoying
And if you are ever on a Jury i hope I can be too so i can argue vehemently against this asserting during deliberations. because it IS NEVER the defendant's duty to prove or even defend their innocence, it is the state's duty to prove beyond reasonable doubt that they are guilty. and any juror who takes a different mindset or position is an affront to our justice system.aTmAg said:Obviously, I disagree. As a layman potential juror someday, if a defendant doesn't testify, I assume he has something to hide. It becomes a "prove to me you are innocent" situation rather than "prove he is guilty". I don't care what lawyers or the judge tells me.Strongweasel97 said:I disagree. This is not a savvy choice, but a defendant's choice to tell his story.aTmAg said:I think not testifying would have looked bad to the jury. Even though it's not supposed to. And the defense team is savvy enough to know what they had when called him.Strongweasel97 said:They are not in a lose-lose. This cross was their lifeline in this case.aTmAg said:
I predict prosecution will come off as browbeating an innocent kid. They are in a lose-lose. Either they play nice and he comes off innocent, or they browbeat him and they come off as a-holes.
The problem is: I think he stood a good chance of being acquitted before his testimony. A good cross can bring enough doubt to hang a jury and give the prosecution a chance to polish and correct in a new trial.
It's not the same as not talking to the police. Where everything can be used against you but nor for you. Not talking DOES hurt you in front of a jury. He's behind the curve is he doesn't testify and the evidence would have to overcome that. If he does testify, I consider him even. Then his believability would either win or lose the day (as far as his testimony goes).
Binger is an idiot
Is the DA going for a straw purchase?
Disagree. He acknowledged a fact.Sea Speed said:FriscoKid said:
"you had an AR armed with 30 rounds"
"You could have killed 30 people"
WTF?
He should not have answered that with a yes
If he said no it would paint him as reckless.
Dont like his comment about wanting a shotgun but getting a rifle instead....those are far too different...
If he is, then he charged the wrong person.FriscoKid said:
Is the DA going for a straw purchase?
"A grave constitutional violation"aggiehawg said:Stand corrected. Binger was implying about Kyle remaining silent until now. That's a comment about Kyle's 5th amendment rights.BlackGoldAg2011 said:i believe the line was in danger of committing "a grave constitutional violation of his 5th amendment rights. "aggiehawg said:Judge admonished Binger for being over the line in badgering.FriscoKid said:
Judge is going to roast Binger?
Ouch. I still don't think he should have took the stand.
ADA getting taken to task now.
Who is John Galt?
2026
2026
Hawg, quick question, the jury has to be unanimous on a guilty or acquittal verdict correct?
If not, the jury is hung and then is it a mistrial or is the case retried or is Kyle set free at that point?
If not, the jury is hung and then is it a mistrial or is the case retried or is Kyle set free at that point?
I WILL say, that watching video (to the right of Rittenhouse), I can't understand how ANYONE would believe he killed those two guys in 'cold blood'.
I also think that the Prosecution's 'tone' in questioning Rittenhouse is VERY condescending.
I also think that the Prosecution's 'tone' in questioning Rittenhouse is VERY condescending.
Defendent is schooling prosecutor on gun law. Freaking amazing. Prosecutor is a dumbass.
Painful to watch. Why did they put him on the stand? The prosecution already proved it was self-defense. All the defense had to do was just recap the prosecution.
ADA is arguing that the gun laws are bad? TF does that have to do with Kyle?
Does the ADA not know the gun laws in WI?
BOOM!
Chuck Gay
Buc-ee's new sponsor of bishop lynch high school athletics
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
57
Hungry
Is there a world next year where Earley is the hitting coach?
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
55
AggieNattie
FINAL from Blue Bell Park: No. 20 Texas A&M 8, Vanderbilt 4 (Friday, Game 1)
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
33
Aldo the Apache
LIVE from Blue Bell Park: No. 20 Texas A&M vs. Vanderbilt (Friday, Game 2)
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
25
dermdoc
LIVE from Blue Bell Park: No. 20 Texas A&M vs. Vanderbilt (Friday, Game 1)
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
24