Is this movie worth it to people who don't think the Beatles were that great? Do you have to be a fan boy to enjoy it?
oragator said:
You mean Hey Dude?
OldArmy71 said:
My granddaughter and I were wondering: How much did it cost to get the rights to sing the songs? How much did it cost to play Hey Jude?
Aha, thanks! I would never have thought to look for it there with the title "Did you hear...?".hph6203 said:
The instructions are pinned at the top of this forum if you ever wanna learn.
so this brings up a point that i've thought about for a while. and maybe someone more familiar with the movie business model can offer a simple explanation...oragator said:
So many people here have seen it, which is awesome. But it's only made 52 million domestically going into the weekend, which is a shame.
88 million BO currently WW against a 26 million budget and some money still to come, so it will turn a profit. Just wish more people had found it. My guess is that it will be one of those movies that finds more love when it gets to cable.
i noticed the same thing and actually kept waiting for that scene.Quad Dog said:
The wife and I saw this last night (I avoided saying yesterday) and I really enjoyed it. I wanted more, and its usually a good thing when a movie leaves you wanting more. Too often these days movies over explain and answer every question. My wife has family in south London, so we loved all the England scenes.
I don't think I would have learned much maths from Lilly James as my teacher. They, tried, but couldn't make her unattractive in this.
However, what happened to the "Something" moment on James Corden's show from the trailer with Ana De Armas? It and her character were completely cut from the movie. I guess we should all accept that trailers just constantly lie to us?
jackie childs said:so this brings up a point that i've thought about for a while. and maybe someone more familiar with the movie business model can offer a simple explanation...oragator said:
So many people here have seen it, which is awesome. But it's only made 52 million domestically going into the weekend, which is a shame.
88 million BO currently WW against a 26 million budget and some money still to come, so it will turn a profit. Just wish more people had found it. My guess is that it will be one of those movies that finds more love when it gets to cable.
why doesn't the film industry use dynamic pricing?
Yeah, that's what I meant.Philo B 93 said:jackie childs said:so this brings up a point that i've thought about for a while. and maybe someone more familiar with the movie business model can offer a simple explanation...oragator said:
So many people here have seen it, which is awesome. But it's only made 52 million domestically going into the weekend, which is a shame.
88 million BO currently WW against a 26 million budget and some money still to come, so it will turn a profit. Just wish more people had found it. My guess is that it will be one of those movies that finds more love when it gets to cable.
why doesn't the film industry use dynamic pricing?
Does that mean charge more for certain movies? Like concerts? Interesting idea. Makes sense to me, until I have to pay $90 / ticket to see Spider Man 3.
I'd pay 3x to watch what is in the theater at my house. I have two kids in diapers and it costs at least that much to hire a sitter, etc. Would be nice to see stuff when it comes out instead of having to wait until it drops digitally.jackie childs said:Yeah, that's what I meant.Philo B 93 said:jackie childs said:so this brings up a point that i've thought about for a while. and maybe someone more familiar with the movie business model can offer a simple explanation...oragator said:
So many people here have seen it, which is awesome. But it's only made 52 million domestically going into the weekend, which is a shame.
88 million BO currently WW against a 26 million budget and some money still to come, so it will turn a profit. Just wish more people had found it. My guess is that it will be one of those movies that finds more love when it gets to cable.
why doesn't the film industry use dynamic pricing?
Does that mean charge more for certain movies? Like concerts? Interesting idea. Makes sense to me, until I have to pay $90 / ticket to see Spider Man 3.
It cost $350mil to make Endgame, but we pay the same ticket price to see it that we do to see Yesterday, which cost less than $40mil.
With more and more cheap content available, it seems like more people just deem movies like this to be "i'll definitely catch it on Redbox or Netflix". I wonder if more people might go to the theater if the cost of doing so was a little less. While not as critical as seeing an effects-driven film on the big screen, there was something really cool about hearing the Beatles' tunes playing loudly in a theater.